Skip to main content
Log in

Digital volume correlation: Three-dimensional strain mapping using X-ray tomography

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A three-dimensional extension of two-dimensional digital image correlation has been developed. The technique uses digital image volumes generated through high-resolution X-ray tomography of samples with microarchitectural detail, such as the trabecular bone tissue found within the skeleton. Image texture within the material is used for displacement field measurement by subvolume tracking. Strain fields are calculated from the displacement fields by gradient estimation techniques. Estimates of measurement precision were developed through correlation of repeat unloaded data sets for a simple sum-of-squares displacement-only correlation formulation. Displacement vector component errors were normally distributed, with a standard deviation of 0.035 voxels (1.22 μm). Strain tensor component errors were also normally distributed, with a standard deviation of approximately 0.0003. The method was applied to two samples taken from the thigh bone near the knee. Strains were effectively measured in both the elastic and postyield regimes of material behavior, and the spatial patterns showed clear relationships to the sample microarchitectures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bruck, H.A., McNeill, S.R., Sutton, M.A., andPeters, W.H., III, “Digital Image Correlation Using Newton-Raphson Method of Partial Differential Correction,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,29,261–267 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chu, T.C., Ranson, W.F., Sutton, M.A., andPeters, W.H., “Applications of Digital-image-correlation Techniques to Experimental Mechanics,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,25,232–244 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kahn-Jetter, Z.L., Jha, N.K., andBhatia, H., “Optimal Image Correlation in Experimental Mechanics,”Opt. Eng.,33,1099–1105 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sutton, M.A., Wolters, W.J., Peters, W.H., Ranson, W.F., andMcNeill, S.R., “Determination of Displacements Using an Improved Digital Correlation Method,”Image Vis. Computing,1,133–139 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sutton, M.A., Cheng, M., Peters, W.H., Chao, Y.J., andMcNeill, S.R., “Application of an Optimized Digital Correlation Method to Planar Deformation Analysis,”Image Vis. Computing,4,143–150 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boegli, V. andKern, D.P., “Automatic Mark Detection in Electron Beam Nanolithography Using Digital Image Processing and Correlation,”J. Vacuum Sci. Tech.,8,1994–2001 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lyons, J.S., Liu, J., andSutton, M.A., “High-temperature Deformation Measurements Using Digital-image Correlation,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,36,64–70 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. McNeill, S.R., Peters, W.H., andSutton, M.A., “Estimation of Stress Intensity Factor by Digital Image Correlation,”Eng. Fract. Mech.,28,101–112 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Manduchi, R. and Mian, G.A., “Accuracy Analysis for Correlation-based Image Registration Algorithms,” IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Chicago (1993).

  10. Sutton, M.A., McNeill, S.R., Jang, J., andBabai, M., “Effects of Subpixel Image Restoration on Digital Correlation Error Estimates,”Opt. Eng.,27,870–877 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tolat, A.R., McNeill, S.R., and Sutton, M.A., “Effects of Contrast and Brightness on Subpxel Image Correlation,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, Columbia, South Carolina (1991).

