Skip to main content
Log in

Designing effective instruction

(3rd ed.). Gary R. Morrison, Steven M. Ross, and Jerrold E. Kemp (2001). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001. 369 pp. $73.95. Soft cover. ISBN: 0-471-38795-9

  • Departments
  • Book Reviews
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We have usedDesigning Effective Instruction in introductory ID courses and experienced its use from both the instructors' and the learners' perspective. Our overall conclusion is that it is highly usable and accessible to beginning ID students, including those whose first language may not be English. The ID model presented is clear and the focus on the learner throughout is appropriate and in line with current research emphases and trends. The inclusion of Microsoft Projecttm makes a clear and concrete statement that ID can benefit from technology, not only in the delivery of instruction, but in the planning of structured learning activities and in managing instructional development efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Anglin, G.J. (1999).Critical issues in instructional technology. Englewood, CO: Teacher Ideas of Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, L.J., Gustafson, K.L., & Tillman, M.H. (Eds.) (1991)Instructional design: Principles and applications (2nd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, R.M. (1998).Designing & assessing courses & curricula: A practical guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J.O. (2000).The systematic design of instruction (3rd ed). Glenview, IL: Addision Wesley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R., Briggs, L., & Wager, W. (1992)Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, K.L., & Branch, R.M. (1997).Survey of instructional development models (3rd ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D.H., Hernandez-Serrano, J., & Choi, I. (2000). Integrating constructivism and learning technologies. In J.M. Spector & T.M. Anderson (Eds.),Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction and technology: Understanding complexity (pp. 103–128) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R.C., Fields, D.C., & Foxon, M. (with Roberts, R.C., Spannaus, T., & Spector, J.M.) (2001).Instructional design competencies: The standards (3rd ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seels, B., & Glasgow, Z. (1998).Making instructional design decisions (2nd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, R.N., & Magliaro, S.G. (1997).Mastering the possibilities: A process approach to instructional design. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P.L., & Ragan, T.J. (1999).Instructional design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anglin, G.J. Designing effective instruction. ETR&D 50, 79–83 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504995

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504995

Navigation