Skip to main content
Log in

Gender-inclusive technology materials for the primary school: A case study in curriculum development

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes how an idea for technology education materials developed into a process for producing unique curriculum modules for teaching technology in a gender-inclusive way to primary children. Using a case-study format, the paper describes the interaction between participants, the sequential evolution of the materials themselves and the degree to which success was achieved in terms of the original goals. The study demonstrates how an awareness of gender bias needs to be a feature from the earliest stages of curriculum development, through to the trialling and modification stages. The curriculum materials were a product of effective cooperation between teachers, science educators and community representatives. They utilise a “process” approach to the teaching of technology and in this presentation, we demonstrate how this same approach is a useful framework for describing this particular curriculum development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fricke, G.L. (1987). (Chair). Report to the Commission on Technology Education for the State of New Jersey. Technology Education:Learning how to learn in a technological world. New Jersey, USA.

  • Kinnear, A., Treagust, D., Rennie, L., Lewis, C. (1989).Technology education for upper primary grades. A report prepared for the Schools Technology Group and the Curriculum Development Centre.

  • Rennie, L., Treagust, D., Kinnear, A. (1992) An evaluation of curriculum materials for teaching technology as a design process.Research in Science & Technology Education (in press).

  • Williams, R. (1991) Technology in context. In L. J. Rennie, L. H. Parker, & G. M. Hildebrand, (Eds).Action for Equity, The Second Decade, Contributions to the Sixth International GASAT Conference. (Vol. II) pp 789–806. National Key Centre for Science and Mathematics.

  • Willoughby, K. (1990)Technology choice. A critique of the appropriate technology movement. Westview Press, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Specializations: primary science and technology education, gender issues.

Specializations: diagnosis of student learning and teaching for conceptual change, technology education, curriculum evaluation.

Specializations: affective aspects of science and technology education, gender issues.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kinnear, A., Treagust, D. & Rennie, L. Gender-inclusive technology materials for the primary school: A case study in curriculum development. Research in Science Education 21, 224–233 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02360476

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02360476

Keywords

Navigation