Skip to main content
Log in

The Unitary Association Method of Relative Dating and Its Application to Archaeological Data

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary objective of relative dating techniques is to determine a reliable sequence of archaeological deposits. This task becomes more difficult whenever our research steps beyond individual sites to the study of intercommunity relationships because we need to develop some means of associating unconnected deposits in time. Radiocarbon dating, as a stand-alone method, cannot always be used to draw reliable correlations between sites. The relevance of archaeological dates, including absolute dates, relies ultimately on the determination of artifact or sample associations and their respective superpositional relationships. The Unitary Association Method of Relative Dating is an alternative to seriation methods that is less susceptible to spatial variation and offers analytical strengths needed for regional chronological analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, W. Y., and Adams, E. W. (1991).Archaeological Typology and Practical Reality: A Dialectical Approach to Artifact Classification and Sorting, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiran, R. (1969).Ancient Pottery of the Holy Land, Massada Press, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiran, R. (1978).Early Arad I: The Chalcolithic Settlement and Early Bronze City, Israel Exploration Society, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiran, R. (1985). The transition from the Chalcolithic to the Early Bronze Age. In Aviram, J. (ed.),Biblical Archaeology Today, Proceedings of the International Congress on Biblical Archaeology, 1994, Jerusalem, pp. 108–112.

  • Amiran, R., and Ilan, O. (1996).Early Arad II, Israel Museum and Israel Exploration Society, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, U. (1987). The Early Bronze Age, Chalcolithic and Neolithic periods. In Ben-Tor, A., and Portugali, Y. (eds.),Tell Qiri: A Village in the Jezreel Valley, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, pp. 274–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basalla, G. (1990).The Evolution of Technology (first published 1988); Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, M. J. (1994).Exploratory Multivariate Analysis in Archaeology, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackham, M. (1998). Changing settlement at Tabaqat al-Bûma in Wadi Ziqlab, Jordan: A Stratigraphic Analysis. In Gebel, H. G., Kafafi, Z., and Rollefson, G. O. (eds.),Prehistory of Jordan II. Perspectives from 1996, Studies in Early Near Eastern Production, Subsistence, and Environment 4, Ex Oriente, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, S. (1990).Radiocarbon Dating, British Museum, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, C. E., Kenworthy, J. B., Litton, C. D., and Smith, A. F. M. (1991). Combining archaeological and radiocarbon information: A Bayesian approach to calibration.Antiquity 65: 808–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, C. E., Christen, J. A., Kenworthy, J. B., and Litton, C. D. (1994). Estimating the duration of archaeological activity using14C determinations.Oxford Journal of Archaeology 13(2): 229–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, C. E., Cavanagh, W. G., and Litton, C. D. (1996).Bayesian Approach to Interpreting Archaeological Data. Statistics in Practice (ser. ed., Barnett, V.), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butzer, K. W. (1987).Archaeology as Human Ecology, Reprint (first published 1982), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway, J. A. (1972).The Early Bronze Age Sanctuary at Ai (et-Tell), Vol. 1, Bernard Quaritch, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway, J. A. (1980).The Early Bronze Age Citadel and Lower City at Ai (et-Tell), American Schools of Oriental Research, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambon, A. (1993). Far'ah, Tell el- (North). In Stern, E. (ed.),The New Encyclopaedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land, Israel Exploration Society and Carta, Jerusalem, pp. 433–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V. G. (1925),The Dawn of European Civilization, Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V. G. (1952).Social Evolution, E. A. Watts, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V. G. (1956).Piecing Together the Past: The Interpretation of Archaeological Data, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. L. (1968).Analytical Archaeology, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. W., and Hastorf, C. A. (eds.) (1990).The Uses of Style in Archaeology, New Directions in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowgill, G. L. (1972). Models, methods and techniques for seriation. In Clarke, D. L. (ed.),Models in Archaeology, Methuen, London, pp. 381–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. S. (1978). Independent dating in archaeological analysis. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.),Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, pp. 223–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, W. R. (1993). Interaction, imitation, and communication as expressed in style: The Ucayali experience. In Conkey, M. W., and Hastorf, C. A. (eds.),The Uses of Style in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 82–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, J., and Dethlefsen, E. (1965). The doppler effect and archaeology: A consideration of the spatial aspects of seriation.Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 21(3): 196–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, P., and Baumhoff, M. (1963). The statistical use of artifact distributions to establish chronological sequence.American Antiquity 28(4): 496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dethlefsen, E., and Deetz, J. (1966). Death's heads, cherubs, and willow trees: Experimental archaeology in colonial cemeteries.American Antiquity 31: 502–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vaux, R., (1955). Les fouilles de Tell el-Far'ah, pres Naplouse, cinquieme campagne.Revue Biblique 62: 541–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vaux, R., (1961). Les fouilles de Tell el-Far'ah, rapport preliminaire sur les 7eme, 8eme, 9eme campagnes 1958–1960.Revue Biblique 68: 557–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vaux, R., and Steve, A. M. (1948). La seconde campagne de fouilles à Tell el-Far'ah, pres Naplouse.Revue Biblique 55: 544–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, A. I. (1996). Ceramic micro-seriation: Types or attributes?American Antiquity 61(1): 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1970). Seriation method and its evaluation.American Antiquity 35(3): 305–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1971).Systematics in Prehistory, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1978). Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy.American Antiquity 43: 192–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feathers, J. K. (1997). The application of luminescence dating in American archaeology.Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 4: 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Y. (1992).The Pottery Assemblages of the Sha'ar Hagolan and Rabah Stages of Munhata (Israel), Les Cahiers du Centre de Recherche Français de Jérusalem, No. 6, Paris.

