Abstract
As the craniospinal space is a pressure loaded system it is difficult to conceptualise and understand the flow dynamics through the ventricular system. Aqueduct stenosis compromises flow, increasing the pressure required to move cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through the ventricles. Under normal circumstances, less than one pascal (1Pa) of pressure is required to move a physiological flow of CSF through the aqueduct. This is too small to measure using clinical pressure transducers. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) program, CFX, has been used to model two forms of aqueduct stenosis: simple narrowing and forking of the aqueduct. This study shows that with mild stenoses, the increase in pressure required to drive flow becomes significant (86–125 Pa), which may result in an increased transmantle pressure difference but not necessarily an increased intraventricular pressure. Severe stenoses will result in both. Wall shear stresses increase concomitantly and may contribute to local damage of the aqueduct wall and further gliosis with narrowing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, D. W., andVinters, H. V. (1984): ‘Hydrocephalus with cerebral aqueductal dysgenesis and craniofacial anomalies’,Acta Neuropathologica,63, pp. 170–173
Basser, P. J. (1992): ‘Interstitial pressure, volume and flow during infusion into brain tissue’,Microvasc. Res.,44, pp. 143–165
Beckett, R. S., Netsky, M. G., andZimmerman, H. M. (1950): ‘Developmental stenosis of the aqueduct of Sylvius’,Am. J. Path.,26, pp. 755–787
Burton, B. K. (1979): ‘Recurrence risks for congenital hydrocephalus’,Clin. Genet.,16, pp. 47–53
Conner, E. S., Foley, L., andBlack, P. McL. (1984): ‘Experimental normal-pressure hydrocephalus is accompanied by increased transmantle pressure’,J. Neurosurg.,61, pp. 322–327
CFX (1996): CFX 4.1 Flow Solver Guide, CFX International, AEA Technology, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX14 0RA, UK
Emery, J., andStaschak, M. (1962): ‘The size and form of the cerebral aqueduct in children’,Brain,95, pp. 591–598
Greitz, D. (1993): ‘Cerebrospinal fluid circulation and associated intracranial dynamics’,Acta Radiol.,386, pp. 1–23
Hoff, H., andBarber, R. (1974): ‘Transcerebral mantle pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus’,Arch. Neurol.,31, pp 101–105
Jacobson, E. E., Fletcher, D. F., Morgan, M. K., andJoshton, I. H. (1996): ‘The fluid dynamics of the cerebral aqueduct’,Ped. Neurosurg.,24, pp. 229–236
Last, R. J., andTompsett, D. H. (1953): ‘Casts of the cerebral ventricles’,Br. J. Surg.,164, pp. 525–543
Lichtenstein, B. W. (1959): ‘Atresia and stenosis of the aqueduct of Sylvius’,J. Neuropath. Exp. Neurol.,18, pp. 3–21
Millen, J. W., andWoollam, D. H. M. (1962): ‘The anatomy of the cerebrospinal fluid’ (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
Ommaya, A. K. (1968): ‘Mechanical properties of the nervous system’,J. Biochem.,1, pp. 127–138
Raimondi, A. J., Samuelson, G., Yarzagaray, L., andNorton, T. (1969): ‘Atresia of the foramina of Luschka and Magendie: the Dandy-Walker cyst’,J. Neurosurg.,31, pp. 202–216
Rekate, H. L. (1989): ‘Circuit diagram of the circulation of cerebrospinal fluid’,Concepts in Ped. Neurosurg.,9, pp. 46–56
Russell, D. S. (1949): ‘Observations on the pathology of hydrocephalus’ (HMSO, London)
Shuck, L. Z., andAdvani, S. H. (1972): ‘Rheological response of human brain tissue in shear’,Trans. ASME. J. Basic Eng.,94, pp. 905–911
Subramanian, R., Neff, S., andRahulkumar, P. (1995): ‘A numerical study of the biomechanics of structural neurological diseases’,inTentner, A. (ed.) Proc. High Performance Computing: Grand Challenges in Computer Simulation (Society for Computer Simulation, San Diego) pp. 552–560
Williams, B. (1973): ‘Is aqueduct stenosis a result of hydrocephalus?’,Brain,96, pp. 399–412
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacobson, E.E., Fletcher, D.F., Morgan, M.K. et al. Computer modelling of the cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics of aqueduct stenosis. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 37, 59–63 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02513267
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02513267