Abstract
A critical appraisal of theory and experiments for both isothermal and forced velocity pearlite is presented. It is concluded for binary systems that both the theoretical models for volume diffusion and boundary diffusion control are well-advanced and adequate for the purposes of experimental test. However, some ambiguity remains in the boundary diffusion model with respect to the thermodynamics of the boundary ”phase” region, so it is still not possible to predict absolute rates of transformation. The theoretical problem for ternary pearlites is also well understood, although rigorous theory seems intractable. A new perturbation procedure for definition of the optimal steady-state spacing is presented and amplified for both isothermal and forced velocity pearlite, and for both volume and boundary diffusion models. In terms of the critical spacing Sc for isothermal pearlite and the spacing at minimum undercooling Sm for forced velocity pearlite the predicted stability points are as follows: {fx2777-1} For isothermal pearlite these perturbation results correspond closely to the state of maximum entropy production rate while for forced velocity pearlite the correspondence is also satisfactory. A detailed analysis of the data leads us to reaffirm the author’s conclusions that the eutectoid reactions in Cu-12 pct Al and some related ternary alloys reported by Asundi and West are controlled by volume diffusion and that the eutectoid reaction in Al-78 Zn reported by Cheetham and Ridley is controlled by boundary diffusion. We conclude further after careful analysis that the pearlite reaction in Fe-0.8 C is controlled for the higher temperatures by volume diffusion of carbon in austenite. We are also led to state that the pearlite transformations in Fe-C-Mn and Fe-C-Ni occur for the most part in a nopartition regime and are therefore controlled by volume diffusion of carbon in austenite, while the transformations in Fe-C-Cr and Fe-C-Mo, being forced by thermodynamics to sustain partition of chromium and molybdenum, are controlled by phase boundary diffusion of the latter elements. nt]mis|M. P. PULS, formerly Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Metallurgy and Materials Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. F. Boiling and R. H. Richman:Met. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, p.2095.
Decomposition of Austenite by Diffusional Processes, V. F. Zackay and H. I. Aaronson, eds., Interscience Publishers, 1962.
W. H. Brandt:J Appl. Phys., 1945, vol. 16, p. 139.
E. Scheil:Z. Metallk., 1946, vol. 37, p. 123.
C. Zener:AIME Trans., 1946, vol. 167, p. 550.
M. Hillert:Jernkont. Ann., 1957, vol. 141, p. 757.
W. A. Tiller:Liquid Metals and Solidification, p. 276, ASM, Cleveland, 1958.
K. A. Jackson and J.D. Hunt:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1966, vol. 236, p. 1129.
D. Turnbull:Acta Met., 1955, vol. 3, p. 55.
J. W. Cahn:Acta Met., 1959, vol. 7, p. 18.
C. S. Smith:Trans. ASM, 1953,vol. 45,p. 533.
J. M. Shapiro and J. S. Kirkaldy:Acta Met., 1968, vol. 16, p. 579.
M. Hillert: Monograph and Report Series no. 33, p. 231, Institute of Metals, 1969.
B. Sundquist:Acta Met., 1968, vol. 16, p. 1413.
M. Hillert:Met. Trans., 1972, vol. 3, p. 2729.
J. S. Kirkaldy and M. Mekawi: McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada, 1972, unpublished research.
L. F. Donaghey and W. A. Tiller:Mater. Sci. Eng., 1968-69, vol. 3, p. 231.
G. Bolze: Ph.D. Thesis, McMaster University, May 1970.
M. Hillert:Acta Met., 1971, vol. 19, p. 769.
G. Bolze, M. P. Puls, and J. S. Kirkaldy:Acta Met., 1972, vol. 20, p. 73.
B.Sundquist:Acta Met., 1969, vol. 17, p. 967.
J. S. Kirkaldy:Can. J. Phys., 1969, vol. 36, p. 907.
G. R. Purdy, D. Weichert, and J. S. Kirkaldy:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1964, vol. 230,p.1025.
A. A. Popov and M. S. Mikhalev:Phys. Metals Metattogr., 1959, vol. 7, p. 36.
H. I. Aaronson, H. A. Domian, and G. M. Pound:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1966, vol. 236, p. 768.
M. Hillert:Proc. of the Int. Conf. on the Science and Technology of Iron and Steel, Supplement to Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Japan, 1971, vol. 11, p. 1153.
K. A. Jackson and B. Chalmers: inPrinciples of Solidification, by B. Chalmers, p. 201, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1964.