  • Guex, J. (1977). Une nouvelle méthode d'analyse biochronologique.Bulletin Laboratoire Géologie, Université de Laussanne 224: 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guex, J. (1977).Corrélations biochronologiques et asociations unitaires, Presses Polytechniques Romandes, Laussane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guex, J. (1988). Utilizations des horizons maximaux résiduels et biochronologie.Bulletin Laboratoire Géologie, Université de Laussanne 300: 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guex, J. (1991).Biochronological Correlations, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guex, J., and Davaud, E. (1984). Unitary associations method: Use of graph theory and computer algorithm.Computers and Geosciences 10(1): 69–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanbury-Tenison, J. W. (1986).The Late Chalcolithic to Early Bronze I Transition in Palestine and Transjordan, BAR International Series, No. 311, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.

  • Harris, E. C. (1975). The stratigraphic sequence: A question of time.World Archaeology 7: 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. C. (1975). The analysis of multilinear stratigraphic sequences.Scottish Archaeological Review 3: 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. C. (1989).Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy, 2nd ed., Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, S. W. (1984). Excavations at Tell Umm Hammad Esh-Sharqiya in the Jordan Valley 1982.Levant 16: 35–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, S. W. (1986). Excavations at Tell Umm Hammad, 1984.Levant 18: 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, S. W. (1992).Excavations at Tell Umm Hammad 1982–1984, The Early Assemblages (EBI-II) (ser. ed., Betts, A., Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, J. B. (1967).The Foreign Relations of Palestine During the Early Bronze Age, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. N., and Evans, R. K. (1972). A model for classification and typology. In Clarke, D. L. (ed.),Models in Archaeology, Methuen, London, pp. 231–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I. (1978). The spatial structure of material ‘cultures’: A review of some of the evidence. In Hodder, I. (ed.),The Spatial Organization of Culture Duckworth, London, pp. 94–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I., and Orton, C. R. (1976).Spatial Analysis in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hole, F., and Shaw, M. (1967). Computer analysis of chronological seriation.Rice University Studies 53 (3).

  • Kenyon, K., and Holland, T. A. (1982).Excavations at Jericho: The Pottery Type Series and Other Finds, Vol. 4 (ser. ed., Holland, T. A.), British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, K. M., and Holland, T. A. (1983).Excavations at Jericho: The Pottery Phases of the Tell and Other Finds, Vol. 5 (ser. ed., Holland, T. A.), British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klejn, L. S. (1982).Archaeological Typology, BAR International Series 153, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.