  12. Russell, S.S. andSutton, M.A., “Strain-field Analysis Acquired Through Correlation of X-ray Radiographs of a Fiber-reinforced Composite Laminate,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,29,237–240 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bay, B.K., “Texture Correlation: A Method for the Measurement of Detailed Strain Distributions Within Trabecular Bone,”J. Orthopaedic Res.,13,258–267 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Helm, J.D., McNeill, S.R., andSutton, M.A., “Improved Three-dimensional Image Correlation for Surface Displacement Measurement,”Opt. Eng.,35,1911–1920 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kahn-Jetter, Z.L. andChu, T.C., “Three-dimensional Displacement Measurements Using Digital Image Correlation and Photogrammic Analysis,” EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS,30,10–16 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Durand, E.P. andRuegsegger, P., “Cancellous Bone Structure: Analysis of High-resolution Ct Images with the Run-length Method,”J. Computer Assisted Tomography,15,133–139 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elke, R.P.E., Cheal, E.J., Simmons, C., andPoss, R., “Three-dimensional Anatomy of the Cancellous Structures Within the Proximal Femur from Computed Tomography Data,”J. Orthopaedic Res.,13,513–523 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Feldkamp, L.A., Goldstein, S.A., Parfitt, A.M., Jesion, G., andKleerekoper, M., “The Direct Examination of Three-dimensional Bone Architecture In Vitro by Computed Tomography,”J. Bone Mineral Res.,4,3–11 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Flynn, M.J. andCody, D.D., “The Assessment of Vertebral Bone Macroarchitecture with X-ray Computed Tomography,”Calcified Tissue Int.,53,S170-S175 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kuhn, J.L., Goldstein, S.A., Feldkamp, L.A., Goulet, R.W., andJesion, G., “Evaluation of a Microcomputed Tomography System to Study Trabecular Bone Structure,”J. Orthopaedic Res.,8,833–842 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bart-Smith, H., Bastawros, A.F., Mumm, D.R., Evans, A.G., Sypeck, D.J., andWadley, H.N.G., “Compressive Deformation and Yielding Mechanisms in Cellular Al Alloys Determined Using X-ray Tomography and Surface Strain Mapping,”Acta Materialia,46,3583–3592 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Breunig, T.M., Stock, S.R., andBrown, R.C., “Simple Load Frame for In Situ Computed Tomography and X-ray Tomographic Microscopy,”Mat. Eval.,51,596–600 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Burch, S.F. andLawrence, P.F., “Recent Advances in Computerized X-ray Tomography Using Real-time Radiography Equipment,”Brit. J. NDT,34,129–133 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Deis, T.A. andLannutti, J.J., “X-ray Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Density Gradient Formation During the Compaction of Spray-dried Granules,”J. Am. Ceramic Soc.,81,1237–1247 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Drake, S.G., “Improved Real-time X-ray Technology Widens the Horizons of Industrial Computer Tomography,”Brit. J. NDT,35,580–583 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jasti, J.K., Jesion, G., andFeldkamp, L., “Microscopic Imaging of Porous Media with X-ray Computer Tomography,”SPE Formation Eval.,8,189–193 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kropas, C.V., Moran, T.J., andYancey, R.N., “Effect of Composition on Density Measurement by X-ray Computed Tomography,”Mat. Eval.,49,487–490 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lambrineas, P., Davis, J.R., Suendermann, B., Wells, P., Thomson, K.R., Woodward, R.L., Egglestone, G.T., andChallis, K., “X-ray Computed Tomography Examination of Inshore Mine-hunter Hull Composite Material,”NDT&E Int.,24,207–213 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lavebratt, H., Ostman, E., Persson, S., andStenberg, B., “Application of Computed X-ray Tomography Scanning in the Study of Thermo-oxidative Degradation of Thick-walled Filled Natural Rubber Vulcanizates,”J. Appl. Polymer Sci.,44,83–94 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  30. London, B., Yancey, R.N., andSmith, J.A., “High-resolution X-ray Computed Tomography of Composite Materials,”Mat. Eval.,48,604–608 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Phillips, D.H. andLannutti, J.J., “Measuring Physical Density with X-ray Computed Tomography,”NDT&E Int.,30,339–350 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Watson, A.T. andMudra, J., “Characterization of Devonian Shales with X-ray Computed Tomography,”SPE Formation Eval.,9,209–212 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Reimann, D.A., Hames, S.M., Flynn, M.J., andFyhrie, D.P., “A Cone Beam Computed Tomography System for True 3D Imaging of Specimens,”Appl. Radiation Isotopes,48, (10–12),1433–1436 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Feldkamp, L.A., Davis, L.C., andKress, J.W., “Practical Cone-beam Algorithm,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. A,1,612–619 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gill, P.E., Murray, W., andWright, M.H., Practical Optimization, Academic Press, London, 133–140 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lancaster, P. andSalkauskas, K., Curve and Surface Fitting—An Introduction, Academic Press, London, 190 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Geers, M.G.D., De Borst, R., andBrekelmans, W.A.M., “Compuling Strain Fields from Discrete Displacement Fields in 2D-solids,”Int. J. Solids Struct.,33,4293–4307 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Keaveny, T.M., Guo, X.E., Wachtel, E.F., McMahon, T.A., andHayes, W.C., “Trabecular Bone Exhibits Fully Linear Elastic Behavior and Yields at Low Strain,”J. Biomechanics,27,1127–1136 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bay, B.K., Smith, T.S., Fyhrie, D.P. et al. Digital volume correlation: Three-dimensional strain mapping using X-ray tomography. Experimental Mechanics 39, 217–226 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02323555

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02323555

Key Words

Navigation