Abstract
The stochastic processes of postural center-of-pressure profiles were examined in 3- and 5-year-old children, young adult students (mean 20 years), and an elderly age group (mean 67 years). Subjects stood still in an upright bipedal stance on a force platform under vision and nonvision conditions. The time evolutionary properties of the center-of-pressure dynamic were examined using basic stochastic process models. The amount of motion of the center of pressure decreased with increments of age from 3 to 5 years to young adult but increased again in the elderly age group. The availability of vision decreased the amount of motion of the center of pressure in all groups except the 3-year-old group, where there was less motion of the center of pressure with no vision. The stochastic properties of the center-of-pressure dynamic were assessed using both a two-process, random-walk model of Collins and De Luca and an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model that is linear and has displacement governed only by a single stiffness term in the random walk. The two-process open- and closed-loop model accounted for about 96% and the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model 92% of the variance of the diffusion term. Diffusion parameters in both models showed that the data were correlated and that they varied with age in a fashion consistent with developmental accounts of the changing regulation of the degrees of freedom in action. The findings suggest that it is premature to consider the trajectory of the center-of-pressure as a two-process, open- and closed-loop random-walk model given that: (a) the linear Ornstein-Uhlenbeck dynamic equation with only two parameters accommodates almost as much of the variance of the random walk; and (b) the linkage of a discontinuity in the diffusion process with the transition of open- to closed-loop processes is poorly founded. It appears that the nature of the stochastic properties of the random walk of the center-of-pressure trajectory in quiet, upright standing remains to be elucidated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berg HC (1983) Random walks in biology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Bernstein NA (1967) Co-ordination and the regulation of movements. Pergamon, London
Carlton LG (1992) Visual processing time and the control of movement. In: Proteau L, Elliott D (eds) Vision and motor control, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 3–32
Carroll JP, Freedman W (1993) Nonstationarity properties of postural sway. J Biomech 26: 409–416
Collins JJ, De Luca CJ (1993) Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: A random-walk analysis of center of pressure trajectories. Exp Brain Res 95: 308–318
Collins JJ, De Luca CJ (1994) Random walking during quiet standing. Physic Rev Lett 73: 764–767
Collins JJ, De Luca CJ (1995a) The effects of visual input on open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms. Exp Brain Res 103: 151–163
Collins JJ De Luca CJ (1995b) Age-related changes in open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms. Exp Brain Res 104: 480–492
Emmerik REA van, Sprague RL, Newell KM (1993) Assessment of sway dynamics in tardive dyskinesia and developmental disability: sway profile orientation and stereotypy. Mov Disord 8: 305–314
Gardiner CW (1983) Handbook of stochastic methods. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Goldie PA, Bach TM Evans OM (1989) Force platform measures for evaluating postural control: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehab 70: 510–517
Harris GF, Riedel SA, Matesi D, Smith P (1993) Standing postural stability assessment and signal stationarity in children with cerebral palsy. IEE Trans Rehab Eng 1: 35–42
King MB, Judge JO, Wolfson L (1994) Functional base of support decreases with age. J Gerontol Med Sci 49: M258-M263
Lee D, Aronson E (1974) Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants. Percept Psychophys 15: 529–532
Lipsitz LA, Goldberger AL (1992) Loss of “complexity” and aging. J Am Med Assoc 267: 1806–1809
Murray MP, Seirewg AA, Sepic SB (1975) Normal postural stability and steadiness: quantitative assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57: 510–516
Newell KM, McDonald PV (1994) Learning to coordinate redundant biomechanical degrees of freedom. In: Swinnen S, Heuer H, Massion J, Casaer P (eds) Interlimb coordination: neural, dynamical and cognitive constraints. Academic Press, New York, pp 515–536
Newell KM, Emmerik REA van, Lee D, Sprague RL (1993) On postural stability and variability. Gait Posture 4: 225–230
Newell KM, Slobounov SM, Slobounova E, Molenaar PCM (1995) Short-term nonstationarity and the development of postural control (in press)
Powell GM, Dzendolet E (1984) Power spectral density analysis of lateral human standing sway. J Mot Behav 16: 424–441
Riach C, Hayes K (1987) Maturation of postural sway in young children. Dev Med Child Neurol 29: 650–658
Schmidt RA (1977) Control processes in motor skills. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 4: 229–262
Sheldon JH (1960) On the natural history of falls in old age. BMJ 4: 1685–1690
Slobounov SM, Newell KM (1994a) Dynamics in 3- and 5-year-old children as a function of task constraints. Hum Mov Sci 13: 861–875
Slobounov SM, Newell KM (1994b) Postural dynamics as a function of skill level and task constraints. Gait Posture 2: 85–93
Slobounov SM, Moss SA, Slobounova ES, Newell KM (1995) Aging and time to instability in posture (in press)
Winter DA (1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement (2nd edn), Wiley, New York
Woollacott M, Debu B, Mowatt M (1987) Neuromuscular control of posture in the infant and child: is vision dominant? J Mot Behav 19: 167–186
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newell, K.M., Slobounov, S.M., Slobounova, E.S. et al. Stochastic processes in postural center-of-pressure profiles. Exp Brain Res 113, 158–164 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02454152
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02454152