Skip to main content
Log in

Dentofacial pattern of two Jewish ethnic groups compared with accepted norms

  • Published:
International Journal of Anthropology

Abstract

The population of immigrant communities is often composed of various ethnic groups who may differ in their dentofacial pattern. The objective of this study was to define the dentofacial pattern of Jewish adolescents of Kurdish origin, and to compare it with another ethnic group and with accepted cephalometric norms. Lateral cephalograms of 20 individuals of both sexes, aged 11–13 years, with normal occlusion in the early permanent dentition, were chosen from the Jerusalem Growth Study material. The cephalograms were traced twice and were processed by means of a computer aided cephalometric program. Downs' as well as some other common cephalometric measurements were used for the analyses. Several comparisons were made: a) with an Ashkenazi (East-European Jewish) group; b) with the findings on non-Jewish Iranian youths of similar geographic background as our Kurdish group; c) with classical cephalometric standards. Close similarity was found with the Ashkenazi group and almost identical pattern of the non-Jewish Iranian youths of similar geographic background. The comparison with the classical cephalometric standards indicated a higher FMA, a more convex profile, accompanied by a mild skeletal Class II tendency and mandibular incisor proclination in our sample. Therefore it stands to reason that the classical North American cephalometric standards for its white population are not applicable in their totality for the clinical evaluation of the two Jewish ethnic groups examined. Thus establishment of specific norms for specific groups within a heterogeneous community is indicated. In addition, a tendency to accept a more convex profile as normal, as apparent from the review of the contemporary orthodontic literature, may suggest the desirability for a revision of the accepted strict norms for a harmonious dentofacial pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyropoulus E. and Sassouni, V., 1989.Comparison of the dentofacial patterns for native Greek and American Caucasian adolescents. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 95: 238–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind S. and Miller D.M., 1980.Computer-aided head-film analysis. The University of California San Francisco method. Am. J. Orthod. 78: 41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Bassat Y., Dinte A., Brin I. B. and Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E., 1992.Cephalometric pattern of Jewish East European adolescents with clinically acceptable occlusion. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 102: 443–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi I., 1976. The exiled and the redeemed. Jerusalem: Yad Ben-Zvi publications 16: 41–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishara S.E., Abdalla E.M. and Hoppens B.J., 1990.Cephalometric comparisons of dentofacial parameters between Egyptian and North American adolescents. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 97: 413–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishara S.E. and Fernandez A.G., 1985.Cephalometric comparisons of dentofacial relationships of two adolescent populations from Iowa and Northern Mexico. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 88: 314–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmelli D. and Cavalli-Sforza L.L., 1979.The genetic origin of the Jews—A multivariable approach. Human Biology 51: 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casko J.S. and Shepherd W.B., 1984.Dental and skeletal variation within the range of normal. Angle Orthod. 54: 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen T., 1971.Genetic markers in immigrants to Israel. Isr. J. Medi. Sci. 7: 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke M.S. and Wei S.H., 1988.Cephalometric standards for the Southern Chinese. Eur. J. Orthod. 10: 264–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creekmore T.D., Cetlin N.U., Ricketts R.M., Terrell L.R. and Roth R.H., 1992.JCO Roundtable: Diagnosis and treatment planning. J. Clin. Orthod. 26: 585–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davoody P.R. and Sassouni V., 1978.Dentofacial pattern differences between Iranians and American Caucasians. Am. J. Orthod. 73: 667–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs W.B., 1956.Analysis of dentofacial profile. Angle Orthod. 26: 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drumond R.A., 1968.A determination of cephalometric norms for the Negro race. Am. J. Orthod. 54: 670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleis R., Brezniak N. and Lieberman M., 1990.Israeli cephalometric standards compared to Downs and Steiner analysis. Angle Orthod. 60: 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajighadimi M., Dougherty H.L. and Garakani F., 1981.Cephalometric evaluation of Iranian children and its comparison with Tweed's and Steiner's standards. Am. J. Orthod. 79: 192–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins J.B. and Murphy J., 1971.Variation in good occlusion. Angle Orthod. 41: 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalsky C.J. and Walker G.F., 1972.The use of incisal angles in the Steiner cephalometric analysis. Angle Orthod. 42: 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E.Gingivitis, oral hygiene and dental caries in children of various ethnic descent in Israel. Department of Orthodontics, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, 1977.

  • Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E., Zilberman Y. and Hazan O., 1977.A comparative study of tooth and dental arch dimensions and sexual dimorphism in Cercassian and Druse children. J. Morph. Anthrop. 68: 298–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E., Zilberman Y. and Zeevi Z., 1977.A comparative study of tooth and dental arch dimensions in Jewish children of different ethnic descent. I. Kurds and Yemenites. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 44: 437–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E., Steigman S. and Gudelevitch B., 1978.A comparative study of tooth and dental arch dimensions and sexual dimorphism in Israeli children of Cochin and North African descent. J. Morph. Anthrop. 69: 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore A.W., 1971.Cephalometrics as a diagnostic tool. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 82: 775–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelken D., 1963. Blood groups in Jewish communities. In (Goldschmidt E, ed.). The genetics of migrant and isolate populations, pp. 18–20. New York: E. William and Wilkins Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platou C. and Zachrisson B.U., 1983.Incisor position in Scandinavian children with ideal occlusion; a comparison with Ricketts and Steiner standards. Am. J. Orthod. 83: 341–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedel R.A., 1952.The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod. 2: 142–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riolo M.L., Moyers R.E., McNamara J.L. and Hunter W.S., 1974.An atlas of craniofacial growth. Monograph 4 Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro H.L., 1960.The Jewish People, a biological history. Paris: Unesco 61–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofer J.A., Smith P. and Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E., 1986.Affinities between contemporary and skeletal Jewish and Non-Jewish groups based on tooth morphology. Am. J Phys. Anthrop. 87: 256–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner C., 1959.Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod. 29: 8–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor W. and Hitchcock H.P., 1966.The Alabama analysis. Am. J. Orthod. 29: 8–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweed C.H., 1959.The Frankfort mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod. 24: 121–69.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Based on a thesis submitted to the graduate faculty, Hebrew University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the DMD degree.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-Bassat, Y., Brin, I., Gilboa, I. et al. Dentofacial pattern of two Jewish ethnic groups compared with accepted norms. Int. J. Anthropol. 11, 81–93 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442204

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02442204

Key words

Navigation