Abstract
The population of immigrant communities is often composed of various ethnic groups who may differ in their dentofacial pattern. The objective of this study was to define the dentofacial pattern of Jewish adolescents of Kurdish origin, and to compare it with another ethnic group and with accepted cephalometric norms. Lateral cephalograms of 20 individuals of both sexes, aged 11–13 years, with normal occlusion in the early permanent dentition, were chosen from the Jerusalem Growth Study material. The cephalograms were traced twice and were processed by means of a computer aided cephalometric program. Downs' as well as some other common cephalometric measurements were used for the analyses. Several comparisons were made: a) with an Ashkenazi (East-European Jewish) group; b) with the findings on non-Jewish Iranian youths of similar geographic background as our Kurdish group; c) with classical cephalometric standards. Close similarity was found with the Ashkenazi group and almost identical pattern of the non-Jewish Iranian youths of similar geographic background. The comparison with the classical cephalometric standards indicated a higher FMA, a more convex profile, accompanied by a mild skeletal Class II tendency and mandibular incisor proclination in our sample. Therefore it stands to reason that the classical North American cephalometric standards for its white population are not applicable in their totality for the clinical evaluation of the two Jewish ethnic groups examined. Thus establishment of specific norms for specific groups within a heterogeneous community is indicated. In addition, a tendency to accept a more convex profile as normal, as apparent from the review of the contemporary orthodontic literature, may suggest the desirability for a revision of the accepted strict norms for a harmonious dentofacial pattern.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyropoulus E. and Sassouni, V., 1989.Comparison of the dentofacial patterns for native Greek and American Caucasian adolescents. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 95: 238–48.
Baumrind S. and Miller D.M., 1980.Computer-aided head-film analysis. The University of California San Francisco method. Am. J. Orthod. 78: 41–65.
Ben-Bassat Y., Dinte A., Brin I. B. and Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E., 1992.Cephalometric pattern of Jewish East European adolescents with clinically acceptable occlusion. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 102: 443–448.
Ben-Zvi I., 1976. The exiled and the redeemed. Jerusalem: Yad Ben-Zvi publications 16: 41–9.
Bishara S.E., Abdalla E.M. and Hoppens B.J., 1990.Cephalometric comparisons of dentofacial parameters between Egyptian and North American adolescents. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 97: 413–21.
Bishara S.E. and Fernandez A.G., 1985.Cephalometric comparisons of dentofacial relationships of two adolescent populations from Iowa and Northern Mexico. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 88: 314–22.
Carmelli D. and Cavalli-Sforza L.L., 1979.The genetic origin of the Jews—A multivariable approach. Human Biology 51: 41–61.
Casko J.S. and Shepherd W.B., 1984.Dental and skeletal variation within the range of normal. Angle Orthod. 54: 5–17.
Cohen T., 1971.Genetic markers in immigrants to Israel. Isr. J. Medi. Sci. 7: 12–15.
Cooke M.S. and Wei S.H., 1988.Cephalometric standards for the Southern Chinese. Eur. J. Orthod. 10: 264–72.
Creekmore T.D., Cetlin N.U., Ricketts R.M., Terrell L.R. and Roth R.H., 1992.JCO Roundtable: Diagnosis and treatment planning. J. Clin. Orthod. 26: 585–606.
Davoody P.R. and Sassouni V., 1978.Dentofacial pattern differences between Iranians and American Caucasians. Am. J. Orthod. 73: 667–75.
Downs W.B., 1956.Analysis of dentofacial profile. Angle Orthod. 26: 191–212.
Drumond R.A., 1968.A determination of cephalometric norms for the Negro race. Am. J. Orthod. 54: 670.
Gleis R., Brezniak N. and Lieberman M., 1990.Israeli cephalometric standards compared to Downs and Steiner analysis. Angle Orthod. 60: 35–40.
Hajighadimi M., Dougherty H.L. and Garakani F., 1981.Cephalometric evaluation of Iranian children and its comparison with Tweed's and Steiner's standards. Am. J. Orthod. 79: 192–97.
Hopkins J.B. and Murphy J., 1971.Variation in good occlusion. Angle Orthod. 41: 55–65.
Kowalsky C.J. and Walker G.F., 1972.The use of incisal angles in the Steiner cephalometric analysis. Angle Orthod. 42: 87–95.
Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E.Gingivitis, oral hygiene and dental caries in children of various ethnic descent in Israel. Department of Orthodontics, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, 1977.
Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E., Zilberman Y. and Hazan O., 1977.A comparative study of tooth and dental arch dimensions and sexual dimorphism in Cercassian and Druse children. J. Morph. Anthrop. 68: 298–306.
Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E., Zilberman Y. and Zeevi Z., 1977.A comparative study of tooth and dental arch dimensions in Jewish children of different ethnic descent. I. Kurds and Yemenites. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 44: 437–43.
Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E., Steigman S. and Gudelevitch B., 1978.A comparative study of tooth and dental arch dimensions and sexual dimorphism in Israeli children of Cochin and North African descent. J. Morph. Anthrop. 69: 32–42.
Moore A.W., 1971.Cephalometrics as a diagnostic tool. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 82: 775–81.
Nelken D., 1963. Blood groups in Jewish communities. In (Goldschmidt E, ed.). The genetics of migrant and isolate populations, pp. 18–20. New York: E. William and Wilkins Co.
Platou C. and Zachrisson B.U., 1983.Incisor position in Scandinavian children with ideal occlusion; a comparison with Ricketts and Steiner standards. Am. J. Orthod. 83: 341–53.
Riedel R.A., 1952.The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod. 2: 142–45.
Riolo M.L., Moyers R.E., McNamara J.L. and Hunter W.S., 1974.An atlas of craniofacial growth. Monograph 4 Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 14–21.
Shapiro H.L., 1960.The Jewish People, a biological history. Paris: Unesco 61–82.
Sofer J.A., Smith P. and Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E., 1986.Affinities between contemporary and skeletal Jewish and Non-Jewish groups based on tooth morphology. Am. J Phys. Anthrop. 87: 256–75.
Steiner C., 1959.Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod. 29: 8–29.
Taylor W. and Hitchcock H.P., 1966.The Alabama analysis. Am. J. Orthod. 29: 8–29.
Tweed C.H., 1959.The Frankfort mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod. 24: 121–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Based on a thesis submitted to the graduate faculty, Hebrew University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the DMD degree.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ben-Bassat, Y., Brin, I., Gilboa, I. et al. Dentofacial pattern of two Jewish ethnic groups compared with accepted norms. Int. J. Anthropol. 11, 81–93 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442204
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442204