Skip to main content
Log in

Application of genetics knowledge to the solution of pedigree problems

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on a study of undergraduate genetics students' conceptual and procedural knowledge and how that knowledge influences students' success in pedigree problem solving. Findings indicate that many students lack the knowledge needed to test hypotheses relating to X-linked modes of inheritance using either patterns of inheritance or genotypes. Case study data illustrate how these knowledge deficiencies acted as an impediment to correct and conclusive solutions of pedigree problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess.Cognitive psychology, 4, 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices.Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elstein, A. S., Shulman, L. S., & Sprafka, S. A. (1978).Medical problem solving. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley, F. N., Stewart, J., & Yarrock, W. L. (1982). Teachers' perceptions of important and difficult science content.Science Education, 66, 531–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackling, M. W. (1990).The development of expertise in genetic pedigree problem solving. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackling, M. W., & Lawrence, J. A. (1988). Expert and novice solutions of genetic pedigree problems.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 531–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackling, M. W., & Treagust, D. F. (1984). Research data necessary for meaningful review of grade ten high school genetics curricula.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. E., Duran, A. S., Hassebrock, F., Moller, J., Prietula, M., Feltovich, P. J., & Swanson, D. B. (1981). Expentise and error in diagnostic reasoning.Cognitive Science, 5, 235–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesgold, A. M. (1982). Acquiring expertise. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.),Tutorials in learning and memory, (pp. 31–60). New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. U. (1986, April).Problem solving in classical genetics: Successful and unsuccessful pedigree analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

  • Smith, M. U., & Good, R. (1984). Problem solving and classical genetics: Successful versus unsuccessful performance.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 895–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (1983). Student problem solving in high school genetics.Science Education, 67, 523–540.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Specializations: problem solving, laboratory work, conceptual change, science teacher education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hackling, M.W. Application of genetics knowledge to the solution of pedigree problems. Research in Science Education 24, 147–155 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356339

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356339

Keywords

Navigation