Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A regional framework for establishing recovery criteria

  • Section 3: The Problem Of Spatial-Temporal Variability
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effective assessments of aquatic ecosystem recovery require ecologically sound endpoints against which progress can be measured. Site-by-site assessments of end points and potential recovery trajectories are impractical for water resource agencies. Because of the natural variation among ecosystems, applying a single set of criteria nationwide is not appropriate either. This article demonstrates the use of a regional framework for stratifying natural variation and for determining realistic biological criteria. A map of ecoregions, drawn from landscape characteristics, formed the framework for three statewide case studies and three separate studies at the river basin scale. Statewide studies of Arkansas, Ohio, and Oregon, USA, streams demonstrated patterns in fish assemblages corresponding to ecoregions. The river basin study in Oregon revealed a distinct change at the ecoregion boundary; those in Ohio and Montana demonstrated the value of regional reference sites for assessing recovery. Ecoregions can be used to facilitate the application of ecological theory and to set recovery criteria for various regions of states or of the country. Such a framework provides an important alternative between site-specific and national approaches for assessing recovery rates and conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Arkansas DPCE. 1988. Regulation establishing water quality standards for surface waters of the state of Arkansas. Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology. Little Rock, Arkansas. 77 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovee, K. D., and R. T. Milhous. 1978. Hydraulic simulation in instream flow studies: theory and techniques. Instream Flow Information Paper Number 5, Cooperative Instream Flow Service Group. US Fish and Wildlife Service. Fort Collins, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. P., and R. M. Hughes. 1988. Guidelines for assessing the biotic communities of freshwater wetlands. Pages 276–282in J. A. Kusler, M. Quammen, and G. Brooks (eds.), Proceedings, National Wetlands Mitigation Symposium. Association of State Wetland Managers, Berne, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. E., D. White, and A. L. Schaedel. 1990. Oregon ecological regions and subregions for water quality management.Environmental Management (submitted).

  • Clements, F. E. 1916. Plant succession, an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 242. 512 pp.

  • Gallant, A. L., T. R. Whittier, D. P. Larsen, J. M. Omernik, and R. M. Hughes. 1989. Regionalization as a tool for managing environmental resources. US Environmental Protection Agency. Corvallis, Oregon, EPA/600/3-89/060. 152 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammon, J. R. 1989. The fish populations of the Middle Wabash River, 1973–1988. Progress report to Indiana Public Service and Eli Lilly Co. Biology Department, De Pauw University, Greencastle, Indiana. 86 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G., Jr. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York. 298 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, C. R. 1980. Zoogeographic factors in relation to biological monitoring of fish. Pages 309–356in C. H. Hocutt and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. (eds.), Biological monitoring of fish. D.C. Heath and Company, Lexington, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, O. T., and J. R. Karr. 1978. Habitat structure and stream fish communities.Ecology 59:507–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, S., A. B. Allen, B. Abbruzzesse, M. E. Kentula, and R. M. Hughes. 1988. A method for the selection of reference wetlands. Pages 289–291in Proceedings of the Society of Wetlands Scientists' Eighth Annual Meeting. 26–29 May 1987. Seattle, Washington.

  • Herbertson, A. J. 1905. The major natural regions: an essay in systematic geography.Geographical Journal 25:300–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocutt, C. H., and E. O. Wiley. 1986. The zoogeography of North American freshwater fishes. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 866 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M. 1985. Use of watershed characteristics to select control streams for estimating effects of metal mining wastes on extensively disturbed streams.Environmental Management 9:253–262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M., and J. R. Gammon. 1987. Longitudinal changes in fish assemblages and water quality in the Willamette River, Oregon.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116:196–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M., and D. P. Larsen. 1988. Ecoregions: an approach to surface water protection.Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 60:486–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M., D. P. Larsen, and J. M. Omernik. 1986. Regional reference sites: a method for assessing stream potentials.Environmental Management 10:629–635.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M., E. Rexstad, and C. E. Bond. 1987. The relationship of aquatic ecoregions, river basins, and physiographic graphic provinces to the ichthyogeographic regions of Oregon.Copeia 1987:423–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judy, R. D., Jr., P. N. Seeley, T. M. Murray, S. C. Svirsky, M. R. Whitworth, and L. S. Ischinger. 1984. National fisheries survey, vol. I, technical report: initial findings. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. FWS/OBS-84/06. 141 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., and D. R. Dudley. 1981. Ecological perspective on water quality goals.Environmental Management 5:55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., R. C. Heidinger, and E. H. Helmer. 1985. Effects of chlorine and ammonia from wastewater treatment facilities on biotic integrity.Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 57:912–915.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., K. D. Fausch, P. L. Angermeier, P. R. Yant, and I. J. Schlosser. 1986. Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication 5. Champaign, Illinois. 28 pp.

