Skip to main content
Log in

Residential versus day treatment for children: A long-term follow-up study

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child Psychiatry and Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adults and adolescents, who as children, received day or residential treatment were followed up ten years after treatment completion. No differences were found between the two treatment modalities on follow-up ratings of personal and social adjustment. This pattern was not influenced by gender, IQ, or presenting problem. Overall, about two-thirds of the children demonstrated improvement at follow-up. As expected, individuals demonstrating higher levels of personal and social adjustment at initial assessment were functioning better at outcome. However, the magnitude of therapeutic gain was not significantly different for mild versus moderate-to-severe presenting problems. Suggestions for future research are included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson JH, Rasbury WC, Siegel LJ: Approaches to Child Treatment. New York: Wiley, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hersov L, Bentovin A: Inpatient units and day hospitals. In Child Psychiatry: Modern Approaches, ed. Rutter M, Hersov L. London: Blackwell, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Irwin M: Literature review. In Psychiatric Hospitalization of Children, ed. Schulman JL, Irwin M. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson DR, Lyman RO: Residential treatment of emotionally disturbed children. Handbook of Clinical Child Psychology, ed. Walker E, Roberts M. New York: Wiley, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Romanczyk RG, Kistner JA, Crimmons DB: Institutional treatment of severely disturbed children: Fact, possibility or nonsequitur. In Advances in Clinical Child Psychology (Vol. 3), ed. Lahey B, Kazdin A. New York: Wiley, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dalton R, Muller B, Forman MA: The psychiatric hospitalization of children: An overview. Child Psychiat Hum Devel 19: 231–44, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kazdin A: Child Psychotherapy: Developing and Identifying Effective Treatments. New York: Pergamon, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kiesler DJ: Experimental designs in psychotherapy research. Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change: An Empirical Analysis, ed. Bergin AE, Garfield SL, New York: Wiley, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cass LK, Thomas CB: Childhood Pathology and Later Adjustment: The Question of Prediction. New York: Wiley, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis M, Brown T: Psychotherapy in the residential treatment of the borderline child. Child Psychiat Hum Devel 10: 181–88, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bahn AK: Basic Medical Statistics. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huck S, Cormier W, Bounds W: Reading Statistics and Research. New York, Harper & Row, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yeaton W, Sechrest L: Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: Strength, integrity, and effectiveness. J Cons and Clin Psych 49: 156–57, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barrett CL, Hampe, IE, Miller LC: Research on Child Psychotherapy, Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change: An Empirical Analysis (2nd ed.), ed. Garfield SL, Bergin SL. New York: Wiley, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erker, G.J., Russell Searight, H., Amanat, E. et al. Residential versus day treatment for children: A long-term follow-up study. Child Psych Hum Dev 24, 31–39 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353716

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353716

Key Words

Navigation