Abstract
In this paper we report the first experimental results for double heterostructure (DH) Burrus LED’s in which current confinement is achieved by proton bombardment techniques. Both p-type and n-type active layers with carrier concentrations ranging from 1016 cm−3 to 2 × 1018 cm−3 were investigated. Devices with shallow surface bombardments (at 100 keV) were compared to devices with deep bombardments (at 390 keV), which penetrate past the p-n junction. Measurements were made of the shape of the light emitting area, device capacitance, 3 dB bandwidth, external efficiency, and operating reliability. These results have been compared with those obtained from LED’s fabricated from the same crystals with conventional oxide-masking techniques.
It has been found that deep proton bombardment provides precise control of the. light emitting area as well as the largest 3 dB bandwidths through reductions in the device capacitance. Comparisons of the output power for the various devices established that the overall device efficiency improved in going from deep to shallow bombardment conditions. However, in all cases, the highest efficiencies were achieved with conventional oxide confinement as a result of enhanced reflection at the SiO2-metal interface. These observations have led to the fabrication of an innovative LED structure which incorporates both oxide-masking for improved efficiency and proton bombardment for improved 3 dB bandwidth. Under operation at 100°C and junction current densities of approximately 3 kA/cm2, the reliability of LED’s with proton bombardment confinement was found to be equal to or better than LED’s with conventional oxide confinement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C.A. Burrus and B.I. Miller, Opt. Commun.4, 307 (1971).
C.A. Burrus, Proc. IEEE60, 231 (1972).
C.A. Burrus, T.P. Lee, and W.S. Holden, Proc. IEEE53, 329 (1975).
F.D. King, A.J. SpringThorpe and O.I. Szentesi, Technical Digest, 1975 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEEE, N.Y. 1975), p. 480.
A.W. Mabbitt and R.C. Goodfellow, Electronics Lett.11, 274 (1975).
R.C. Goodfellow and A.W. Mabbitt, Electronics Lett.22, 51 (1975).
J.C. Dyment, L.A. D’Asaro, J.C. North, B.I. Miller, and J.E. Ripper, Proc. IEEE60, 726 (1972).
R.L. Hartman, J.C. Dyment, C.J. Hwang, and M. Kuhn, Appl. Phys. Lett.23, 181 (1973).
R.L. Hartman and R.W. Dixon, Appl. Phys. Lett.26, 239 (1975).
B.I. Miller, E. Pinkas, I. Hayashi and R.J. Capik, J. Appl. Phys.43, 2817 (1972).
B.I. Miller and H.C. Casey, Jr., Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on GaAs and Related Compounds (1972). (British Inst. of Physics, Conf. Series 17, p. 231).
A.J. SpringThorpe, F.D. King and A. Becke, J. Electro- nic Mat1.4, 101 (1975).
This structure was originally proposed by O.I. Szentesi of our laboratory.
J.C. Dyment, J.C. North and L.A. D’Asaro, J. Appl. Phys.44, 207 (1973).
W. Harth, W. Huber and J. Heinen, IEEE Trans. Elec- tron Dev.ED-23, 478 (1976).
J.R. Biard, G.E. Pittman, and J.F. Leezer, Conference Series #3, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Gallium Arsenide, page 113 (1966). The British Inst. of Physics, London and Bristol, 1967.
E.S. Yand, J. Appl. Phys.45, 3801 (1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dyment, J.C., SpringThorpe, A.J., King, F.D. et al. Proton bombarded double heterostructure LED’s. J. Electron. Mater. 6, 173–193 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02660382
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02660382