Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computer-based support for curriculum designers: A case of developmental research

  • Development
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we explore the potential of the computer to support curriculum materials development within the context of secondary level science and mathematics education in southern Africa. During the four-year course of the study, a computer program was developed named CASCADE-SEA, which stands for Computer Assisted Curriculum Analysis, Design and Evaluation for Science (and mathematics) Education in Africa. By carefully documenting the iterative process of analysis, prototype design, evaluation, and revision, we sought insight into the characteristics of a valid and practical computer-based tool that possesses the potential to affect the performance of its users. The results of this study include the CASCADE-SEA program itself, which assists users in producing better quality materials than they otherwise might, while they also learn from the development process. Further, this research has contributed to the articulation of design principles and related developmental research methods. This article highlights the research and development that took place, and only briefly addresses the tool itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?Educational Researcher, (25) 9, 6–8, 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Peretz, M. (1990)The teacher-curriculum encounter. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Atkin, J. (Eds.), (1996).Changing the subject: Innovations in science, mathematics and technology education, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracht, G., & Glass, G. (1968). The external validity of experiments.American Educational Research Journal, 5, 437–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caillods, F., Göttelman-Duret, G., & Lewin, K. (1996).Science education and development: Planning and policy issues at secondary level. Paris: unesco/iiep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, J., & Connelly, M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. Jackson (Ed.)Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363–401), New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Feiter, L., Vonk, H., & van den Akker, J. (1995).Towards more effective science teacher development in southern Africa. Amsterdam: VU University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W., & Ponder, G. (1978). The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making.Interchange, 8(3) 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, M., & Borko, H. (1991). In search of an interdisciplinary collaborative design for studying teacher education.Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(2), 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. (1994).The educational imagination (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2001).The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gery, G. (1991).Electronic performance support systems: How and why to remake the workplace through the strategic application of technology, Boston: Weingarten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J., (1994) Curriculum as a field of study. In T. Husén & T. Postlethwaite (Eds.)The international encyclopedia of education (pp. 1262–1267).

  • Guskey, T. (2000),Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A. (1986). Collaborative research: Working with, not working on...Educational Leadership, 43(5), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P., Love, N., & Stiles, K. (1998).Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, C., & Willis, G. (1995).Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenney, S. (2001a).Computer-based support for science education materials developers in Africa: Exploring potentials. Doctoral dissertation. Enschede: University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenney, S. (2001b).The CASCADE-SEA program Website [Online]. Available: http://projects.edte.utwente.nl/cascade/seasite/.

  • McKenney, S. (2001c).The CASCADE-SEA research Website [Online]. Available: http://projects.edte.utwente.nl/cascade/seastudy/.

  • Miller, B. (1997).What is in the realm of possibilities may not be possible [Online]. Available: http://www.pcd-innovations.com/design_ideas.htm.

  • Nieveen, N. (1997).Computer-based support for curriculum developers: A study on the potential of computer support in the domain of formative curriculum evaluation. Doctoral dissertation. Enschede: University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.),Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 125–136). Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieveen, N., & Gustafson, K. (1999). Characteristics of computer-based tools for education and training development: An introduction. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen & T. Plomp (Eds.)Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 155–174). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieveen, N., & van den Akker, J. (1996). Computer supported curriculum development. In T. Plomp & D. Ely (Eds.),International encyclopedia of educational technology (pp. 153–158). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1986). Fidelity in teaching teacher education and research for teaching.Harvard Educational Review, 56(4), 496–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogunniyi, M. (1996). Science, technology and mathematics: The problem of developing critical human capital in Africa.International Journal of Science Education, 18(3), 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raybould, B. (1990). Solving human performance problems with computers.Performance and Instruction 29(10), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T. (2000). Socially responsible educational technology research.Educational Technology 40(6), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R., & Nelson, W. (1996). Developmental research. In D. Jonassen (Ed.),Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1213–1245) London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. (1999). Implementing outcomes based education in South Africa: What lessons can science educators learn from classroom practitioners in New Zealand? InProceedings of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 382–405). Harare: University of Harare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.) (1993).Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seels, B., & Richey, R. (1994).Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1990). Flexibility in the evaluation of emergent programs.Studies in Educational Evaluation, 16, 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G., & Stevens, E. (1995).Designing electronic performance support tools: Improving workplace performance with hypertext hypermedia and multimedia. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taba, H. (1962).Curriculum development: Theory and practice: New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N. (2000).Sustainable change for educational systems in transition. Keynote address at the Designing Education for the Learning Society International conference, Enschede. Available: Http://192.87.215.20/bslo/AnythingNick.doc.

  • Tessmer, M. (1994). Formative evaluation alternatives.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7(1), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessmer, M., & Harris, D. (1990). Beyond instructional effectiveness: Key environmental decisions for instructional designers as change agents.Educational Technology, 30(7), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessmer, M., & Wedman, J. (1995). Context-sensitive instructional design models: A response to design research, studies and criticism.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(3), 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thijs, A. (1999). Supporting science curriculum reform in Botswana: The potential of peer coaching. Doctoral dissertation. Enschede: University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, J. (1994). Designing innovations from an implementation perspective. In T. Husén & T. Postlethwaite (Eds.). The international encyclopedia of education (pp. 1491–1494). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, J. (1996).Het Studiehuis: Ook een leeromgeving voor docenten? [The study house: Also a learning environment for teachers?] (Inaugural address). Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.),Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 45–58). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. (1990).Fundamentals of curriculum. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. & Jonassen, D. (1991). Automated instructional systems design: A review of prototype systems.Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2(2), 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R., (1994). Science teacher education. In T. Husén & T. Postlethwaite (Eds.),The international encyclopedia of education (pp. 5342–5345). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumwalt, K. (1988). Are we improving or undermining teaching? In L. Tanner (Ed.),Critical issues in curriculum (87th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (pp. 148–174). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Curriculum, Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, University of Twente in the Netherlands, Netherlands

    Susan McKenney & Jan van den Akker

Authors
  1. Susan McKenney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan van den Akker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKenney, S., van den Akker, J. Computer-based support for curriculum designers: A case of developmental research. ETR&D 53, 41–66 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504865

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504865

Keywords

Search

Navigation