J. S. Kirkaldy:Scripta Met., 1968, vol. 2, p. 565.
S. O’Hara and A. Hellawell:Scripta Met., 1968, vol. 2, p. 107.
F. C. Frank and K. E. Puttick:Acta Met., 1956, vol. 4, p. 206.
J. S. Kirkaldy: inEnergetics in Metallurgical Processes IV, W. M. Mueller, ed., p. 197, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1968. Note that the relations forS △T are in units of mm °C, not cm°C as indicated.
M. Hillert: unpublished review onThe Eutectoid Transformation ofAustenite.
W. A. Tiller: Cast Iron, ASM Seminar, Detroit, 1964.
J. S. Kirkaldy:Can. J. Phys., 1964, vol. 42, p. 1447.
L. Onsager:Phys. Rev., 1931, vol. 37, p. 405.
H.E.Cline:E.Cline: Acta Met, 1971, vol. 19, p. 481.
J. W. Cahn and W. C. Hagel: inDecomposition of Austenite by Diffusional Processes, V. F. Zackay and H. I. Aaronson, eds., p. 131, Interscience Pub-lishers, 1962.
D. Brown and N. Ridley:J. Iron Steel Inst., 1966, vol. 204, p. 811.
M. K. Asundi and D. R. F. West:J. Inst. Metals, 1966, vol. 94, p. 19.
G. E. Pellisier, M. F. Hawkes, W. A. Johnson, and R. F. Mehl:Trans. ASM, 1942, vol. 30, p. 1049.
M. Gensamer, E. B. Pearsall, W. S. Pellini, and J. R. Law:Trans. ASM, 1942, vol. 30, p. 983.
M. K. Asundi and D. R. F. West:J. Inst. Metals, 1966, vol. 94, p. 327.
D. Brown and N. Ridley:J. Iron Steel Inst., 1969, vol. 207, p. 1232.
M. Hillert: inDecomposition of Austenite by Diffusional Processes, V. F. Zackay and H. I. Aaronson, eds., p. 197, Interscience Publishers, 1962.
J. E. Hilliard: General Electric Report No. 62-RL-3133M, Oct. 1962.
E. Scheil and A. Lange-Weise:Arch. Eisenhüttenw., 1937, vol. 11, p. 93.
C. R. Brooks and E. E. Stansbury:J. Iron Steel Inst, 1965, vol. 203, p. 514.
F. M. A. Carpay:Acta Met., 1970, vol. 18, p. 747.
F. M. A. Carpay and J. Van den Boomgaard:Acta Met., 1971, vol. 19, p. 1279.
B. L. Bramfitt and A. R. Marder:Int. Met. Soc. Proc, 1968, p. 43.
D. Cheetham and N. Ridley:J. Inst. Metals, 1971, vol. 99, p. 371.
N. Ridley, D. Brown, and H. I. Malik: Manchester University, Manchester, England, 1971, unpublished research.
J. W. Cahn and W. C. Hagel:Acta Met., 1963, vol. 11, p. 561.
J. Fridberg and M. Hillert:Acta Met, 1970, vol. 18, p. 1253.
J. H. Frye Jr.,, E. E. Stansbury, and D. L. McElroy:AIME Trans., 1953, vol. 197, p.219.
F. C. Hull, R. A. Colton, and R. F. Mehl:AIME Trans., 1942, vol. 150, p. 185.
E. S. Wajda:Acta Met., 1954, vol. 2, p. 184.
J. J. Kramer, G. M. Pound, and R. F. Mehl:ActaMet., 1958, vol. 6, p. 763.
C. Wells, W. Batz, and R. F. Mehl:AIME Trans., 1950, vol. 188, p. 553.
R. Trivedi and G. M. Pound:J. Appl. Phys., 1967, vol. 38, p. 3569.
C. Wert:Phys. Rev., 1950, vol. 79, p. 601.
M. L. Plcklesimer, D. L. McElroy, T. M. Kegley, E. E. Stansbury, and J. H. Frye:AIME Trans., 1946, vol. 167, p. 550.
D. Chambers and J. S. Kirkaldy: McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada, 1972, unpublished research.
W. A. Tiller:J. Appl. Phys., 1963, vol. 34, p. 3615.
J. S. Kirkaldy: inEnergetics in Metallurgical Processes IV, W. M. Mueller, ed., p. 360, Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, 1968.
J. D. Hunt and J. P. Chilton:J. Inst. Metals, 1963, vol. 92, p. 21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is based on a presentation made at a symposium on “The Cellular and the Pearlite Reactions,” held at the Detroit Meeting of The Metallurgical Society of AIME, October 20, 1971, under the sponsorship of the IMD Heat Treatment Committee.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Puls, M.P., Kirkaldy, J.S. The pearlite reaction. Metall Trans 3, 2777–2796 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652844
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652844