Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study

  • CAIT
  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A computer simulation is used to investigate the relationship between skin impedance and image artefacts in electrical impedance tomography. Sets of electrode impedance are generated with a pseudo-random distribution and used to introduce errors in boundary voltage measurements. To simplify the analysis, the non-idealities in the current injection circuit are replaced by a fixed common-mode error term. The boundary voltages are reconstructed into images and inspected. Where the simulated skin impedance remains constant between measurements, large impedances (>2kΩ) do not cause significant degradation of the image. Where the skin impedances ‘drift’ between measurements, a drift of 5% from a starting impedance of 100Ω is sufficient to cause significant image distortion. If the skin impedances vary randomly between measurements, they have to be less than 10 Ω to allow satisfactory images. Skin impedances are typically 100–200 Ω at 50 kHz on unprepared skin. These values are sufficient to cause image distortion if they drift over time. It is concluded that the patient's skin should be abraded to reduce impedance, and measurements should be avoided in the first 10 min after electrode placement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boone, K. G., andHolder, D. S. (1995a): ‘Assessment of noise and drift artefacts in electrical impedance tomography measurements using the Sheffield Mark I system’,Innov. Tech. Biol. Med.,16, (2), pp. 49–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, K. G., andHolder, D. S. (1995b): ‘A model of the effect of variations in contact and skin impedance on APT measurement artefacts’,-Ibid.,16, (2), pp. 61–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, D. C., andSeagar, A. D. (1987): ‘The Sheffield data collection system’,Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas.,8, (Suppl A), pp. 91–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, L. (1972): ‘Electrodes and the measurement of bioelectric events’, (John Wiley & Sons New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hua, P., Woo, E. J., andWebster, J. G. (1993a): ‘Using compound electrodes in electrical impedance tomography,’IEEE Trans.,BME-40, pp. 29–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Hua, P., Woo, E. J., Webster, J. G., andTomkins, W. I. (1993b): ‘Finite element modelling of the electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography’,-Ibid.,BME-40, pp. 335–43

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, E. A., andJossinet, I. (1990): ‘Electrode-skin impedance in impedance tomography’,Hames, T. J. (Ed.), ‘Proc. Eur. Community Concerted Action on Electrical Impedance Tomography, Copenhagen (Sheffield University Press, Sheffield, UK) pp. 14–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Record, P., Gadd, R., andRolfe, P. (1990): ‘A signal-conditioning electrode for use in electrical impedance tomography.’-Ibid. pp. 168–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Riu, P. J., Lozano, A., andRosell, J. (1990): ‘Errors in tomography systems caused by reactive electrode impedance.’-Ibid. pp. 198–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, E. J. (1990): ‘A finite-element method and reconstruction algorithms in electrical impedance tomography.’ PhD Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boone, K.G., Holder, D.S. Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 34, 351–354 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02520003

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02520003

Keywords

Navigation