  • Klimek, S. (1935). The structure of Californian Indian culture.University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 37: 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L. (1916). Zuni potsherds.Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 18(1): 7–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L. (1963).Anthropology: Culture Patterns and Processes, Harbinger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L., Stark, M. T., and Longacre, W. A. (1996). Alternative procedures for assessing standardization in ceramic assemblages.American Antiquity 61: 116–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, S. A. (1975). Micro-seriation: A Method for Fine Chronological Differentiation.American Antiquity 40: 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuw, S. E. van der, and Torrence, R. (eds.) (1989).What's New? A Closer Look at the Process of Innovation, Unwin Hyman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemon, R. R. (1990).Principles of Stratigraphy, Merrill, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipo, C., and Madsen, M. (1997). The method seriation: Explaining the variability in the frequencies of types. Paper presented at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Nashville, TN.

  • MacNeish, R. S. (ed.) (1970).The Prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, Vol. 3, University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, W. H. (1978). Advances in archaeological seriation.Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, pp. 245–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milke, W. (1949). The quantitative distribution of cultural similarities and their cartographic representation.American Anthropologist 51: 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NACSN (1983). North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature: North American Stratigraphic Code.American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 67: 841–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, C. R. (1980).Mathematics in Archaeology, Collins, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plog, S. (1978). Social interaction and stylistic similarity: A reanalysis. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.),Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, pp. 143–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plog, S. (1980).Stylistic Variation in Prehistoric Ceramics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, D. W. (1979). The effective use of radiocarbon dates in the seriation of archaeological sites. In Berger, R., and Suess, H. E. (eds.),Radiocarbon Dating, University of California, Berkeley, pp. 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995).Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed., Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, I. (1967). Seriation in archaeology. In Riley, C. L., and Taylor, W. W. (eds.),American Historical Anthropology: Essay in Honor of Leslie Spier, Southern Illinois Press, Carbondale, pp. 153–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savary, J., and Guex, J. (1990).Biograph: Version 2.02, Université de Laussanne, Laussanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savary, J., and Guex, J. (1991). BioGraph: un nouveau programme de construction des corrélation biochronologiques basées sur les associations unitaires.Bulletin Laboratoire Géologie, Université de Lausanne 313: 317–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (1996).Formation Processes of the Archeological Record, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schortman, E. M., and Urban, P. A. (eds.) (1992).Resources, Power, and Interregional Interaction, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollar, I., Herzog, I., Rehmet, J., and Greenacre, M. J. (1997).The Bonn Archaeological Statistics Package Version 5.38, Unkelbach Valley Software Works, Remagen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiley, T. L. (1955). The geochronological approach. In Smiley, T. L. (ed.),Geochronology: With Special Reference to Southwestern United States, Physical Science Bulletin No. 2, University of Arizona, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaulding, A. C. (1971). The dimensions of archaeology. In Deetz, J. (ed.),Man's imprint from the past: Readings in the methods of archaeology. Little, Brown, Boston, pp. 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stager, L. E. (1992). The periodization of Palestine from Neolithic through Early Bronze times. In Ehrich R. W. (ed.),Chronologies in Old World Archaeology, 3rd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 22–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. K. (1987). Deposits for archaeologists. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.),Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 11, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 337–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. K. (1992). Interpreting stratification of a shell midden. In Stein, J. K. (ed.),Deciphering a Shell Midden, Academic Press, New York, pp. 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triggs, J. R. (1993). The seriation of multilinear stratigraphic sequences. In Harris, E. C., Brown, M. R., and Brown, G. J. (eds.),Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy, Academic Press, London, pp. 250–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, G. K., and Wilson, S. R. (1978). Procedures for comparing and combining radiocarbon age determinations: A critique.Archaeometry 20(1): 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, G. R., and Phillips, P. (1958).Method and Theory in American Archaeology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blackham, M. The Unitary Association Method of Relative Dating and Its Application to Archaeological Data. J Archaeol Method Theory 5, 165–207 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02427968

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02427968

Key Words

Navigation