Skip to main content
Log in

Inexact Newton methods for the nonlinear complementarity problem

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

An exact Newton method for solving a nonlinear complementarity problem consists of solving a sequence of linear complementarity subproblems. For problems of large size, solving the subproblems exactly can be very expensive. In this paper we study inexact Newton methods for solving the nonlinear, complementarity problem. In such an inexact method, the subproblems are solved only up to a certain degree of accuracy. The necessary accuracies that are needed to preserve the nice features of the exact Newton method are established and analyzed. We also discuss some extensions as well as an application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H.Z. Aashtiani, “The multi-modal traffic assignment problem,” Ph.D. dissertation, Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1979).

  2. R.W. Cottle, S.G. Duval and K. Zikan, “A Lagrangean relaxation algorithm for the constrained matrix problem,”Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 33 (1986) 55–76

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. R.S. Dembo, S.G. Eisenstat and T. Steihaug, “Inexact Newton methods,”SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 19 (1982) 400–408.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. R.S. Dembo and U. Tulowitzki, “Sequential truncated quadratic programming methods,” in Paul T. Boggs, R.H. Byrd and R.B. Schnabel, eds.,Numericla Optimization 1984 (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1985) pp. 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.S. Dembo and U. Tulowitzki “Local convergence analysis for successive inexact quadratic programming methods,” SOM Working Paper, Series B #78, School of Organization and Management, Yale University (Revised October 1984).

  6. J.E. Dennis and J. Moré, “Quasi-Newton methods: Motivation and theory,”SIAM Review 19 (1977) 46–89.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. B.C. Eaves, “Where solving for stationary points by LCPs is mixing Newton iterates,” in B.C. Eaves, F.J. Gould, H.O. Peitgen and M.J. Todd, eds.Homotopy Methods and Global Convergence (Plenum Press, New York, 1983) pp. 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.C. Jones, R. Saigal and M. Schneider, “Computing nonlinear network equilibria,”Mathematical Programming 31 (1985) 57–66.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. N.H. Josephy, “Newton’s method for generalized equations,” Technical Summary Report No. 1965, Mathematics Research Center, University of Wisconsin (Madison, Wisconsin, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N.H. Josephy, “Quasi-Newton methods for generalized equations,” Technical Summary Report No. 1966, Mathematics Research Center, University of Wisconsin (Madison, Wisconsin, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. N.H. Josephy, “A Newton method for the PIES energy model,” Technical Summary Report No. 1977, Mathematics Research Center, University of Wisconsin (Madison, Wisconsin, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Mathiesen, “Computational experience in solving equilibrium models by a sequence of linear complementarity problems,”Operations Research 33 (1985) 1225–1250.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Ortega and W.C. Rheinboldt,Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables (Academic Press, New York, 1970).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. J.S. Pang, “Solution of the general multicommodity spatial equilibrium problems by variational and complementarity methods,”Journal of Regional Science 24 (1984) 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J.S. Pang, “More results on the convergence of iterative methods for the symmetric linear complementarity problem,” to appear inJournal of Optimization Theory and Applications.

  16. J.S. Pang and D. Chan, “Iterative methods for variational and complementarity problems,”Mathematical Programming 24 (1982) 284–313.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. J.S. Pang and C.S. Yu, “Linearized simplicial decomposition methods for computing traffic equilibria on networks,”Networks 14 (1984) 427–438.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. P.V. Preckel, “Alternative algorithms for computing economic equilibria,” manuscript, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University (West Lafayette, Indiana, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S.M. Robinson, “Perturbed Kuhn-Tucker points and rates of convergence for a class of nonlinear programming algorithms,”Mathematical Programming 7 (1974) 1–16.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. S.M. Robinson, “An implicit-function theorem for generalized variational inequalities,” Technical Summary Report No. 1672, Mathematics Research Center, University of Wisconsin (Madison, Wisconsin, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S.M. Robinson, “Strongly regular generalized equations,”Mathematics of Operations Research 5 (1980) 43–62.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. S.M. Robinson, “Generalized equations,” in A. Bachem, M. Grotschel and B. Korte, eds.,Mathematical Programming: The State of the Art (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983) pp. 346–367.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.T. Rockafellar, “Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm,”SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 14 (1976) 877–898.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. U. Tulowitzki, “Inexact successive linearization methods for variational inequality problems,” SOM Working Paper, School of Organization and Management, Yale University (New Haven, Connecticut, October 1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant ECS-8407240.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pang, JS. Inexact Newton methods for the nonlinear complementarity problem. Mathematical Programming 36, 54–71 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02591989

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02591989

Key words

Navigation