Skip to main content
Log in

Biomechanical model to simulate tissue differentiation and bone regeneration: Application to fracture healing

  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bone regeneration is a common biological process occurring, for example, during fracture healing or osseo-integration of prostheses. Computer simulation of bone regeneration is difficult to carry out because it is a complex sequence of cell-mediated processes regulated by mechanobiological stimuli. An algorithm to predict the time-course of intramembranous and endochondral ossification has been developed. The algorithm assumes that there are precursor cells in the undifferentiated tissue and that these cells differentiate into either fibroblasts (to form fibrous connective tissue), chondrocytes (to form cartilaginous tissue) or osteoblasts (to form bone), based on a combination of biophysical stimuli derived from strain in the collagenous matrix and flow of the interstitial fluid. Both these stimuli are known to deform the precursor cells, and the authors hypothesise that this causes activation of cell differentiation pathways. The observation that precursor cells take time to spread throughout the fracture callus has been included in the algorithm. The algorithm was tested in an investigation of the fracture healing of a long bone using an axisymmetric finite element model. The spatio-temporal sequence of tissue phenotypes that appear in the course of fracture healing was successfully simulated. Furthermore, the origin of the precursor cells (either surrounding muscle, bone marrow or periosteum) was predicted to have a fundamental effect on the healing pattern and on the rate of reduction of the interfragmentary strain (IFS). The initial IFS=0.15 drops to 0.01 within seven iterations if cells originated from the surrounding soft tissue, but took more than 50% longer if cells originated in the inner cambium layer of the periosteum, and four times longer if precursor cells originated from the bone marrow only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

σ1,2,3 :

principal stresses

D :

diffusion co-efficient

E :

average Young's modulus

E granulation :

Young's modulus of granulation tissues

E tissue :

Young's modulus of differentiated tissue

H :

hydrostatic stress

n :

cell density

n max :

maximum cell density

OI :

osteogenic index

S :

octahedral shear stress

References

  • Blenman, P. R., Carter, D. R., andBeaupré, G. S. (1989): ‘Role of mechanical loading in the progressive ossification of a fracture callus’,J. Orthop. Res.,7, pp. 398–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D. R., Blenman, P. R., andBeaupré, G. S. (1988): ‘Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing’,J. Orthop. Res.,6, pp. 736–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Claes, L. E., Heigele, C. A., Neidlinger-Wilke, C., Kaspar, D., Seidl, W., Margevivius, J., andAugat, P. (1998): ‘Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process’,Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.,355S, pp. 132–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Claes, L. E., andHeigele, C. A. (1999): ‘Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing’,J. Biomech.,32, pp. 255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowin, S. C. (1999): ‘Bone poroelasticity’,J. Biomech.,32, pp. 217–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, T. A. (1998): ‘The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing’,Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.,355S, pp. 7–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, T. A., Stoll, T., Marks, L., andKnothe Tate, M. (2000): ‘The influence of mechanical stimulus on the pattern of tissue differentiation in a long bone fracture-an FEM study’,J. Biomech.,33, pp. 415–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hori, R. Y., andLewis, J. L. (1982): ‘Mechanical properties of the fibrous tissue found at the bone-cement interface following total joint replacement’,J. Biomed. Mater. Res.,16, pp. 911–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huiskes, R., van Driel, W. D., Prendergast, P. J., andSøballe, K. (1997): ‘A biomechanical regulatory model of peri-prosthetic tissue differentiation’,J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.,8, pp. 785–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwaki, A., Jingushi, S., Oda, Y., Izumi, T., Shida, J. I., Tsuneyoshi, M., andSugioka, Y. (1997): ‘Localization and quantification of proliferating cells during rat fracture repair: detection of proliferating cell nuclear antigen by immunohistochemistry’,J. Bone Min. Res.,12, pp. 96–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper, J. H., Ashton, B. A., andRichardson, J. B. (2000): ‘Computer simulation of fracture callus formation and stiffness restoration’. Proceedings of 12th Conference of European Society of Biomechanics, p. 61, urwww.biomechanics.ie/esb2000

