Skip to main content
Log in

The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language

  • Part I Predicting, Preventing, And Remediating Reading Failures
  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reading research supports the necessity for directly teaching concepts about linguistic structure to beginning readers and to students with reading and spelling difficulties. In this study, experienced teachers of reading, language arts, and special education were tested to determine if they have the requisite awareness of language elements (e.g., phonemes, morphemes) and of how these elements are represented in writing (e.g., knowledge of sound-symbol correspondences). The results were surprisingly poor, indicating that even motivated and experienced teachers typically understand too little about spoken and written language structure to be able to provide sufficient instruction in these areas. The utility of language structure knowledge for instructional planning, for assessment of student progress, and for remediation of literacy problems is discussed.

The teachers participating in the study subsequently took a course focusing on phonemic awareness training, spoken-written language relationships, and careful analysis of spelling and reading behavior in children. At the end of the course, the teachers judged this information to be essential for teaching and advised that it become a prerequisite for certification. Recommendations for requirements and content of teacher education programs are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. J. 1990.Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning About Print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, M. J., and Bruck, M. 1993. Word recognition: The interface of educational policies and scientific research.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5:113–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Heibert, E. H., Scott, J. A., and Wilkinson, I. A. G. 1985.Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading. Washington, D.C.: The National Institute of Education, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, A., and Blachman, B. 1991. Does phoneme segmentation training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling?Reading Research Quarterly 26:49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, B. 1993. Teacher retention and attrition in special and general education: A critical review of the literature.Journal of Special Education 27:137–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J. A., and Francis, J. 1991. Phonological analysis as a function of age and exposure to reading instruction.Applied Psycholinguistics 12:91–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S. 1986. Short-term memory, phonological processing and reading ability.Annals of Dyslexia 36:138–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P. E., and Bradley, L. 1983. Psychological strategies and the development of reading and writing.In M. Martlew (ed.).The Psychology of Written Langauge: Developmental and Educational Perspectives. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, R. C. 1991. Decoding and spelling: What to teach? When to teach? How to teach it?Psychological Science 2:83–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H. W. 1989. Speech production deficits in developmental dyslexia.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 54:422–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. 1989. Learning to read: The great debate 20 years later: A response to “Debunking the great phonics myth.”Phi Delta Kappan 70:521–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranston-Gringas, A., and Mauser, A. J. 1992. Categorical and noncategorical teacher certification in special education: How wide is the gap?Remedial and Special Education 13(4):6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C., Olson, R. K., Pennington, B. F., and Smith, S. D. 1991. The Colorado Reading Project: An update. In D. D. Duane and D. B. Gray (eds.).The Reading Brain: The Biological Basis of Dyslexia. Parkton, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. 1984. How orthography alters spoken language competencies in children learning to read and spell.In J. Downing and R. Valtin (eds.).Language Awareness and Learning to Read. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. 1993. Development of the ability to read words: Update.In R. Ruddell, M. Ruddell, and H. Singer (eds.).Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., and Robbins, C. 1992. Beginners need some decoding skill to read by analogy.Reading Research Quarterly 27:13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C., Wilce, L. S., and Taylor, B. B. 1987. Children’s categorization of short vowels in words and the influence of spellings.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 33(3):393–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felton, R. H. 1993. Effects of instruction on the decoding skills of children with phonological-processing problems.Journal of Learning Disabilities 26:583–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felton, R. H., and Wood, F. B. 1989. Cognitive deficits in reading disability and attention deficit disorder.Journal of Learning Disabilities 22:3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, V., and Rodman, R. 1993.An Introduction to Language. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Janovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskins, F. W., Downer, M. A., Anderson, R. C., Cunningham, P. M, Gaskins, R. W., Schommer, M., and The Teachers of the Benchmark School. 1988. A metacognitive approach to phonics: Using what you know to decode what you don’t know.Remedial and Special Education 9:36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. 1992. Annotation: Phonological factors in spelling development.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 33:967–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., and Bryant, P. 1990.Phonological Skills and Learning to Read. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., Ehri, L. C., and Treiman, R., eds. 1992.Reading Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M. 1993. Morphological structure: Latin and Greek roots and affixes as upper grade code strategies.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5:227–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, M. 1985.Phonics For the Teacher of Reading. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Reading Association, Committee on Professional Standards and Ethics 1978. Guidelines for professional preparation of reading teachers.The Reading Teacher 32:48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C. 1988. Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades.Journal of Educational Psychology 80:437–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavale, K. A., and Forness, S. R. 1985.The Science of Learning Disabilities. San Diego: College Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavale, K. A., and Reese, J. H. 1991. Teacher beliefs and perceptions about learning disabiliites: A survey of Iowa practioners.Learning Disability Quarterly 14:141–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y., and Liberman, A. M. 1990. Whole language vs. code emphasis: Underlying assumptions and their implications for reading instruction.Annals of Dyslexia 40:51–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y., and Shankweiler, D. 1985. Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write.Remedial and Special Education 6:8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindamood, P. 1993. Issues in researching the link between phonological awareness, learning disabilities, and spelling.In G. R. Lyon (ed.).Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities: New Views on Measurement Issues. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R., Vaasen, M., and Toomey, F. 1989. Teachers’ perceptions of their undergraduate and graduate preparation.Teacher Education and Special Education 12:164–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, D. 1987. Does categorical teacher certification benefit the mildly handicapped child?Exceptional Children 53:423–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, N. 1992. Whole language reading instruction for students with learning disabilities: Caught in the cross fire.Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 7:87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. 1993. Spelling error analysis: Beyond the phonetic/dysphonetic dichotomy.Annals of Dyslexia 43:174–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. in press. Phonological spelling errors in the writing of dyslexic adolescents.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.

