Abstract
This article describes the Quest Atlantis (QA) project, a learning and teaching project that employs a multiuser, virtual environment to immerse children, ages 9–12, in educational tasks. QA combines strategies used in commercial gaming environments with lessons from educational research on learning and motivation. It allows users at participating elementary schools and after-school centers to travel through virtual spaces to perform educational activities, talk with other users and mentors, and build virtual personae. Our work has involved an agenda and process that may be called socially-responsive design, which involves building sociotechnical structures that engage with and potentially transform individuals and their contexts of participation. This work sits at the intersection of education, entertainment, and social commitment and suggests an expansive focus for instructional designers. The focus is on engaging classroom culture and relevant aspects of student life to inspire participation consistent with social commitments and educational goals interpreted locally.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993).Benchmarks for science literacy. NY: Oxford University Press.
Axelsson, A., & Regan, T. (2002, January 29). How belonging to an online group affects social behavior: A case study of Asheron's Call. [Homepage of The Microsoft Research Publications]. Retrieved May 2, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://research microsoft.com/scripts/pubs/view.asp?TR_ID=M SR-TR-2002-07.
Barab, S. A., Dodge, T., Jackson, C., & Arici, A. (2003). Technical report on Quest Atlantis, Volume I, Bloomington NI,Center for Research on Learning and Technology.
Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen, & S. M. Land. (Eds.),Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp. 25–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M. G., & Squire, K. (2001). Constructing virtual worlds: Tracing the historical development of learner practices/understandings.Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 47–94.
Barab, S. A., & Luehmann, A. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation.Science Education, 87(4), 454–467.
Barab, S., Makinster, J. G., Moore, J., Cunningham, D., & The ILF Design Team. (2001). Designing and building an online community: The struggle to support sociability in the Inquiry Learning Forum.Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 71–96.
Barab, S., Schatz, S., & Scheckler, R. (in press). Using activity theory to conceptualize online community and using online community to conceptualize activity theory. Accepted inMind, Culture and Activity.
Barab, S. A., Thomas, M. K., Dodge, T., Squire, K., & Newell, M. (in press). Critical Design Ethnography: Designing for change. To appear inAnthropology and Education Quarterly.
Barab, S. A., Thomas, M. K., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., Goodirch, T., Tuzun, H., & Misanchuk, M. (2002). Quest Atlantis: Creating a community-based, online, meta-game for learning (pp. 235–243).Conference Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences.
Bartle R. (1996).Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Retrieved July 30, 2002, from the World wide Web: http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm
Bers, M. (2001). Identity construction environments: Developing personal and moraal values through the design of a virtual city.The Journal of the Learning Sciences 10(4), 365–415.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds). (2002).How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings.The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.
Bruckman, A. (1998). Finding one's own in cyberspace. In High Wired: On the Design, Use, and Theory of Educational MOOs. Ed. Cynthia Haynes and Jan Rune Holmevik, Ann Arbor, MI: U of Michigan P, 1998. 15–24.
Cassell, J., & Jenkins, H. (1998). Chess for Girls? Feminism and computer games. In J. Cassell & H. Jenkins (Eds.),From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and computer games (pp. 2–45). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Castronova, E. (2001). Virtual worlds: A first-hand account of market and society on the cyberian frontier.CESifo Working Paper Series No. 618. Center for Economic Studies and Institute for Economic Research, California State Univ, Fullerton, December 2001.
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.)Distributed cognitions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Collins, A. (1992). Toward a Design Science of Education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.),Proceedings of the NATO advanced research workshop on new directions in advanced educational technology. (pp. 15–22). Berlin: Springer.
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice.Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730.
Damar, B. (1998).Avatars! Exploring and building virtual worlds on the Internet. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
Dede, C., & Ketelhut, D. (2003, April). Designing for motivation and usability in a Web-based multi-user virtual environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, Il.
Delgado-Gaitan, C., & Trueba, H. (1991). Crossing cultural borders. New York, NY: The Falmer Press.
Dewey, J. (1938).Experience and Education. New York: The Macmillan Publishing Company.
Dick, W., & Cary, L. (1990), The Systematic Design of Instruction, Third Edition, Harper Collins.
Donath, J. (1999) Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollack (Eds.),Communities in Cyberspace. London; New York: Routledge.
Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. J. Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of research for educational communication and technology (pp. 170–198), New York: McMillan.
Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design.Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105–121.
Eden, C., & Huxham, C. (1996). Action research for the study of organizations. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, W. Nord (Eds.),Handbook of organizational studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (pp. 526–542).
Engeström, Y. (1987).Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konultit.
Fine, M. (1996). (Eds.)Disruptive voices: The possibilities fo feminist research. Ann Arbor, MI. The University of Michigan Press.
Finn, J. (1994). The promise of participatory research.Journal of Progressive Human Services, 5(2), 25–42.
Freire, P. (1970/2000)Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
Fullan, M. (1993).Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
Gaver, W. W. (1996). Situating Action II: Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design.Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111–129.