  • Larsen, D. P., J. M. Omernik, R. M. Hughes, D. R. Dudley, C. M. Rohm, T. R. Whittier, A. L. Kinney, and A. L. Gallant. 1986. The correspondence between spatial patterns in fish assemblages in Ohio streams and aquatic ecoregions.Environmental Management 10:815–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, W. J. 1986. Fish faunal ‘breaks’ and stream order in the eastern and central United States.Environmental Biology of Fishes 17:81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. L., P. M. Leonard, R. M. Hughes, J. R. Karr, P. B. Moyle, L. H. Schrader, B. A. Thompson, R. A. Daniels, K. D. Fausch, G. A. Fitzhugh, J. R. Gammon, D. B. Halliwell, P. L. Angermeier, and D. J. Orth. 1988. Regional applications of an index of biotic integrity for use in water resource management.Fisheries 13:12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. R. 1961. Man and the changing fish fauna of the American Southwest.Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 46:365–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. R., J. D. Williams, and J. E. Williams. 1989. Extinctions of North American fishes during the past century.Fisheries 14:22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorff, T., and R. M. Hughes. 1990. Modification of an index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblages to characterize rivers of the Seine Basin, France.Hydrobiologia (submitted).

  • Ohio EPA. 1987. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life, Vol. II, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Columbus, Ohio. 328 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States.Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77:118–125. (map scale 1:7,500,000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pflieger, W. L. 1975. The fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri. 343 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plafkin, J. L., M. T. Barbour, K. D. Porter, S. K. Gross, and R. M. Hughes. 1989. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. Washington, DC. EPA/444/4-89/001. 162 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohm, C. M., J. W. Giese, and C. C. Bennett. 1987. Test of an aquatic ecoregion classification of streams in Arkansas.Journal of Freshwater Ecology 4:127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosgen, D. L. 1985. A stream classification system. Pages 91–95in R. R. Johnson, C. D. Ziebell, D. R. Patton, P. F. Folliott, and R. H. Harme (eds.), Riparian ecosystems and their management: reconciling conflicting uses. USDA Forest Service. General Technical Report RM-120. Fort Collins, Colorado.

  • Smith, P. W. 1971. Illinois streams: a classification based on their fishes and an analysis of factors responsible for disappearance of native species. Illinois Natural History Survey. Biological Notes No. 76. Champaign, Illinois. 14 pp.

  • Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, California, 859 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, R. J. 1988. Modification and assessment of an index of biotic integrity to quantify stream quality in southern Ontario.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45:492–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautman, M. B. 1981. Fishes of Ohio. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, Ohio. 782 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA. 1988. Report of the national workshop on instream biological monitoring and criteria. US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water, Washington, DC. 34 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA. 1989. Nonpoint sources, agenda for the future. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC. 31 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA. 1990. Biological criteria-national program guidance for surface waters. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C. 57 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittier, T. R., D. P. Larsen, R. M. Hughes, C. M. Rohm, A. L. Gallant, and J. M. Omernik. 1987. The Ohio stream regionalization project: a compendium of results. US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon. EPA/600/3-87/025. 66 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittier, T. R., R. M. Hughes, and D. P. Larsen. 1988. The correspondence between ecoregions and spatial patterns in stream ecosystems in Oregon.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45:1264–1278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., J. E. Johnson, D. A. Hendrickson, S. Contreras-Balderas, J. D. Williams, M. Navarro-Mendoza, D. E. McAllister, and J. E. Deacon. 1989. Fishes of North America endangered, threatened or of special concern: 1989.Fisheries 14:2–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NSI Technology Services Corporation, US EPA Environmental Research Laboratory, 200 S.W. 35th Street, 97333, Corvallis, Oregon, USA

    Robert M. Hughes, Thomas R. Whittier & Christina M. Rohm

  2. Environmental Research Laboratory, US EPA, 97333, Corvallis, Oregon, USA

    David P. Larsen

Authors
  1. Robert M. Hughes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas R. Whittier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christina M. Rohm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David P. Larsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hughes, R.M., Whittier, T.R., Rohm, C.M. et al. A regional framework for establishing recovery criteria. Environmental Management 14, 673–683 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394717

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394717

Key words

Search

Navigation