Abstract
The usefulness of the M-statistic in odontomorphometric distance analyses was evaluated against a battery of more traditional metrics, which included Mahalanobis' D2, Penrose's shape metric, the Manhattan distance and Delta. Odontometric data used for the analyses were derived from 202 Paraguayan Lengua Indians and 125 contemporary caucasoids. Efron's Bootstrap procedure was used to evaluate the statistical accuracy of the different metrics, when each was applied to the same populations. Additionally, metric stability in the face of reduced sample size, statistical bias resulting from over- and underestimation, and the effects of standardization, were investigated. Our results indicated that Penrose's shape metric rather that the recently introduced M-statistic was the most reliable metric evaluated. Penrose's shape remained the most reliable when sample size was artificially reduced and when raw data were used. Interestingly, Mahalanobis' generalized distance emerged as the least reliable statistics, especially when used on small sample sizes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson T.W., 1958.An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. New York: Wiley.
Atchley W.R., 1980.M-statistics and morphometric divergence. Science 208: 1059–1060.
Bartlett M.S., 1965.Multivariate statistics. In: Theoretical and Mathematical Biology, pp. 201–224. New York: Blaisdell.
Boyce A.J., 1969.Mapping diversity: a comparative study of some numerical methods. In (A.J. Cole, Ed.) Numerical Taxonomy, pp 1–31. London: Academic Press.
Cherry L.M., Case S.M. &Wilson A.C., 1978.Frog perspective on the morphological difference between humans and chimpanzees. Science 200: 209–211.
Cherry L.M., Case S.M., Kunkel J.G., Wyles J.S. &Wilson A.C., 1982.Body shape metrics and organismal evolution. Evolution 36: 914–933.
Corruccini R.S., 1973.Size and shape in similarity coefficients based on metric characters. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 38: 743–754.
Corruccini R.S., 1975.Multivariate analysis in biological anthropology: some considerations. Journal of Human Evolution, 4: 1–19.
Diaconis P. &Efron B., 1983.Computer intensive methods in statistics. Scientific American, 248: 96–108.
Doran G.A. &Freedman L., 1974.Metrical features of the dentition and arches of populations from Goroka and Lufa, Papua New Guinea. Human Biology, 46: 583–594.
Downie N.M. &Heath R.W., 1983.Basic Statistical Methods. New York: Harper and Row.
Efron B., 1979.Computers and the theory of statistics: thinking the unthinkable. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Review, 21: 460–480.
Efron B., 1982.The Jacknife, the Bootstrap and other resampling plans. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Monograph, 38.
Falk D. &Corruccini R.S., 1982.Efficacy of cranial versus dental measurements for separating human populations.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 57:123–127.
Farris J.S., 1972.Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. American Naturalist, 106: 645–668.
Gingerich P.D. &Smith P.H., 1985.Allometric scaling in the dentition of primates and insectivores. In (W.L. Jungers, Ed.) Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, pp 257–272. New York: Plenum Press.
Goose D.H., 1963.Dental measurement: an assessment of its value in anthropological studies. In (D.R. Brothwell, Ed.) Dental Anthropology, pp 125–148. Oxford: Pergamon.
Gould S.J., 1967.Evolutionary patterns in Pelycosaurian reptiles: a factor-analytic study. Evolution, 21: 385–401.
Harris E.F. &Nweeia M.T., 1980.Tooth size of Ticuna Indians, Columbia, with phenetic comparisons to other Amerindians. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 53: 81–91.
Hotelling H., 1933.Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 25: 417–441; 498–520.
Huxley J.S., 1932.Problems of Relative Growth. London: Methuen.
Kieser J.A. &Preston C.B., 1981.The dentition of the Lengua Indians of Paraguay. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 55: 485–490.
Kieser J.A., Groeneveld H.T. &Preston C.B., 1985 a.An odontometric analysis of the Lengua Indian dentition. Human Biology, 57: 611–620.
Kieser J.A., Groeneveld H.T. &Preston C.B., 1985 b.A metric analysis of the South African caucasoid dentition. Journal of the Dental Association of Africa, 40: 121–125.
Kieser J.A., Groeneveld H.T. &Preston C.B., 1985. c.Age related tooth size variation in the Lengua Indians of Paraguay. Zeitschrift fü Morphologie und Anthropologie, 75: 341–348.
Kowalski C.J., 1972.A commentary on the use of multivariate statistical methods in anthropometric research. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 36: 119–132.
Kunkel J.G., Cherry L.M., Case S.M. &Wilson A.C., 1980.M-statistics and morphometric divergence—reply to Atchley. Science, 208: 1060–1061.
Mahalanobis P.C., 1930.On tests and measures of group divergence. Journal and Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 26: 541–588.
Mahalanobis P.C., 1936.On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Science of India, 2: 49–55.
Mahalanobis P.C., Majumdar D.M. &Ras C.R., 1949.Anthropometric survey of the United Provinces, 1941: a statistical study. Sankhya, 9: 89–324.
Mosimann J.E., 1970.Size allometry: size and shape variables with characterization of the lognormal and generalized gamma distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65: 930–945.
Oxnard C.E., 1969.Mathematics, shape and function: a study in primate anatomy. American Scientist, 57: 75–96.
Pearson K., 1926.The coefficient of racial likeness. Biometrika, 18: 105–117.
Penrose L.S., 1954.Distance, size and shape. Annals of Eugenics, 18: 337–343.
Perzigian A.J., 1984.Human odontometric variation: an evolutionary and taxonomic assessment. Anthropologie, 22: 193–197.
Potter R.H.Y., 1972.Univariate versus multivariate differences in tooth size according to sex. Journal of Dental Research, 51: 716–722.
Potter R.H.Y., Yu P.L., Dahlberg A.A., Merritt A.D. &Conneally P.M., 1968.Genetic studies of tooth size factors in Pima Indian families. American Journal of Human Genetics, 20: 89–100.
Rohlf F.J. &Sokal R.R., 1963.Coefficients of correlation and distance in numerical taxonomy. University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 45: 3–27.
Shepard R.N., 1980.Multidimensional scaling: tree fitting and clustering. Science, 210: 390–398.
Sokal R.R. &Sneath P.H.A., 1963.Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and sons.
Sneath P.H.A. &Sokal R.R., 1973.Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman an sons.
Vasicek Z. &Jicin R., 1972.The problem of similarity of shape. Systematic Zoology, 21: 91–96.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Groeneveld, H.T., Kieser, J.A. An evaluation of the M-statistic in human odontomorphometric distance analyses. Int. J. Anthropol. 2, 29–36 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442070
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442070