Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Emerging styles of social control on the internet: Justice denied

  • Essays
  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid growth of the Internet during the past 10 years has resulted in many disagreements over who should have the power to make and enforce the rules of on-line content and conduct and what form, such rules and enforcement should take— informal or formal. The extremes at which each of these potentially complementary systems of social control are currently practiced have contributed to an atmosphere of inconsistency, contradiction, uncertainty, and excessive discretion amongst state agencies, Internet service providers, system operators, and Internet users. If the Internet is to serve as a major communication, entertainment, and information medium in the 21st Century, a system is needed that integrates the strengths of both informal and formal systems of control while respecting the social, intellectual, and political freedom of the Internet community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abemathy, J. 1993. ‘Casting the Intermet: A New Tool for Electronic Newsgathering’,Columbia Journalism Review. 31 (January/February): 56

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, J. 1996. ‘A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace,’The Humanist. 56 (May/June): 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. and B. Barr. 1994. ‘Exploring and Mapping Cyberspace,’Futures. 26 (7): 699–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, M. P. 1984. ‘Social Control From Below,’ Pp. 303–339 in Black, D. (ed.)Toward a General Theory of Social Control: Vol 1. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, M.P. 1984. ‘Social Control in Suburbia.’ Pp. 79–101 in Black, D (ed.)Toward a General Theory of Social Control Vol.2. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. 1989. ‘The Influence of Class Position on the Formal and Informal Sanctioning of White-Collar Offenders,The Sociological Quarterly. 30 (3): 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. 1973. ‘The Mobilization of the Law,’The Journal of Legal Studies, (2): 125–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. 1984.Toward a General Theory of Social Control (Vol.1). New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. 1984.Toward a General Theory of Social Control (Vol.2). New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, D. 1996. ‘House Panel Struggles to Apply Copyright Law to Cyberspace,’Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report. 54 (May): 1387–1389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. 1989. ‘The Critical Discourse on “Social Control”: Notes on the Concepts as Hammer,’International Journal of the Sociology of Law. 17: 347–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Cable News Network. 1997a. ‘Janet Reno, Attorey General: OfThe United States, et Al. v. American Civil Liberties Union, Et Al.’ [http://cnn.com/US/9703/cda.scotus/transcript.html]. March 19, 1997

  • Cable News Network 1997b. ‘What is the Communications Decency Act?’ [http://cnn.com/US/9703/cda.scotus/what.is.cda/]. March 19, 1997

  • Cable News Network. 1997c. ‘Case History: From News Report to Law: The CDA's Route to the Supreme Court.’ [http://cnn.com/US/9703/cda.scotus/case.history/]. March 19, 1997

  • Cable News Network. 1997d. ‘The Case For the Communications Decency Act.’ [http://cnn.com/US/9703/cda.scotus/for/index.html] March 19, 1997

  • Cable News Network 1997e. ‘The Case Against the Communications Decency Act, Brave New Medium: Opponents Say CDA Infringes on Free Speech.’ [http://cnn.com/US/9703/cda.scotus/against.html]. March 19, 1997

  • Cable News Network. 1996. ‘Supreme Court to Consider Internet Indeceny Law’ [http://www pointcast.com]. Web posted at 10⩺30 p.m. EST December 6, 1996

  • Cable News Network. 1996. ‘Judges Rule Against Internet Indecency Law: They Support Free Speech in Cyberspace’ [http://www pointcast.com]. Web posted at 2∶00 p.m. EST June 12, 1996

  • Cable News Network. 1996. ‘What's Indecent on the Internet, and Who Should Decide? On-line Debate Rages As Lawsuit Goes to Court.’ [http://www.pointcast.com]. Web posted at, 1∶00 p.m. EST March 21, 1996

  • Cable News Network Financial Network. ‘Judge Blocks CDA Enforcement Ruling Confuses Issue of “Indecent” Internet Content’. [http://www.pointcast.com]. Web posted at 3∶55 p.m. EST February 16, 1996

