Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of plane-strain and tensile work hardening in two sheet steel alloys

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extended tensile tests and newly-devised plane-strain tests have been performed on two commercial sheet steels: an aluminum-killed (A-K) steel and a cold-rolled, dual-phase (D-P) steel. Up to uniform strain in uniaxial tension, the average work-hardening rate of both steels was found to be independent of strain state (isotropic hardening). The planestrain behavior of both steels was in good agreement with predictions of Hill’s old theory of normal anisotropic plasticity. At larger strains, the work-hardening rate in tension is greater than in plane strain. All of the tests were adjusted to reflect constant strain rates and all results were well represented by work hardening of the Hollomon type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. A. Ayres, W. G. Brazier, and V. F. Sajewski:J. Appl. Metalwork., 1979, vol. 1, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. H. Wagoner:Metall. Trans. A, 1980, vol. 11A, p. 165.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. L. R. Jackson, K. F. Smith, and W. T. Lankford: Met. Tech., 1948, technical publication no. 2440 andJ. Met., and J. Met., 1949, vol. 1, p. 524.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Hill:Proc. R. Soc., 1949, vol. 198, p. 428.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Hill:The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity, p. 315, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. E. Dorn:J. Appl. Phys., 1949, vol. 20, p. 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. von Mises:Göttinger Nachrichten, Math.-Phys. Klasse, p. 582, 1913.

  8. P. B. Mellor and A. Parmer:Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming, p. 53, D. P. Koistinen and N. M. Wang, eds., Plenum, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Parmer and P. B. Mellor:Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1978, vol. 20, p. 385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Parmer and P. B. Mellor:Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1978, vol. 20, p. 707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Hill:Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc, 1979, vol. 85, p. 179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Yoshida, K. Yoshii, H. Komorida, M. Usuda, and H. Watanabe:Sheet Met. Ind., 1971, vol. 48, p. 772 ; K. Yoshida: Reports I.P.C.R., 1969, vol. 45, p. 157; K. Yoshida, K. Abe, and T. Machida: Reports I.P.C.R., 1969, vol. 45, p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Pearce:Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1968, vol. 10, p. 995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. I. Yousif, J. L. Duncan, and W. Johnson:Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1970, vol. 12, p. 959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. M. S. B. Horta, W. T. Roberts, and D. V. Wilson:Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1970, vol. 12, p. 231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. N. Bramley and P. B. Mellor:Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1966, vol. 8 p. 101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H. J. Kleemola and A. J. Ranta-Eskola:Metall. Trans. A, 1976, vol. 7A, p. 595.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Taghvaipour and P. B. Mellor:Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 1970–71, vol. 185, p. 593.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. J. Ranta-Eskola:Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1979, vol. 21, p. 457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. H. Wagoner and N. M. Wang:Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1979, vol. 21, p. 255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D. J. Bailey: U.S. Patent No. 3930907, 6 Jan. 1976.

  22. D. J. Bailey: S.A.E. Preprint No. 760715, October 18–22, 1976.

  23. M. S. Rashid:SA.E. Trans., 1976, vol. 85, p. 938.

    Google Scholar 

  24. s. Hayami and T. Furukawa:Proc. Micralloying ’75, p. 311, Union Carbide, N.Y., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. T. Davenport: ed.Formable HSLA and Dual Phase Steels, AIME, N.Y., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. A. Kot and J. W. Morris: eds.,Structure and Properties of Dual-Phase Steels, AIME, N.Y. 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Inland Steel Company, East Chicago, Indiana.

  28. T. E. Fine, R. V. Fostini, B. S. Levy, A. G. Preban, and R. Stevenson: S. A. E. Preprint No. 780136, Feb. 27–Mar. 3, 1978.

  29. W. G. Brazier and R. Stevenson: SAE Preprint No. 780137, Feb. 27–Mar. 3, 1978.

  30. R. H. Wagoner:Metall. Trans. A, 1981, vol. 12A, p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. H. Hollomon:Trans. AIME, 1945, vol. 162, p. 268.

    Google Scholar 

  32. O. Hoffman and G. Sachs:Introduction to the Theory of Plasticity for Engineers, p. 45, McGraw-Hill, N.Y. 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  33. H. W. Swift,J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1952, vol. 1, p. 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. W. Johnson and P. B. Mellor:Plasticity for Mechanical Engineers, p.15. Van Nostrand, N.Y., 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  35. E. Voce:J. Inst. Met., 1948, vol. 74, pp. 537, 562, 760.

    Google Scholar 

  36. E. Voce:Engineer, 1955, vol. 195, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  37. E. Voce:Metallurgia, 1953, vol. 51, p. 219.

    Google Scholar 

  38. C. deBoor and J. R. Rice:Cubic Spline Approximation I-Fixed Knots, Comp. Sci. Dept. TR20, Purdue University, April 1968.

  39. B. St. Venant:Mem. Savants Etrangers, 1855, vol. 14, quoted by: J. P. Hirth and J. Lothe:Theory of Dislocations, p. 56, McGraw-Hill, N.Y., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagoner, R.H. Comparison of plane-strain and tensile work hardening in two sheet steel alloys. Metall Trans A 12, 877–882 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648352

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648352

Keywords

Navigation