Abstract
Three commercial heats of Alloy 800 have been tested at 838 K in simple tension and in fatigue at constant plastic strain ranges from 0.2 pct. to 1.4 pct. Although all three heats met the ASTM specifications for Alloy 800, the heats exhibited significant differences in elevated temperature mechanical properties. These differences were functions not only of heat-to-heat chemistry variations, but also of the final annealing treatment given during their manufacture. The microstructures of several samples cycled to failure in the above tests were examined by transmission electron microscopy and compared with the microstructures of the as-received heats. It was found that significant additional precipitation occurred during the fatigue testing of two of the heats, and this was correlated with secondary hardening behavior found during the mechanical tests. The observed precipitation behavior could be explained using suggested isothermal transformation curves and solvus curves taken from the literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. A. Cordovi:Alloy 800, W. Betteridge, R. Krefeld, H. Krockel, S. L. Lloyd, M. Van de Voorde, and C. Vivante, eds., North-Holland Publishing, New York, NY, 1978, p. 3.
Alloy 800, W. Betteridge,et al, eds., North-Holland Publishing, New York, NY, 1978.
J. B. Conway, J. T. Berling, and R. H. Stentz:Metall. Trans., 1972, vol. 3, p. 1633.
J. L. Kaae and R. E. Villagrana:Alloy 800, W. Betteridge,et al, eds., North-Holland Publishing, New York, NY, 1978, p. 181.
H. Nahm and J. Moteff:Metall. Trans. A, 1976, vol. 7A, p. 1473.
J. Orr:Alloy 800, W. Betteridge,et al, eds., North-Holland Publishing, New York, NY, 1978, p. 25.
J.L. Kaae and T,D. Gulden:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1969, vol. 245, p. 1832.
U.E. Wolff:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1966, vol. 236, p. 19.
D. H. Jack and K. H. Jack:Mat. Sci. Eng., 1973, vol. 11, p. 1.
1979 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, part 8, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA.
J. B. Conway, R. H. Stentz, and J. T. Beding: “Fatigue, Tensile, and Relaxation Behavior of Stainless Steels,” AEC Report TID-26135, 1975.
W. J. Plumbridge, M. E. Dalski, and P. J. Castle:Fatigue of Engineering Materials and Structures, 1980, vol. 3, p. 177.
R.E. Stoltz and A.G. Pineau:Math. Sci. Engr., 1978, vol. 34, p. 275.
A.H. Nahm and J. Moteff:Metall. Trans. A, 1981, vol. 12A,p. 1011.
L. M. Brown and R. K. Ham:Strengthening Methods in Crystals, A. Kelly and R. B. Nicholson, eds., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1971,p. 12.
P. G. Stone, J. Orr, and J. C. Guest:A Status Review of Alloy 800, S. F. Pugh, ed., BNES, London, 1975, p. 15.
Incoloy Alloys 800, 800 H and 801, Huntington Alloys, Inc., Huntington, WV, 1978.
T. H. Bassford and D. W. Rahoi:Alloy 800, W. Betteridge,et al, eds., North-Holland Publishing, New York, NY, 1978, p. 151.
A. P. L. Turner:Metall. Trans. A, 1979, vol. 10A, p. 225.
H. Nahm, J. Moteff, and D. R. Diercks:Acta Metall., 1977, vol. 25, p. 107.
A.A. Tavassoli and G. Colombe:Metall. Trans. A, 1978, vol. 9A, p. 1203.
A. Plumtree and N-G. Persson:Metall. Trans. A, 1976, vol. 7A, p. 1743.
Ph. Berge, J.R. Donati, D. Guttmann, P. Spiteri, and L. Valibus:Revue de Metallurgie, 1975, vol. 72, p. 837.
F. E. Asbury and G. Willoughby:A Status Review of Alloy 800, S. F. Pugh, ed., BNES, London, 1975, p. 242.
R. Lagneburg:J. Iron and Steel Inst., 1969, vol. 207, p. 1503.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, W.B., Allen, R.M. Mechanical Behavior of Alloy 800 at 838 K. Metall Trans A 13, 637–648 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02644429
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02644429