Skip to main content
Log in

A decision support system model for technology transfer

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Technology transfer is the process by which technology originating at one institutional setting is adapted for use in another. A major impediment to the implementation of new technologies to assist with mangerial decision-making problems is a lack of communication between the technology and management communities. Development of a tool designed to bridge the technology transfer gap was the goal of this research. The result is a prototype software package which may be used on an interactive computer terminal by a manager for assistance in designing a decision support system (DSS). The four primary research tasks were:

  1. 1.

    Develop a conceptual model of the DSS design process.

  2. 2.

    Select and adapt, or create, appropriate software to mechanize the model.

  3. 3.

    Develop a knowledge base to describe the interactiveness of various organization variables and managerial decision-making needs.

  4. 4.

    Collect and analyze interview data and implement resultant production rules on the model.

Tasks 1 and 2 were accomplished first to establish the feasibility of this effort. An interview instrument was developed for Task 3. And, corporate managers from several firms were interviewed to accomplish Task 4. Using this data, a prototype production rule model (called DECAIDS for DECISION AIDS) was constructed which supports managerial decision-making from the EMYCIN production rule system used at Stanford University.

The purpose of this article is to introduce the need for a Decision Support System Model. A complete copy of this research can be obtained through University Microfilms International, 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106, from the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California 93940, or the Defense Technical Information Center, Cameron Station, Alexandria, Virginia 22314. The title is “An Interactive Decision Support System for Technology Transfer Pertaining to Organization and Management”, 1980.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barclay, S., R.V. Brown, C.W. Kelly, III, C.R.Patterson, L.D.Phillips and J.Selvide,Handbook for Decision Analysis, Decisions and Designs, Inc., 1977.

  • Bragaw, L.K., Jr. “Some Characteristics of Successful Technological Innovations and Their Patterns”, D.B.A. dissertation, Washington, D.C.: George Washington Univ. 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, J.G., Jr. and F.R. Strator,Information Systems, Hamilton, 1974.

  • Churchman, C.W.,The Systems Approach, Delta, 1968.

  • Cleland D.I. and W.R. King,Systems Analysis and Project Management, McGraw-Hill, 1975, p. 146.

  • Creighton, J.W., J.A.Jolly and S.A.Denning,Enhancement of Research and Development Output Utilization Efficiencies; Linker Concept Methodology in the Technology Transfer Process, Naval Postgraduate School, June 1972.

  • Davis, G.B.,Management Information Systems, McGraw-Hill, 1974.

  • Dearden, J., “MIS is a Mirage”,Harvard Business Review, January–February, 1972, pp. 90–99.

  • Doctors, S.I.,The Role of Federal Agencies in Technology Transfer, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1969, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, E., Chairman of Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Presentation at the Naval Postgraduate School, October 1978.

  • Hart, P.E.,Artificial Intelligence and National Security — Some Opportunities, Stanford Research Institute, March 1978, pp. 2–5.

  • Kast, F.E. and J.E.Rosenzweig,Organization and Management: A Systems Approach, McGraw-Hill, 1974.

  • Katz, D. and R.L.Kahn,The Social Psychology of Organizations, Wiley, 1966.

  • Keen, P.G. and M.S. Scott-Morton,Decision Support Systems, Addison-Wesley, 1978.

  • Kimball, C., President of Midwest Research Institute, “Statement for Hearings before the Subcommittee on Science and Technology of the Select Committee on Small Business”, 90th Congress 1st Session (September–October 1967), p. 42.

  • Kruzic, P.,Introduction to the OPINT Software Package, Decisions and Designs, Inc., Virginia, February 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J.D.C., “Brandaid”,Operations Research, 4:23, May 1975, pp. 628–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorsch, J.W. and J.J.Morse,Organizations and Their Members: A Contingency Approach, Harper and Row, 1974.

  • Lucas, H.C., Jr.Information Systems Concepts for Management, McGraw-Hill, 1978.

  • Luthans, H.C., Jr.Information Systems Concepts for Management, McGraw-Hill, 1976.

  • Meador, C.L. and D.N. Ness, “Decision Support Systems: An Application to Corporate Planning”,Sloan Management Review, 15:2, Winter 1975, pp. 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modrick, J.A., “Decision Support in a Battlefield Environment”,Proceedings of the Workshop on Decision Information for Tactical Command and Control, (Thrall, R.M., ed.), Houston, Texas, pp. 260–276.

  • Newell, A. and H.A.Simon,Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, 1972.

  • Nolan, R., “Thoughts About the Fifth Estate”,Data Base, Fall 1975.

  • Post, E.L., “Formal Reductions of the General Combinatorial Decision Problem”, AmericanJournal of Mathematics, Vol. 65, 1943, pp. 197–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, J.L.,Production Systems: Planning, Analysis, and Control, Wiley and Sons, 1970.

  • Shetty, Y.K. and H.M. Carlisle, “A Contingency Model of Organization Design”, in Wortman and Luthans (eds.)Emerging Concepts in Management, Macmillan, 1975.

  • Shortliffe, E.H.,Computer-Based Consultation: MYCIN, American-Elseview, 1976.

  • Simon, H.A.,The Shape of Automation for Men and Management, Harper and Row, 1965.

  • Sinaiko, H.W.,Operational Decision Aids: A Program of Applied Research for Naval Command Control Systems, Manpower Research and Advisory Services, Smithsonian Institute, Washington, D.C., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, B.I., R.E. Hayes and J.J. Crain,The Impact of Computer-Based Decision Aids on Organization Structure in the Task Force Staff, CACI, Inc., Arlington, Virginia, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J.D.,Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hill, 1967.

  • U.S. Congress,Joint Economic Committee, Technology, Economic Growth and International Competitiveness, Robert Gilpin, Joint Committee Print, Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, W., “View from the Top”, Interview with Dr. Ruth M. Davis, Deputy Under-Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (Research and Advanced Technology)Military Electronics/Countermeasures, September 1979, pp. 25–32.

  • Waterman, D.A.,An Introduction to Production Systems, The RAND Corporation, Report P-5751, November 1976.

  • Waterman, D.A. and F. Hayes-Roth, “An Overview of Pattern-Directed Inference Systems”,Pattern Directed Inference Systems, D.A. Waterman and F. Hayes-Roth (eds.), Academic Press, 1978.

  • Williams, L.R.,Modern Approaches to Decision-Making, U.S. Army War College Military Studies Program Paper, Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania, May 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, P.H.,Artificial Intelligence, Addison-Wesley, 1979, 2nd Printing.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The organization specializes in management consulting and technology transfer engineering.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roland, R.J. A decision support system model for technology transfer. J Technol Transfer 7, 73–93 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02620350

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02620350

Keywords

Navigation