Abstract
The Internet is increasingly being used as a medium for educational software in the form of miniature applications (e.g., applets) to explore concepts in a domain. One such effort in mathematics education, the Educational Software Components of Tomorrow (ESCOT) project, created 42 miniature applications each consisting of a context, a set of questions, and one or more interactive applets to help students explore a mathematical concept. They were designed by experts in interface design, educational technology, and classroom teaching. However, some applications were more successful for fostering student problem-solving than others. This article describes the method used to mine a subset (25) of these applets for design principles that describe successful learner-centered design by drawing on such data as videos of students using the software and summaries of written student work. Twenty-one design principles were identified, falling into the categories of motivation, presentation, and support for problem solving. The main purpose of this article is to operationalize a method for post hoc extraction of design principles from an existing library of educational software, although readers may also find the design principles themselves to be useful.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977)A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Box, G. E. P. (1979). Robustness in scientific model building. In R. L. Launer & G. N. Wilkinson (Eds.),Robustness in statistics (pp. 201–236), NY: Academic Press.
Card, S. K., Newell, A., & Moran, T. P. (1983)The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (1992) Getting around the task-artifact cycle: How to make claims and design by scenario.Transactions on Information Systems, 10(2), 181–212
Clements, D. H. (2000). From exercises and tasks to problems and projects: Unique contributions of computers to innovative mathematics education.Journal of Mathematical Behavior 19, 9–47.
Dufour-Janvier, B., Bednarz, N & Belanger, M. (1987). Pedagogical considerations concerning the problem of representation. In: C. Janvier (Ed.)Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp 109–122). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (3rd. ed., pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.
Hollebrands, K. F. & Stohl, H. (2004). The interplay between technology design and students' control of problem solving. In D. McDougall (Ed.)Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Psychology of Mathematics Education—North American Chapter (vol. 3, 1481–1487). Toronto.
Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.)A handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515–556). NY: MacMillan.
Nielsen, J. (1994)Usability engineering. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Norman, D. A. (1983) Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.)Mental models (pp. 348). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Norman, D. A. (1992). Design principles for cognitive artifacts.Research in Engineering Design, 4(1), 43–50.
Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986)User centered system design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.)Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 5–29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Renninger, K. A., Sinclair, N., Hand, V. M., Alejandre, S., Stohl, H., & Underwood, J. S. (2003).Interest and motivation for learning mathematics with online interactive challenge problems. Paper presented as part of the symposium, Interest and Motivation for Computer-Based Learning, European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Padova, Italy.
Roschelle, J., DiGiano, C., Koutlis, M., Repenning, A., Jackiw, N., & Suthers, D. (1999). Developing educational software components.IEEE Computer, 32(9), 50–58.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985).Mathematical problem solving. Orlando: Academic Press.
Schön, D. A. (1992). Designing as Reflective Conversation with the Materials of a Design Situation.Research in Engineering Design, 3(3), 131–148.
Simon, H. A. (1969).The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sinclaire, M. P. (2003). Some implications of the results of a case study for the design of pre-constructed, dynamic geometry sketches and accompanying materials,Educational Studies in Mathematics 52(3), 289–317.
Snelbecker, G. E. (1999). Some thoughts about theories, perfection, and instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 31–47). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stohl, H. (2003). Preparing to teach mathematics with technology: Research implications for a learning trajectory.Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2003(1), 2961–2968.
Stohl, H. (in press). Facilitating students' problem solving: Prospective teachers' learning trajectory in a technological context.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This project was funded by a seed grant from the Center for Innovative Learning Technologies funded by the National Science Foundation (REC # 9720384), and was partially supported by Educational Testing Service. Any opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necesarily of Educational Testing Service.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Underwood, J.S., Hoadley, C., Lee, H.S. et al. IDEA: Identifying design principles in educational applets. ETR&D 53, 99–112 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504868
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504868