  • Moats, L. C., and Smith, C. 1992. Derivational morphology: Why it should be included in language assessment and instruction.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 23:312–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolen, P. A., McCutchen, D., and Berninger, V. 1990. Ensuring tomorrow’s literacy: A shared responsibility.Journal of Teacher Education 41:63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., and Olson, R. K. 1992. The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review.Reading Research Quarterly 27:29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, C. 1986.Children’s Creative Spelling. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M. C., Wang, M. C., and Walberg, H. J. 1992. The knowledge bases for special and general education.Remedial and Special Education 13(5):6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soodak, L. C., and Podell, D. M. 1993. Teacher efficacy and student problem as factors in special education referral.Journal of Special Education 27:66–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. 1991. Cognitive science meets beginning reading.Psychological Science 2:70, 77–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, J. 1985.Syllable Plus. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. 1992. The role of intra-syllabic units in learning to read and spell.In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, and R. Treiman (eds.).Reading Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. 1993.Beginning to Spell. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., and Baron, J. 1983. Phonemic-analysis training helps children benefit from spelling-sound rules.Memory and Cognition 11:382–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunmer, W. E., and Hoover, W. A. 1993. Phonological recoding skill and beginning reading.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5:161–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunmer, W. E., and Nesdale, A. R. 1985. Phonemic segmentation skill and beginning reading.Journal of Educational Psychology 77:417–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R. 1991a. Has basic research in reading increased our understanding of development of reading and how to teach reading?Psychological Science 2:70, 81–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R. 1991b. Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition: Convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology 83:437–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., and Scanlon, D. 1987. Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 33:321–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. 1987. Educational treatments for dyslexia at the elementary and secondary levels.In R. Bowler (ed.).Intimacy with Language: A Forgotten Basic in Teacher Education. Baltimore:The Orton Dyslexia Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., Bally, H., and Morris, R. 1986. Automaticity, retrieval processes, and reading: A longitudinal study in average and impaired readers.Child Development 57:988–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yopp, H. K. 1992. Developing phoneme awareness in young children.The Reading Teacher 45:696–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigmond, N. 1993. Learning disabilities from an educational perspective.In G. R. Lyon, D. B. Gray, J. Kavanagh, and N. Krasnegor (eds.).Better Understanding Learning Disabilities: New Views From Research and their Implications for Education and Public Policy. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moats, L.C. The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia 44, 81–102 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648156

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648156

Keywords

Navigation