Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of two methods in satellite formation flying

  • Published:
Applied Mathematics and Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, the research of dynamics and control of the satellite formation flying has been attracting a great deal of attentions of the researchers. The theory of the research was mainly based on Clohessy-Wiltshire's (C-W's) equations, which describe the relative motion between two satellites. But according to some special examples and qualitative analysis, neither the initial parameters nor the period of the solution of C-W's equations accord with the actual situation, and the conservation of energy is no longer held. A new method developed from orbital element description of single satellite, named relative orbital element method (ROEM), was introduced. This new method, with clear physics conception and wide application range, overcomes the limitation of C-W's equation, and the periodic solution is a natural conclusion. The simplified equation of the relative motion is obtained when the eccentricity of the main satellite is small. Finally, the results of the two methods (C-W's equation and ROEM) are compared and the limitations of C-W's equations are pointed out and explained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LIN Lai-xing. Study on virtual spacecraft composed by micro-spacecrafts formation flying[A]. In: LIN Lai-xing Ed.Proceedings of Micro-Spacecrafts Formation Flying and Application[C]. Beijing: Committee of Experts of National High Technology, Micro-Satellite Technology Group, July, 2002, 1–35. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. XIAO Ye-lun, ZHANG Xiao-ming. The dynamics characteristic and orbit design of micro-spacecrafts formation flying[A]. In: LIN Lai-xing Ed.Proceedings of Micro-Spacecrafts Formation Flying and Application [C]. Beijing: Committee of Experts of National High Technology, Micro-Satellite Technology Group, July, 2002, 133–144. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. David Folta, Francesco Bordi, Christopher Scolese. Considerations on formation flying separation for earth observing satellite missions[J]. AAS 92-144.Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 1992,79 (2): 803–822.

    Google Scholar 

  4. David Weidow, John Bristow. NASA/DoD university nano-satellites for distributed spacecraft control[A]. In:SSC99-V-5 13th AIAA/USU Small Satellite Conference[C]. Logan, Utah, 1999, 23–26.

  5. Clohessy W H, Wiltshire R S. Terminal guidance system for satellite rendezvous[J].Journal of the Aerospace Science, 1960,27, 653–674.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Yan Q, Kapila V, Sparks A G. Pulse-based periodic control for spacecraft formation flying[A]. In:Proceedings of the American Control Conference[C]. Chicago, Illinois, 2000, 374–378.

  7. Kapila V, Sparks A G, Buffington J M,et al. Spacecraft formation flying: dynamics and control [A]. In:Proceedings of the American Control Conference [C]. San Diego, California, 1999, 4137–4141.

  8. YANG Wei-lian. A new method to solve relative motion of satellite[J].China Space Science and Technology, 1999,20 (6): 20–26. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. ZHANG Xiao-min. Studies on dynamics and control of spacecraft relative orbital motion[D]. [Doctoral thesis]. Beijing: Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2000. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. ZHANG Ren-wei.Dynamics and Control of Orbit and Attitude of Spacecraft [M]. Beijing: Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Press, 1998, 1–7. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  11. GAO Yun-feng. The research of relative orbital dynamics of satellite formation flying[D]. [Doctoral thesis]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2001. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. YANG Jia-chi.Dynamics and Control of Orbit of Spacecraft[M]. Beijing: Aerospace Press, 1995, 52–54. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. CHENG Yu-shn, TANG Yun, ZHENG Zhao-chang, et al.The Advance Analysis Method for Non-Linear Dynamics[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1992, 10–30. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering Mechanics, Tsinghua University, 100084, Beijing, PR China

    Gao Yun-feng, Baoyin He-xi & Li Jun-feng

Authors
  1. Gao Yun-feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Baoyin He-xi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Li Jun-feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Communicated by ZHENG Quan-shui

Foundation items: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (10202008); the Post-Doctoral Science Foundation of China ((2001)31)

Biography: GAO Yun-feng (1967≈), Associate Professor, Doctor (E-mail: gaoyunfeng@tsinghua.edu.cn)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yun-feng, G., He-xi, B. & Jun-feng, L. Comparison of two methods in satellite formation flying. Appl Math Mech 24, 902–908 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02446495

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02446495

Key words

Chinese Library Classification

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation