Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What or where is the ‘nature’ of science teaching?

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ANYON, J. Ideology and United State History Textbooks.Harvard Education Review, 1979, 49 (3), 361–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • APPLE, M.Ideology and Curriculum, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Science Education Project, Newsletter No. 2, November 1972.

  • BARTHES, R.Mythologies London: Cape, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRUNER, J.Toward a Theory of Instruction, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • DANIEL, F. and TURNER, J.S..General Science for Australian Schools, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1943-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAWNS, R.The Place of ASEP in the Development of Science Education in Victoria: A Report on the Background Mapping of Key Units in the Redevelopment of ASEP, unpublished report, Curriculum Development Centre, 1982.

  • GIROUX, H.A.. Schooling and the culture of positivism: Notes on the death of history.Educational theory 1979, 29(4), 263–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • HURD, P.New Directions in Teaching Secondary School Science, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • JAMES, A.V.G. and ROWNEY, G.E.P.New General Science, Melbourne: Cheshire, 1954-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLIEBARD, H.M. Persistent curriculum issues in historical perspective. In E.C. Short (ed.),A Search for Valid Content for Curriculum Courses Ohio: University of Toledo, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • LUGG, D. (ed.).Getting Science Across, Melbourne: Cheshire, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • LUGG, D. and ROWNEY, G.Pursuit of Science, Melbourne: Cheshire, 1964-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • PHILLIPS, M.E. and COX, L.E.The Teaching of Biology, London: University of London Press, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • RORTY, R.Philosophy And The Mirror Of Nature, Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSZAK T. The Monster and the Titan: Science, Knowledge and Gnosis,Daedalus 103, 1974, 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHWAB, J.J. The Teaching of Science as Enquiry. In P. Brandwein and J. Schwab, (eds.),The Teaching of Science, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science Masters Association,The Teaching of General Science, Interim Report, London: Murray, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • SMOLICZ, J.J.Man's Coercion of Nature: A Historical and Sociological Perspective. Australian Science Education Project, 1971.

  • WESTAWAY, F.W.,Science Teaching — What It Was — What It Is — What It Might Be, London: Blackie, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • WILLIAMS, R.The Long Revolution, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • WILLIAMS, R.Problems in Materialism and Culture: Selected Essays, London: Verso, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • YOUNG, M.Knowledge and Control, London: Collier Macmillan, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Rod A. Fawns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fawns, R.A. What or where is the ‘nature’ of science teaching?. Research in Science Education 12, 144–153 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357026

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357026

Keywords

Search

Navigation