  • Lacroix, D., andPrendergast, P. J. 2000a: ‘A homogenization procedure to prevent numerical instabilities in poroelastic tissue differentiation models’. Proceedings of 8th Symposium on Computational Methods in Orthopaedic Biomechanics, urwww.me.gatech.edu/pre-ORS/

  • Lacroix, D., andPrendergast, P. J. 2000b: ‘A 3D finite element model of a tibia to simulate the regenerative and resportive phases during fracture healing’. Proceedings of 12th Conference of European Society of Biomechanics, p. 60, urwww.biomechanics.ie/esb2000.

  • McKibbin, B. (1978): ‘The biology of fracture healing in long bones’,J. Bone Joint Surg.,60B, 150–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Mow, V. C., Kuei, S. C., Lai, W. M., andArmstrong, C. G. (1980): ‘Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage: theory and experiments’,J. Biomech. Eng.,102, pp. 73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa, J. A., andHillberry, B. M. (1992): ‘Permeability of bovine cancellous bone’. Transactions of 38th Meeting of Orthopaedic Research Society, p. 162

  • Olsen, L., Sherratt, J. A., andMaini, P. K. (1996): ‘A mathematical model for fibro-proliferative wound healing disorders’,Bull. Math. Biol.,58, pp. 787–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, F. (1941): ‘Grundrieß einer Biomechanik der Frakturheilung’. 34th Kongreß der Deutschen Orthopädischen Gesellschaft (Ferdinand Enke Verlag: Stuttgart, 1941), pp. 62–108. Translated as ‘Biomechanics of fracture healing’ in ‘Biomechanics of the locomotor apparatus’ byMaquet, P., andFurlong, R. (Springer, Berlin, 1980), pp. 107–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, F. (1960): ‘Eine Neue Theorie über den Einfluß Mechanischer Reize auf die Differenzierung der Stützgewebe’,Z. Anat. Entwickl. Gesch.,121, pp. 478–515. Translated as ‘A new theory concerning the influence of mechanical stimuli on the differentiation of the supporting tissues’ in ‘Biomechanics of the locomotor apparatus’ byMaquet, P., andFurlong, R. (Springer, Berlin, 1980), pp. 375–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perren, S. M. (1979): ‘Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation’,Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.,138, p. 175

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, P. J., van Driel, W. D., andKuiper, J. H. (1996): ‘A comparison of finite element codes for the solution of biphasic poroelastic problems’,Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H,210, pp. 131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, P. J., andvan der Meulen, M. C. H. (2001): ‘Mechanics of bone regeneration’ inCowin, S. C. (Ed.): Handbook of bone mechanics’ (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2001), pp. 32.1–32.13

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, P. J. (1997): ‘Finite element models in tissue mechanics and orthopaedic implant design’,Clin. Biomech.,12, pp. 343–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, P. J., Huiskes, R., andSøballe, K. (1997): ‘Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces’,J. Biomech.,30, pp. 539–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhinelander, F. W. (1974): ‘Tibial blood supply in relation to fracture healing’,Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.,105, pp. 35–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherratt, J. A., Martin, P., Murray, J. D., andLewis, J. (1992): ‘Mathematical models of would healing in embryonic and adult epidermis’,IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol.,9, pp. 177–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Tencer, A. F., andJohnson, J. (1994): Biomechanics in orthopaedic trauma’ (Martin Dinitz, London, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, J. U., andJohnstone, B. 1998. ‘The role of osteochondral progenitor cells in fracture repair’,Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res.,355, pp. 73–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, R., Cheifetz, S., Mcculloch, C. A. G., andSodek, J. (1998): Analysis of intracellular osteopontin as a marker of osteoblastic cell differentiation and mesenchymal cell migration,Eur. J. Oral. Sci.,106, pp. 401–407

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. J. Prendergast.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lacroix, D., Prendergast, P.J., Li, G. et al. Biomechanical model to simulate tissue differentiation and bone regeneration: Application to fracture healing. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 40, 14–21 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347690

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347690

Keywords

Navigation