Skip to main content
Log in

The dependence of acoustic emission on strain rate in 7075-T6 aluminum

The aim of this experimental investigation was to determine the effect of strain rate on the acoustic emission from a polycrystalline metal

  • Applications
  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dependence of RMS acoustic-emission output on strain rate was determined during tensile tests on 7075-T6 aluminum over a range of strain rates from 0.015 min−1 to 0.230 min−1. A special normalization technique was developed to eliminate the inherent differences in the acoustic emission from supposedly identical specimens tested under identical conditions. It was found that the RMS acoustic-emission output increases approximately linearly with strain rate, and that the slope of the linear dependence decreased with increased plastic strain. The effect of pinned dislocation breakaway on the acoustic-emission output vs. plastic-strain relationship is the subject of a preliminary theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

constant

B :

constant

H :

hardening coefficient

L i :

pinned-dislocation length per unit volume

n i :

number of dislocation segments

n :

constant

RMS :

acoustic-emission voltage output

t :

time

\(\dot \in \) :

strain rate

p :

plastic-strain rate

\(\dot \in _p \) :

plastic-strain rate

ρ t :

total-dislocation density per unit volume

ρ m :

mobile-dislocation density per unit volume

ρ m′ :

mobile-dislocation density per unit volume associated with unpinning

\(\mathop \Sigma \limits_{i = 1} \) :

summation overi

σ i :

root-mean-square shear stress

v :

crosshead rate

References

  1. James, D. R. andCarpenter, S. H., “Relationship Between Acoustic Emission and Dislocation Kinetics in Crystalline Solids,”J. of Appl. Phys.,42 (12),4685 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Frederick, J. R., “Dislocation Motion as a Source of Acoustic Emission”, Acoustic Emission, STP 505, edited by R. G. Liptai, D. O. Harris and C. A. Tatro, ASTM (1972).

  3. Gillis, “Dislocation Motions and Acoustic Emission,” Acoustic Emission, STP 505, edited by R. G. Liptai, D. O. Harris and C. A. Tatro, ASTM (1972).

  4. Dunegan, H. L. andHarris, D. O., “Acoustic Emission—A New Nondestructive Testing Tool,”Ultrasonics,1,160, (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schofield, B. H., “Acoustic Emission Under Applied Stress,” AF Materials Lab., Wright-Patterson AFB, Oh, Contract No. AF 33 (657)-8562, Project No. 7360, Task No. 736002, Tech. Documentary Report No. ASD-TDR-509, Part II (May 1964).

  6. Fisher, R. M. andLally, J. S., “Microplasticity Detected by an Acoustic Technique,”Can. J. Phys.,45,1147 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dunegan, H. L., Harris, D. O. andTatro, C. A., “Fracture Analysis By Use of Acoustic Emission,”Engn. Fract. Mech.,1,105 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tatro, C. A., “Design Criteria For Acoustic Emission Experimentation”, Acoustic Emission, STP 505, edited by R. G. Liptai, D. O. Harris and C. A. Tatro, ASTM (1972).

  9. Bill, R. C., “An Acoustic Emission Study Of The Deformation Mechanics of Polycrystalline Aluminum and Copper,”PhD Dissertation, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mukherjee, A. K., unpublished work, Univ. of California, Davis, CA.

  11. Koehler, J. S., Imperfections in Nearly Perfect Crystals, John Wiley and Sons, New York Ch. 7 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mason, W. P., “Phonon Viscosity and Its Effect on Acoustic Wave Attenuation and Dislocation Motion,”J. of the ASA,32 (4),458 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sedwick, R. T., “Acoustic Emission From Single Crystals of LiF and KCI,”J. of Appl. Phys.,39 (1),1728 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. James, D. R., Short Course, “Acoustic Emission Technology,”Dunegan Research Corporation, Livermore, CA (Aug. 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gilman, J. J., “Microdynamical Theory of Plasticity,”Microplasticity Edited by C. J. McMahon, Jr., Interscience, New York 17 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kahn, D., Austin, D., Mukherjee, A. K. and Dorn, J. E., “The Importance of Geometric Statistics to Dislocation Motion,” J. of Appl. Probability, in press.

  17. Gerberich, W. andReuter, W., Final Report to ONR, Contract No. 00014-66-C0340, Aerojet-Genetal Corporation, Sacramento, CA (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Conrad, H., Dislocation Dynamics, edited by A. R. Rosenfield, J. T. Hahn, A. L. Bement andR. I. Jaffee, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 431 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamstad, M.A., Mukherjee, A.K. The dependence of acoustic emission on strain rate in 7075-T6 aluminum. Experimental Mechanics 14, 33–41 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02324858

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02324858

Keywords

Navigation