  • Cable News Network Financial Network. 1996. ‘ACLU Sues to Block New Telecom Law.’ [http://www.pointcast.com]. Web posted at 2∶35 p.m. EST February 8, 1996

  • Cable News Network. 1996. ‘Congress Passes Landmark Telecom Overhaul Bill: Provisions Include Restrictions on Intemet Smut.’ [http://www.pointcast.com]. Web posted at 9∶45 p.m. EST February 1, 1996

  • Corrado, R. 1992. ‘Introduction,’ Pp. 1–21 in R. Corrado, N. Bala, R. Linden and M. Le Blanc (eds.)Juvenile Justice in Canada: A Theoretical and Analytical Assessment: Toronto: Butterworths

    Google Scholar 

  • Craddock, A. 1997. ‘The Battle for Net Freedom Is Not Over.’ [http://www.wired.com/news/politics/story/2649 html] Web posted at 5∶00 a.m. PST March 19, 1997

  • Dancer. I. 1997. ‘#mIRC Customs: A Guide to IRC Netiquette.’ [http://mirc.stealth.net/mircrulz.htm] Web posted Thursday, August 29, 1997

  • Danziger, J. 1985. ‘Social Science and the Social Impacts of Computer Technology,’Social Science Quarterly, 66 (March) 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L., D. Mcshane, and F. Williams, 1995. ‘Controlling Computer Access to Pornography: Special Conditions for Sex Offenders,’Federal Probation, 59 (2): 43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Dority, B. 1996. ‘Ratings and the V-Chip,’The Humanist. 56 (May/June): 16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, W. 1996. ‘Network Rules of Order: Regulating Speech in Public Electronic Fora,’Media, Culture, and Society, 18: 269–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. 1997. ‘High Court Gets Internet Indencency Case.’ [http://www.boston.com/globe/glohome.html]. March 20, 1997

  • Foucault, M. 1980.Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. (Ed. and Trans.) C. Gordon. New York: Pantheon Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. 1995. ‘Informal Social Control and Community Crime Prevention,’British Journal of Criminology. 35 (4) Autumn: 563–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, G. 1997. ‘Top U.S. court defends Internet freedom,’The Globe and Mail. Friday, June 27, page A1

  • Frauenfelder, M. 1997, ‘S.P.(U.T.U.)M. Shames Spammer Into a Rage’. [http://www.wired.com/news/culture/story/2749.html]. Web posted at 5∶00 a.m. PST March 25, 1997

  • Freedman, B. 1996. ‘The Law of Cyberspace,’The Computer Paper. 9 (8) August: 79

    Google Scholar 

  • Freiberg, A. 1987. ‘Reconceptualizing Sanctions,’Criminology. 25 (2): 223–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, L.L. 1985. ‘The Morality of Law,’ Pp. PAGES in L. Lloyd and M. D. A. Freeman (eds.)Lloyd's Introduction to Jurisprudence. (5th) London: Stevens and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, P 1995. ‘Lover, Sex, and Power on the Cyber Frontier,’The North American Review, (September/October): 44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, G. 1972. ‘Jeremy Bentham,’ Pp. 51–69 in H. Mannheim (ed.)Pioneers in Criminology. (2nd) New Jersey: Patterson Smith

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M. 1996. ‘Measuring the Growth of the Web: June 1993 to June 1995.’ [http://www netget.com/info/growth.html] June 1996

  • Griffiths, J. 1984. ‘The Division of Labor in Social Control’ Pp. 37–67 in D. Black (ed.)Toward a General Theory of Social Control: Vol.1. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, A. 1997. ‘Internet Tests Boundaries of Decency- and Nations,’ [http://www.latimes.com/HOME/BUISNESS/CDA/]. Wednesday, March, 19, 1997

  • Healey, J. 1995. ‘Cashing Over Obscenity in Cyberspace,’Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report. (July 8): 1995

  • Harris, C. 1996.An Internet Education: A Guide to Doing Research on the Internet. New York: Wadsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellwege, J. 1996. ‘Internet Regulation: Lawmakers Try to Tame Cyberspace,’Trial. 32 (January): 11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. 1996. ‘Silencing the Net.’ [http://www..netfreedom org.au/anoid/stncite.htm]. May 1996

