Skip to main content
Log in

The struggle for general science in Australia: The final campaign in the technical schools of the state of Victoria

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aims of the junior technical schools in Victoria were, from the time of their formal establishment in 1911, to provide preparatory education-training for two groups. First, for the relatively small number who proceeded to higher technical education, appropriate for industrial chemists, engineers and architects, and secondly, for the relatively larger numbers who sought to enter skilled trades. The first successful campaign in Australia for a general science for all other secondary students in Victoria was waged in the War years 1939–43 on a platform of science as “a badge of utility and a key to good citizenship”. These were the modest terms upon which science teaching secured a more central place in the classical literary curriculum. The final campaign twenty years later in technical schools was fought on the platform that school science was “not just a servant to trade or engineering courses.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Academy of Science. (1967).The web of life. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Labor Party. (1964).Looking to the future: Labor's plan for education in Victoria. Melbourne: Keeble

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, R. (1944). The science teacher and his objectives.Teachers College Record, 45(4), 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1966).Toward a theory of instruction. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butts, F. (1955).Assumptions underlying Australian education. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremin, L. (1961).The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education, 1876–1957. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. (1964).The development of an Australian science curriculum model. Unpublished PhD thesis, Michigan State University.

  • Cohen, D., & O'Neill, B. (1966).Science through activity. Melbourne: Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1984).How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890–1980. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., & Starling, S. (1918).A textbook of physics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Department of Victoria. (1967).Students at intake. Survey and Planning Branch Document A. 67/444. Melbourne: Department of Education, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eltham, E. (1945).Technical education in war and peace. Melbourne: Institute of Industrial Management of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabinyi, A. (1966). The Australian book. In C. Semmler & D. Whitlock (Eds.),Literary Australia. Melbourne: Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawns, R. (1985). Negotiating an Australian general science-the professional dilemma 1939–45.Research in Science Education, 15, 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawns, R. (1987). Clear thinking and scientific method for our future leaders.Research in Science Education, 17, 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawns, R. (1988).The maintenance and transformation of school science. Unpublished PhD thesis, Monash University, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawns, R. (1989). “Coping with the modern world.” The context and debate at the Australian Science Education Project guidelines conference.Research in Science Education, 19, 76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawns, R. (1990). Practicalising Piaget at the ASEP guidelines conference 1970.Research in Science Education, 20, 76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawns, R. (1993). Stories tell but words conceal-aspects of historiographical research.Research in Science Education, 21, 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawns, R. (1993). John Turner and public education. In D. Ashton, & S. Ducker,John Stewart Turner 1908–1991. Historical records of Australian Science, 9(3,) 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. (1990).School subjects and curriculum change. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I., & Dowbiggin, I. (1991). Vocational education and school reform: The case of the London (Canada) technical school 1990–1930.History of Education Review, 20(1), 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1973).The angry eye. Pott's Point: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, J. (1948). The content of education. InSpeeches at the conference of headmasters. Geelong: Geelong Grammar School, Corio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, D. (1964).The lucky country. Sydney: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, R. (1930).Junior technical electricity. London: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, E. (1960). The teaching of science in technical schools. (Memorandum to Schools, October). Melbourne: Technical Schools Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. (1978).From Armstrong to Nuffield. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliebard, H. (1986).The struggle for the American curriculum: 1890–1958. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D. (1973).Science for the people. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugg, D. (1968).Getting science across. Melbourne: Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S., & Connor, A. (1945).Basic physics. Melbourne: Whitcombe & Tombs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messel, H., Crocker, R., & Barker, E. (1963).Science for high school students. Sydney: Nuclear Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. (1980). Levels of the educational system and schooling effects. In C. Bredwell & D. Winaham (Eds.),Analysis of education productivity (Vol. 2, Issues in macroanalysis.). Cambridge: Ballington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milburn, G., Goodson, I., & Clark, R. (1989).Reinterpreting curriculum records: Images and arguments. Lewes: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minister of Public Instruction. (1887).Annual report of the Bendigo School of Mines and Industry to the Minister of Public Instruction. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray-Smith, S., & Dare, A. (1987).The Tech-A centenary history of the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology. Melbourne: Hyland House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, W. (1984). Curriculum topics as institutional categories: Implications for theory and research in the history and sociology of school subjects. In I. Goodson & S. Ball (Eds.),Defining the curriculum: Histories and ethnographies. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrodinger, E. (1945).What is life? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanhope, R. (1961). Recent developments in secondary school science courses in Australia.Australian Science Teachers Journal, 7(3), 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technical Schools Division. (1961).Science syllabus. Melbourne: Education Department of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technical Schools Division. (1963).Leaving general science syllabus. Melbourne: Education Department of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technical Schools Division. (1964).Circular for principals of technical schools, revisions of science syllabus forms 1–4 (T64/620). Melbourne: Education Department of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technical Schools Division. (1966).Technical schools science part I: Form IV Syllabus. Melbourne: Education Department of Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1980 & 1984). Personal communication. (Taped interviews recorded and retained by the author).

  • Turner, J. (1943).General science for Australian schools. Books I and II. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1960–1965 a, b, c, d). Written correspondence with David Cohen held in the author's Technical Schools Archives.

  • Turner, J. (1965). Correspondence with Thomas held in the author's Technical Schools Archives.

  • Tyack, D. (1990). “Restructuring” in historical perspective: Tinkering toward utopia.Teachers College Record, 92(2), 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO International Advisory Committee on the School Curriculum. (1958).Curriculum revision and research. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, G. (1932). A programme for science teaching. In theThirty-first year book of the national society for the study of education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1971).Orwell. London: Fontana/Collins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rod Fawns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fawns, R. The struggle for general science in Australia: The final campaign in the technical schools of the state of Victoria. Research in Science Education 26, 1–22 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356960

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356960

Keywords

Navigation