Skip to main content
Log in

Second order necessary and sufficient conditions for convex composite NDO

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

In convex composite NDO one studies the problem of minimizing functions of the formF:=hf whereh:ℝm → ℝ is a finite valued convex function andf:ℝn → ℝm is continuously differentiable. This problem model has a wide range of application in mathematical programming since many important problem classes can be cast within its framework, e.g. convex inclusions, minimax problems, and penalty methods for constrained optimization. In the present work we extend the second order theory developed by A.D. Ioffe in [11, 12, 13] for the case in whichh is sublinear, to arbitrary finite valued convex functionsh. Moreover, a discussion of the second order regularity conditions is given that illuminates their essentially geometric nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.H. Anderson and M.R. Osborne, “Discrete, nonlinear approximation problems in polyhedral norms,”Numerische Mathematik 28 (1977) 143–156.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. B.M. Bell,Nonsmooth optimization by successive quadratic programming (Dissertation, Department of Mathematics, University of Washington, USA, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Ben-Tal and J. Zowe, “Necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for a class of nonsmooth minimization problems,”Mathematical Programming 24 (1982) 70–91.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. J.V. Burke and S.-P. Han, “A Gauss-Newton approach to solving generalized inequalities,”Mathematics of Operations Research 11 (1986) 632–643.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. J.V. Burke, “Descent methods for composite nondifferentiable optimization problems,”Mathematical Programming 33 (1985) 260–279.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. R.W. Chaney, “Second order necessary conditions in semi-smooth optimization,” Preprint, Dept. of Math., Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.W. Chaney, “Second order sufficient conditions in nonsmooth optimization,” Preprint, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. F.H. Clarke,Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis (Canadian Mathematical Society Series of Monographs and Advanced Texts, John Wiley and Sons, 1983).

  9. R. Fletcher,Practical Methods for Optimization, Vol. II. Constrained Optimization (Wiley, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Fletcher, “A model algorithm for composite nondifferentiable optimization problems,”Mathematical Programming Study 17 (1982) 67–76.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. A.D. Ioffe, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for a local minimum. 1: A reduction theorem and first order conditions,”SIAM Journal Control and Optimization 17 (1979) 245–250.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. A.D. Ioffe, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for a local minimum, 2: Conditions of Levitin-Miljutin-Osmolovskii Type,”SIAM Journal Control and Optimization 17 (1979) 251–265.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A.D. Ioffe, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for a local minimum. 3: Second order conditions and augmented duality,”SIAM Journal Control and Optimization 17 (1979) 266–288.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Madsen,Minimization of Nonlinear Approximation Functions (Dissertation, Institute for Numerical Analysis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.R. Osborne, “Algorithms for nonlinear approximation,” in: C.T.H. Baker and C. Phillips, eds.,The Numerical Solution of Nonlinear Problems (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1981) pp. 270–286.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.J.D. Powell, “General algorithms for discrete nonlinear approximation calculation,” in: C.K. Chui, L.L. Schumaker, and J.D. Ward, eds.,Approximation Theory IV, Academic Press, NY (1983) 187–218.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M.J.D. Powell, “On the global convergence of trust-region algorithms for unconstrained minimization,”Mathematical Programming 29 (1984) 297–303.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. R.T. Rockafellar, “Marginal values and second-order necessary conditions for optimality,”Mathematical Programming 26 (1983) 245–286.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. R.T. Rockafellar,Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, 1970).

  20. R.S. Womersley, “Optimality conditions for piecewise smooth functions,” Mathematical Programming Study 17 (1982) 13–27.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. R.S. Womersley, “Local properties of algorithms for minimizing nonsmooth composite functions,”Mathematical Programming 32 (1985) 69–89.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Yuan, “Global convergence of trust region algorithms for nonsmooth optimization,” Report DAMTP (1983), Cambridge University, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Yuan, “Some properties of trust-region algorithms for non-smooth optimization,” Report DAMTP (1983), Cambridge University, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burke, J.V. Second order necessary and sufficient conditions for convex composite NDO. Mathematical Programming 38, 287–302 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02592016

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02592016

Key words

Navigation