Skip to main content
Log in

Tooth size and arcadal length correlates in man

  • Published:
International Journal of Anthropology

Abstract

Intra-arcadal mesiodistal and buccolingual tooth size correlations were evaluated in a sample of 125 caucasoids with ideal occlusion. Dental dimensions were corrected for arcade mength (as a measure of jaw size) by a series of regression analyses of each mesiodistal dimension on the sum of the mesiodistal dimensions within each arcade. Regression coefficients of tooth dimension on arcade length were calculated to gain an insight into the dimensional sensitivity of individual teeth to arcade length variation. The data presented here suggest a strong association between arcadal length (jaw size) dependence, and the dimensional stability of individual teeth. When corrected for arcade length, a definite pattern of tooth size correlation emerges: postcanine maxillary and mandibular teeth are negatively correlated to the anterior teeth and are positively correlated to one another. The hypothesis is developed that anterior and postcanine teeth should be viewed as two separate and negatively size-correlated units, beyond the boundaries of the four morphological tooth classes. Recognition of this basic dichotomous size arrangement within each jaw allows for a reassessment of some of the problems associated with hominid dental evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arya B.S., Savara B.S., Thomas D. &Clarkson O., 1974.Relation of sex and occlusion to mesiodistal tooth size. American Journal of Orthodontics, 66: 479–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson G. &Kirveskari P., 1983.Crown size of permanent teeth in Icelanders. Acta Odontologica Scandinavia, 41: 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace C.L., 1967.Environment, tooth form and size in the Pleistocene. Journal of Dental Research, 46: 809–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler P.M., 1939.Studies of the mammalian dentation — differentition of the postcanine dentition. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, London, 109: 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg A.A., 1945.The changing dentition of man. Journal of the American Dental Association, 32: 676–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel D., 1981.An analysys of the Australopithecine dentition. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 55: 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garn S.M., Lewis A.B. &Kerewsky R., 1965.Size interrelationships of the mesial and distal teeth. Journal of Dental Research, 44: 350–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garn S.M., Lewis A.B. &Kerewsky R., 1966.The meaning of bilateral asymmetry in the permanent dentition. Angle Orthodontist, 36: 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich P.D. &Ryan A.S., 1979.Dental and cranial variation in living Idriidae. Primates, 20: 141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich P.D. &Schoeninger M.J., 1979.Patterns of tooth size variability in the dentition of Primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 51: 457–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich P.D. &Smith B.H., 1985.Allometric scaling in the dentition of Primates and Insectivores. In (W.L. Jungers, Ed.) Size and Scaling in Primate Biology. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 257–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein S., Post D. &Melnick D., 1978.An analysis of cercopithecoids odontometrics, 1: the scaling of the maxillary dentition. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 49: 517–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves C.P. &Napier J.R., 1968.Dental dimensions and diet in australopithecines. Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of Anthropology and Ethnological Sciences, 3: 273–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris E.F. &Nweeia M.T., 1980.Tooth size of Ticuna Indians, Colombia, with phenetic comparisons to other Amerindians. American Journal of Pysical Anthropology, 53: 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hylander W., 1975.Incisor size and diet in anthropoids with special reference to Cercopithecidae. Science, 189: 1095–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay R.F., 1975.The functional adaptations of primate molar teeth. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 43: 195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser J.A., 1985.An odontometric analysis of The early Griqua dentition. Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 43: 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser J.A., 1986.Odontogenic polarity and Butler's field theory. Medical Hypothesis, 20: 103–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser J.A., Groeneveld H.T. &Preston C.B., 1985 a.Compensatory tooth size interaction in an preliterate population. Journal of Human Evolution. 14: 739–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser J.A., Groeneveld H.T. &Preston C.B., 1985 b.A metric analysis of the South African caucasoid dentition. Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa, 40: 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser J.A., Groeneveld H.T. &Preston C.B., 1985 c.An odontometric analysis of the Lengua Indian dentition. Human Biology, 37: 611–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser J.A., Groeneveld H.T. &Preston C.B., 1986.On the non-existence of compensatory tooth size interactions in a contemporary caucasoid populatio. Journal of Dental Research, 65: 1105–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolakowski D. &Bailit H.L., 1981.A differential environmental effect on human anterior tooth size. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 54: 377–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leakey L.S.B., Tobias P.V. &Napier, J.R., 1964.A new species of the genus Homo from Olduvai Gorge. Nature, 202: 7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunt D.A., 1969.An odontometric study of mediaeval Danes. Acta Odontologica Scandinavia, 27 (Supplement 55).

  • Mizoguchi Y., 1981.Variation units in the human permanent dentition. Bulletin of the National Science museum, Tokyo (D) 7: 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizoguchi Y., 1983.Influences of the earlier developing teeth upon the later developing teeth. Bulletin of the National Science Museum, Tokyo (D) 9: 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorrees C.F.A. &Reed R.b., 1964.Correlation among crown diameters of human teeth. Archives of Oral Biology, 9: 685–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss M.L., Chase P.S. &Howes R.I., 1967.Comparative odontometry of the permanent postcanine dentition of American Whites and Negroes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 27: 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne R.J., 1967.Some genetic problems in interpreting the evolution of the human dentition. Journal of Dental Research, 46: 945–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirie P.L., 1978.Allometric scaling in the postcanine dentition with reference to primate diets.Primates, 19: 583–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson E.R. &Malhotra S.K., 1975.Mesiodistal crown diameters of the permanent dentition of American Negroes. American Journal of Orthodontics 68: 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J.T., 1954.Prehominid dentition and hominid evolution. Evolution, 8: 324–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scilli P.W., 1979.Size and morphology of the permanent dentition of prehistoric Ohio Valley Amerindias. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 50: 615–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh M. &Nanda R.S., 1972.Prediction of tooth size and its clinical application. Journal of the Indian Dental Association, 44: 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofaer J.A., 1973.A model relating developmental interaction and differential evolutionary reduction of tooth size. Evolution, 27: 427–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sofaer J.A., Bailit H.L. &MacLean C.J., 1971.A development basis for differential tooth reduction during hominid evolution. Evolution, 25: 509–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sofaer J.A., Chung C.S., Niswander J.D. &Runck D.W., 1971.Developmental interaction, size and agenesis among permanent maxillary incisors. Human Biology, 43: 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias P.V., 1955.Teeth jaws and genes. Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa, 10: 88–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias P.V., 1966.The distinctiveness of Homo Habilis. Nature, 204: 953–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias P.V., 1985.Punctuational and phyletic evolution in the hominids. In (E.S. Vrba, Ed.) Species and speciation. Transvaal Museum Monograph, 4: 131–141.

  • Townsend G.C. &Brown T., 1980.Dental asymmetry in Australian aboriginals. Human Biology, 52: 661–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkhaus E., 1983.The Shanidar Neanderthals. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace J., 1978.Evolutionary trends in the early hominid dentition. In (C.J. Jolly, Ed.) Early Hominids in Africa. London: Duckworth, pp. 285–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpoff M.H., 1990.Analogies and interpretation in palaeoanthropology. In (C.J. Jolly, Ed.) Early Hominids in Africa. London: Duckworth, pp. 641–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood B.A., 1981.Tooth size and shape and their relevance to studies of hominid evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 292: 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kieser, J.A., Groeneveld, H.T. Tooth size and arcadal length correlates in man. Int. J. Anthropol. 2, 37–46 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442071

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442071

Keywords

Navigation