  • Kerby, M. 1997 ‘Censoring the Internet,’CAUT Bulletin ACPPU. 9 (February): PAGES

  • Kesterton, M. 1997. ‘Where The Nets Are.’ [http://www.globeandmail.con/docs/news/19970328/Social Studies/FASS28.html]. Friday, March 28, 1997

  • Koch, K. 1984. ‘Liability and Social Structure,’ pp. 95–126 in Black, D. (ed.)Toward a General Theory of Social Control: Vol.1. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, H. 1972.Pioneers in Criminology. (2nd) New Jersey: Patterson Smith

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, H. 1972.Pioneers in Criminology. (2nd) New Jersey: Patterson Smith

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. 1988. ‘Replacing Informal Justice,’ Pp. 1–24 in R. Mathews (ed.),Informal Justice? London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendels, P. 1997. ‘To Stop Using “Planned Parenthood” U.S. Judge Orders Anti-Abortion Site.’ [http://www pointcast.com.] March 21, 1997

  • MIT. 1998. [ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/news.announce.newusers] Post updated January 15, 1998

  • Morrill, C. and C. McKee. 1993. ‘Institutional Isomorphism and Informal Social Control:Evidence From a Community Mediation Center,’Social Problems. 40 (4) November. 445–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Monachesi E. 1973. ‘Cesare Beccaria,’ Pp. 36–51 in H. Mannheim (ed.)Pioneers in Criminology. (2nd) New Jersey: Patterson Smith

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader, L. 1984. ‘From Disputing to Complaining,’ Pp. 71–91 in Black, D. (ed.)Toward a General Theory of Social Control: Vol.1. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • No Author. 1995a. ‘The Accidental Superhighway: A Survey of the Internet,’The Economist. 336 (July 1): survey 1-18

  • No Author. 1995b. ‘Censorship in Cyberspace,’The Economist. 331 (April 8): 16–17

  • OzEmail Ltd. 1997. ‘OzEmail Beginners Guide.’ [http://www.ozemail.com.au/ozemail/beginnersguide/netiquette/index.htm] Web posted January 10, 1997

  • Rinaldi, A. 1996. ‘The Net: User Guidelines and Netiquette.’ [http://www.fau.edu/rinaldi/net/web.html] Web Posted May 1, 1996

  • Reuters Ltd. 1997. ‘Austria Goes Off-Line as Smut War Heats Up.’ [Http://wwwReuters.con.] Web posted at 10∶51 AM EST Tuesday March 25, 1997

  • Rosenberg, R. 1993. ‘Free Speech, Pornography, Sexual Harassment, and Electronic Networks,’The Information Society. 9: 285–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, V. 1996.Netiquette. Bookport Online Edition. San Francisco: Albion Books [http://www.albion.com/IX0963702513.html]

  • Tschabitscher, H. 1997. ‘Netiquette-Email.’ [http://email.miningo.com/library/weekly/aa051797.htm] Web posted on May 17, 1997

  • TWIBP (This Week in Bible Prophecy). 1995. ‘Canada Seeks International Tready to Control Internet.’ [http://www.twibp.com/archives/13/1.html]. May, 1995

  • Vesely, R. 1997. ‘Austrian ISPs Go Dark to Protest Cop Raid.’ [http://www.wired.com/newsi politics/story/2741.html]. Web posted at 2∶50 p.m. PST March 25, 1997

  • Vesely, 1997. ‘Vietnam Net Crackdown Hint at Telecom Struggle.’ [http://www.wired.com/ news/politics/story/2716.html]. Web posted at 2∶53 p.m. PST at March 21, 1997

  • Wilson, J., and G. Kelling. 1982. ‘Broken Windows: The Police and Neighborhood Safety.’Atlantic Monthly. (March): 29–38

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

    Chris Atchison

Authors
  1. Chris Atchison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atchison, C. Emerging styles of social control on the internet: Justice denied. Critical Criminology 9, 85–100 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461039

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461039

Keywords

Search

Navigation