Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of friction under sheet forming conditions

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among the tests used to evaluate friction in sheet forming processes, bending-under-tension (BUT) tests have received considerable attention. A new test was developed incorporating a smooth increase of wrap angle during deformation, even at high deformation rates, thus replicating typical conditions at die radii. A corresponding data analysis procedure was introduced to separate the effects of bending and friction and to account for the strain-rate sensitivity of the test material. The new test and analytical procedure were used to investigate the frictional behavior for four sheet alloys: interstitialfree (IF) steel, high-strength galvanized (HSG) steel, 2008-T4 aluminum, and 70/30 brass. A range of testing rates, pin radii, and lubrication conditions were employed, and the variation of friction coefficient (μ) as a function of contact radius, contact angle, and punch speed was measured. Complex variations ofμ with respect to tool radius and wrap angle were observed, consistent with previous studies. No significant, systematic variation ofμ was found for punch speeds ranging from 1.7 to 170 mm/s, contrary to reports in the literature. Failures in 2008-T4 aluminum shifted from tensile localization to bending as the tool radius was reduced. The other materials consistently failed by tensile localization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Reissner:Proc. 13th IDDRG, 1984, pp. 456–66.

  2. J. Reissner and W. Schmid:Proc. 14th IDDRG, 1986, pp. 329–40.

  3. C.Y. Sa: SAE Technical Paper No. 890346, SAE, Warrendale, PA, 1989.

  4. D.A. Burford, K. Narasimhan, and R.H. Wagoner:Metall. Trans. A, 1991, vol. 22A, pp. 1775–88.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.P. Maisch, B. Meier, and J. Reissner: inNumerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes, J.L. Chenot, R.D. Wood, and O.C. Zienkiewicz, eds., A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1992, pp. 163–68.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.R. Knibloe and R.H. Wagoner:Metall. Trans. A, 1989, vol. 20A, pp. 1509–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Bochmann and E. Doege: inNumerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes, J.L. Chenot, R.D. Wood, and O.C. Zienkiewicz, eds., A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1992, pp. 415–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.J. Saran and R.H. Wagoner:J. Appl. Mech., 1991, vol. 113, pp. 499–512.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.H. Wagoner, S. Latreille, J.L. Siles, and Y.H. Kim:Metall. Trans. A, 1991, vol. 22A, pp. 3003–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. B.B. Yoon, R.S. Rao, and N. Kikuchi:Trans. NAMRC, 1988, pp. 159–63.

  11. M.L. Wenner:J. Appl. Metalworking, 1983, vol. 2, pp. 277–87.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N.M. Wang:J. Appl. Metalworking, 1982, vol. 2, pp. 193–99.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H.D. Nine:J. Appl. Metalworking, 1982, vol. 2, pp. 200–10.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H.D. Nine: inMechanics of Sheet Metal Forming—Materials Behavior and Deformation Analysis, D.P. Koistinen and N.M. Wang, eds., Plenum, New York, NY, 1978, pp. 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B.S. Levy:J. Appl. Metalworking, 1983, vol. 3, pp. 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T.B. Stoughton:Proc. 15th IDDRG, 1988, pp. 205–15.

  17. W.F. Hosford and R.M. Caddell:Metal Forming: Mechanics and Metallurgy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983, p. 276.

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Orowan:Proc. Int. Mech. Eng., 1991, vol. 150, pp. 140–67.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M.C. Shaw, A. Ber, and P.A. Mamen:J. Basic Eng., 1960, vol. 82, pp. 342–59.

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. Wanhein and N. Bay:CIRP, 1976, vol. 27, pp. 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Avitzur:Int. Symp. Math. Modelling Hot Rolling Steel, ed. S. Yue, Can. Inst. Min. Metall., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 1990, pp. 300–27.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D.A. Korzekwa, P.R. Dawson, and W.R.D. Wilson:Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1992, vol. 34, pp. 521–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. B. Avitzur, C.K. Huang and Y.D. Zhu:Wear, 1984, vol. 95, pp. 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B. Avitzur and Y.D. Zhu:Trans. NAMRC, 1985, pp. 103–09.

  25. W.R.D. Wilson, H. Malkani, and P. Saha:Trans. NAMRC, 1991, pp. 37–42.

  26. J.A. Schey:Tribology in Metal Working, ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1983, p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  27. X.J. Wang, D.F. Jonason, and J.L. Duncan:Proc. 14th IDDRG, 1986, pp. 201–17.

  28. W.J. Wojtowicz:Lubrication Eng., 1955, May–June, pp. 174–77.

  29. M. Ejima, Y. Tokunaga, and T. Honda:Proc. 13th IDDRG, 1982, pp. 317–28.

  30. A.K. Ghosh:Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1977, vol. 19, pp. 457–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. H.D. Nine: inNovel Techniques in Metal Deformation Testing, R.H. Wagoner, ed., AIME, New York, NY, 1983, pp. 31–64.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Littlewood and J.F. Wallace:Sheet Metal Ind., 1964, Dec., pp. 925–30.

  33. J.L. Duncan, B.S. Shabel, and J.G. Filho: SAE Technical Paper No. 780391, SAE, Warrendale, PA 1978, p. 8.

  34. X.J. Wang, J.L. Duncan, and M.L. Devenpeck:J. Appl. Metalworking, 1983, vol. 3, pp. 3–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. C.H. Lee, H.B. Shim, and D.Y. Yang:Proc. 6th Int. Congr. Exp. Mech., 1988, pp. 71–76.

  36. R.J.J.M. Sniekers and J.A.H. Ramaekers:Proc. 4th ICTP, 1993, pp. 1717–21.

  37. G.J. Wenzloff, T.A. Hylton, and D.K. Matlock:J. Mater. Eng. Perf., 1992, vol. 1, pp. 609–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. W. Wang: Ph.D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  39. A. Higdon and W.B. Stiles:Engineering Mechanics, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall Inc., New York, NY, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  40. R. Zheng and D. Overby:Proc. 15th IDDRG, 1988, pp. 85–90.

  41. S.R. Bhonsle and K.J. Weinmann:Trans. NAMRI, 1990, pp. 46–51.

  42. H.H. Hollomon:Trans. AIME, 1945, vol. 162, pp. 268–290.

    Google Scholar 

  43. H.W. Swift:J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1952, vol. 1, pp. 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. E. Voce:J. Inst. Met., 1948, vol. 74, pp. 537–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. P. Ludwik:Elem. Technol. Mech., Julius Spring, Berlin, 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  46. M.S. Caceci and W.P. Cacheris:Byte, 1984, May, pp. 340–42.

  47. B.T. Meier and J. Reissner:Proc. 16th IDDRG, 1990, pp. 43–52.

  48. M. Sulonen, P. Eskola, J. Kumpulainen, and A. Ranta-Eskola:IDDRG WG Meeting, Tokyo, 1981.

  49. E. Schedin, K. Fredriksson, and C. Gustafsson:Proc. 15th IDDRG, 1988, pp. 55–61.

  50. Z. Deng, X.J. Wang, and J.N. Cai:Proc. 4th ICTP, 1993, pp. 1788–92.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, W., Wagoner, R.H. & Wang, X.J. Measurement of friction under sheet forming conditions. Metall Mater Trans A 27, 3971–3981 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02595646

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02595646

Keywords

Navigation