Geertz, C. (1976). From the native's, point of view: On the nature of anthropological understanding. In K. Basso & H. A. Selby (Eds.),Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque, N.M.: U. of New Mexico Press.
Glesne, C. (1999).Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (Second Edition ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
Grills, S. (1998).Doing ethnographic research: Field settings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (1996).Instructional media and technologies for learning (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Herz, J. C. (1997).Joystick nation: How videogames ate our quarters, won our hearts, and rewired our minds. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Jenkins, H. (1998). Voices from the combat zone: Game girls talk back. In J. Cassell & Jenkins, (Ed.), From Barbie to Mortal Combat: Gender and computer games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Katz, J. (2000). Up, up, down, down. Slashdot.org. Originally published November, 30, 2000. (http://slashdot.org/features/00/11/27/1648231.shtml)
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Press.
Kolbert, E. (2001). Pimps and Dragons: How an online world survived a social breakdown.The New Yorker, May 28, 2001.
Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (1996). Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities. In S. Herring (Ed.),Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Koster, R., et al. (2000). The laws of online world design, http://www.legendmud.org/raph/gaming/.
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping science teachers learn project-based instruction.Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 483–498.
Laurel, B. (2001).Utopian entrepreneur. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Laurel, B. (2002, January).Gender and technology: A case study in design research and ethics. Presentation at Indiana University, Bloomington.
Levinson, B. (1998). The social commitment of the educational ethnographer: Notes on fieldwork in Mexico and the field of work in the United States. InBeing reflexive in critical educational and social research. Geoffrey Shacklock and John Smyth, (eds.), London: Falmer Press. 83–109.
McLellan, H. (1996). Virtual realities. In D. Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 457–487). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
McNiff, J. (1995).Action research principles and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
National Research Council. (1999).Designing mathematics or science curriculum programs: A guide for using mathematics and science education standards, Washington, DC. National Academy Press.
Poole, S. (2000).Trigger happy: Videogames and the entertainment revolution, London: 4th Estate.
Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Prensky, M. (2000).Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw Hill.
Provenzo, E. F. (1991).Video kids: Making sense of Nintendo. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Provenzo, E. F. (1992). What do video games teach?Education Digest, 58(4), 56–58.
Randi, J., & Corno, L. (1997). Teachers as innovators. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.),The international handbook of teachers and teaching (Vol. II, pp. 1163–1221). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.),The Handbook of Qualitative Research. (pp. 324–339). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Reid, E. (1999). Hierarchy and power. In M. Smith & P. Kollock, (Eds.),Communities in cyberspace, (pp. 107–133). New York, NY: Routledge Press.
Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.) (1999). Instructional-Design Theories and Models, Volume II: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
Rogers, E. (1995).Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Rogoff, B. (1990).Apprenticeship in thinking, New York: Oxford University Press.
Roth, W.-M. (1998).Designing communities. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.), (1993).Participatory design: Principles and practices, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schwartz, D., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. (1999). Toward the development of flexiblity adaptive instructional design. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design Theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol II, pp. 183–214). Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, New Jersey.
Schwen, T. M., Godrum, D. A., & Dorsey L. T. (1993). On the design of an Enriched Learning and Information Environment (ELIE).Educational Technology, 33(11), 5–9.
Scriven, M. S. (1983). Evaluation methodologies. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven, and D. I. Stufflebeam (Eds.),Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 229–260). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Squire, K. (2002). Cultural framing of computer/video games.The International Journal of Computer Game Research,2(1), Game Studies Available online: http://www.gamestudies.org/0102/squire/Retrieved 12-24-02
Stake, R. E. (1978). The case study method in social inquiry.Educational Researcher, 7(1), 5–8.
Stake, R. E. (1995).The art of case study research Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stringer, E. T. (1996).Action research: A handbook for practitioners, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Turkle, S. (1994). Constructions and reconstructions of self in virtual reality: Playing in the MUDs.Mind, Culture, and Activity 1(3), 158–167.
Turkle, S. (1995).Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Turkle, S., Dennis, P. D., et al. (2000/2002). Tech savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age. In E. Bucy (Ed.),Living in the information age: A new media reader (pp. 262–268). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. (Reprinted report from 2000, Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation).
Vygotsky, L. (1933/1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1986).Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wasson, C. (2000). Ethnography in the field of design.Human Organization, 59(4), 377–388.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education.
Wertsch, J. (1985).Vygotsky and the social information of mind, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Wiggins, G. (1992). Creating tests worth taking.Educational Leadership, 49(8), 26–33.
Willet, R. (2001).Children's use of popular medin in their creative writing. Unpublished dissertation, London: University of London, Institute of Education.
Women's Foundation of Colorado. (1999).Cyberpink: Are software companies selling our girls short? Denver: Women's Foundation of Colorado. Retrieved Nevember 19, 2003, from http://www.wfco.org/pdf/Research%20&%20Publications/Cyberpink%20Report.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a CAREER Grant from the National Science Foundation, REC-9980081 and by the National Science Foundation Grant #0092831.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T. et al. Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. ETR&D 53, 86–107 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504859
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504859