Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of ammonium toxicity at different constatn pH of the nutrient solution

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seedlings of 14 species were grown for 14–28 days on nutrient solution with 6 mmol.l−1 NH4 as the sole nitrogen source. Solutions acidity was were kept constant at pH 4.0, 5.0, 6.0 and 7.0 by continuous titration with diluted KOH. The following species were used: barley, maize, oats sorghum, yellow and white lupin, pea, soybean, carrot, flax, castor-oil, spinach, sugarbeet and sunflower. Most plant species grew optimally at pH 6.0 with slight reductions at pH 5.0. Growth of many species was severely inhibited at pH 4.0, but this inhibition was not observed with the legume and cereal species. Yield depressions at pH 4.0 relative to pH 6.0 were well correlated with the respective relative decreases of the K concentration in their roots (P<0.002). In the roots of two species (sunflower and flax) total N concentrations were also strongly reduced at pH 4.0. apparently, the interactions between uptake of K, NH4 and H ions become the prevalent problem at suboptimal pH. At pH 7.0, yields were also considerably decreased, with the exception of the lupines. At this pH, the roots of the growth inhibited plants were characterized by increased levels of total N and free NH4. It is thought that the binding capacity of the roots for NH4 is an important factor in preventing NH4/NH3 toxicity at supraoptimal pH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker A V, and Mills H A 1980 Ammonium an nitrate nutrition of horticultural crops. Hort. Rev. 2, 395–423.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennet A C and Adams F 1970 Concentration of NH3(aq) required for incipient NH3 toxicity to seedlings. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34, 259–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findenegg G R, Van Beusichem M L and Keltjens W G 1986 Proton balance of plants: physiological, agronomical and ecological implications. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 34, 371–379.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fried M, Zsoldos F, Vose P B and Shatokhin I L 1965 Characterizing the NO3 and NH4 uptake process of rice roots by the use of15N-labelled NH4/NO3 Physiol. Plant. 18, 313–320.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Givan C V 1979 Metabolic detoxification of ammonia in tissues of higher plants. Phytochemistry 18, 375–382.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutschick VP 1981 Evolved strategies in nitrogen acquisition by plants. Amer. Naturalist 118, 607–637.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hageman R H 1980 Effect of form of nitrogen on plant growth.In Nitrification inhibitors, potentials and limitations. Eds. J J Meisinger, G W Randall and M L Vitosh. Spec. Publ. Amer. Soc. Agron, Madison, 38, 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lungk A 1970 Wechselwirkungen zwischen Stickstoffkonzentration (NH4, NH4NO3 and NO3) und pH der Nährlösung auf Wuchs und Ionenhaushalt von Tomatenpflanzen. Gartenbauwissenschaft 35, 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycklama J 1963 The absorption of ammonium and nitrate by perennial rye grass. Acta Bot. Neerl. 12, 361–423.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus-Wyner L 1983 Influence of ambient acidity on the absorption of NO 3 and NH +4 by tomato plants. J. Plant Nutr. 6, 657–666.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard D N and Barker A V 1969 Studies on the tolerance of plants to ammonium nutrition. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 94, 235–239.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mengel K, Viro M and Hehl G 1976 Effect of potassium on uptake and incorporation of ammonium nitrogen of rice plants. Plant and Soil 44, 547–558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mevius W and Engel H 1931 Die Wirkung der Ammoniumsalze in ihrer Abhängigkeit von der Wasserstoffionenkonzentration II. Planta 9, 1–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn D A and Jackson W A 1978 Nitrate and ammonium uptake by rooted cuttings of sweet potato. Agron. J. 70, 312–316.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ragab S M 1980 Effect of ammonium on anion uptake and transport potential in sunflower roots. J. Agric. Sci. 94, 479–482.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reisenauer H M 1978 Absorption and utilization of ammonium nitrogen by plants.In Nitrogen in the environment. Eds. Nielsen D R and MacDonald J G. Vol. 2, pp 157–189 Acad. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolley-Henry L and Raper C D, Jr1986 Utilization of ammonium as a nitrogen source. Effects of ambient acidity on growth and nitrogen accumulation by soybean. Plant Physiol. 82, 54–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend L R 1969 Influence of form of nitrogen and pH on growth and nutrient levels in leaves and roots of lowbush blueberry. Can. J. Plant Sci. 49, 333–338.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich W R, Larsson M, Larsson C M, Lesch S and Novacky A 1984 Ammonium uptake inLemna gibba G1, related membrane potential changes and inhibition of anion uptake. Physiol. Plant. 61, 369–376.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Beusichem M L and Neeteson J J 1982 Urea nutrition of young maize and sugarbeet plants with emphasis on ionic balance and vascular transport of nitrogenous compounds. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 30, 317–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman G S 1950 Growth and N-absorption of seedlings as influenced by the ammonium nitrate ratio and hydrogen ion concentration. Am. J. Bot. 37, 725–738.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Findenegg, G.R. A comparative study of ammonium toxicity at different constatn pH of the nutrient solution. Plant Soil 103, 239–243 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02370395

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02370395

Key words

Navigation