Abstract
The influences of crack deflection on the growth rates ofnominally Mode I fatigue cracks are examined. Previous theoretical analyses of stress intensity solutions for kinked elastic cracks are reviewed. Simple elastic deflection models are developed to estimate the growth rates of nonlinear fatigue cracks subjected to various degrees of deflection, by incorporating changes in the effective driving force and in the apparent propagation rates. Experimental data are presented for intermediate-quenched and step-quenched conditions of Fe/2Si/0.1C ferrite-martensite dual phase steel, where variations in crack morphology alone influence considerably the fatigue crack propagation rates and threshold stress intensity range values. Such results are found to be in good quantitative agreement with the deflection model predictions of propagation rates for nonlinear cracks. Experimental information on crack deflection, induced by variable amplitude loading, is also provided for 2020-T651 aluminum alloy. It is demonstrated with the aid of elastic analyses and experiments that crack deflection models offer a physically-appealing rationale for the apparently slower growth rates of long fatigue cracks subjected to constant and variable amplitude loading and for the apparent deceleration and/or arrest of short cracks. The changes in the propagation rates of deflected fatigue cracks are discussed in terms of thelocal mode of crack advance, microstructure, effective driving force, growth mechanisms, mean stress, slip characteristics, and crack closure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- a :
-
length of the main cracks
- a ij :
-
angular functions
- b :
-
length of the first kink
- b 1 :
-
length of the fork
- b 1 :
-
length of the second kink
- c :
-
nominal length of a fatigue crack
- D :
-
length of the deflected segment
- dc/dN :
-
nominal crack growth rate
- dc/dN :
-
growth rate of a deflected crack
- k eff :
-
effective stress intensity factor for a deflected crack
- k 1 :
-
Mode I stress intensity factor for a deflected crack
- k 1 :
-
Mode I stress intensity factor for an inclined crack
- K 1 :
-
Mode I stress intensity factor for a linear crack
- jc 2 :
-
Mode II stress intensity factor for a deflected crack
- k 2 :
-
Mode II stress intensity factor for an inclined crack
- K II :
-
Mode II stress intensity factor for a linear crack
- N :
-
number of fatigue cycles
- R :
-
nominal load ratio (= (K 1)min/(K 1,(max)
- R :
-
load ratio accounting for crack deflection (=k min/k max
- R :
-
load ratio accounting for crack deflection and crack closure (=k cl/k max)
- S :
-
length of the linear segment
- α:
-
angle of second deflection for long tilted crack
- δK eff :
-
effective stress intensity factor range accounting for deflection
- δK eff :
-
effective stress intensity factor range accounting for crack closure
- δK 1 :
-
nominal Mode I stress intensity factor range
- δK 1 :
-
average stress intensity factor range in a segment
- θ:
-
angle of first deflection for a long crack
- θo :
-
angle of initial inclination for a short crack
- θ1 :
-
angle of first deflection for a short crack
- δΣe :
-
fatigue limit
- δΣTH :
-
threshold cyclic stress range for short cracks
References
F. Erdogan and G. C. Sih:J. Basic Eng., 1963, vol. 85, p. 519.
W. W. Gerberich and K. A. Peterson: inMicro and Macro Mechanics of Crack Growth, K. Sadananda, B. B. Rath, and D. J. Michel, eds., TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1982, p. 1.
J. Lankford and D. L. Davidson: inAdvances in Fracture Research, D. Francois, ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1981, vol. 4, p. 899.
S. Suresh:Scripta Met., 1982, vol. 16, p. 995.
A. K. Vasudevan, P. E. Bretz, A. C. Miller, and S. Suresh:Mat. Sci. Eng., 1983, in press.
J. Lankford:Fat. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1982, vol. 5, p. 233.
S. N. Chatterjee:Int. J. Solids Struct., 1975, vol. 15, p. 521.
B. A. Bilby, G. E. Cardew, and I. C. Howard: inFracture 1977, D. M. R. Taplin, ed., University of Waterloo Press, 1977, vol. 3, p. 197.
H. Kitagawa, R. Yuuki, and T. Ohira:Eng. Fract. Mech., 1975, vol. 7, p. 515.
B. Cotterell and J. R. Rice:Int. J. Fract., 1980, vol. 16, p. 155.
K. T. Faber and A. G. Evans:Acta Met., 1983, vol. 31, p. 565.
F.-S. Lin and E. A. Starke:Mat. Sci. Eng., 1980, vol. 45, p. 153.
M. O. Speidel:Stress Corrosion Cracking of Aluminum Alloys, Ohio State University Report, Columbus, OH, 1975.
S. Suresh:Eng. Fract. Mech., 1983, vol. 18, p. 577.
F. Hourlier and A. Pineau: inAdvances in Fracture Research, D. Francois, ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1981, vol. 4, p. 1833.
G. Hua, M. W. Brown, and K. J. Miller:Fat. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1982, vol. 5, p. 1.
M. Truchon, M. Amestoy, and K. Dang-Van: inAdvances in Fracture Research, D. Francois, ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1981, vol. 4, p. 1841.
A. Otsuka, K. Mori, T. Ohshima, and S. Tsuyama:ibid., 1981, vol. 4, p. 1851.
R. Badaliance:Eng. Fract. Mech., 1980, vol. 13, p. 657.
A. B. Patel and R. K. Pandey:Fat. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1981, vol. 4, p. 65.
K. Tanaka:Eng. Fract. Mech., 1974, vol. 6, p. 493.
J. Lankford and D. L. Davidson:Acta Met., 1983, vol. 31, p. 1273.
D. L. Davidson:Fat. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1981, vol. 3, p. 229.
B. R. Lawn and T. R. Wilshaw:Fracture of Brittle Solids, Cambridge University Press, 1975.
P. C. Paris and G. C. Sih:Stress Analysis of Cracks, ASTM STP 381, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1965, p. 30.
M. A. Hussain, S. L. Pu, and J. Underwood:Fracture Analysis, Part II, ASTM STP 560, P. C. Paris and G. R. Irwin, eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, 1974, p. 2.
G. C. Sih:Int. J. Fract., 1974, vol. 10, p. 305.
J. J. Petrovic and M. G. Mendiratta:J. Am. Ceramic Soc., 1977, vol. 60, p. 463.
S. Suresh, G. F. Zamiski, and R. O. Ritchie:Metall. Trans. A, 1981, vol. 12A, p. 1435.
V. B. Dutta: M. S. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1983.
W. Elber: inDamage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures, ASTM STP 486, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1971, p. 230.
R. M. N. Pelloux:Eng. Fract. Mech., 1970, vol. 1, p. 697.
N. Walker and C. J. Beevers:Fat. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1979, vol. 1, p. 135.
K. Minakawa and A. J. McEvily:Scripta Met., 1981, vol. 15, p. 633.
S. Suresh and R. O. Ritchie:Metall. Trans. A, 1982, vol. 13A, p. 1627.
H. Suzuki and A. J. McEvily:Metall. Trans. A, 1979, vol. 10A, p. 475.
J. Wasynczuk: M. S. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1982.
V. B. Dutta, S. Suresh, and R. O. Ritchie: unpublished research, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1983.
A. K. Vasudevan and S. Suresh:Metall. Trans. A, 1982, vol. 13A, p. 2271.
F.-S. Lin and E. A. Starke:Mat. Sci. Eng., 1980, vol. 43, p. 65.
W. L. Morris, M. R. James, and O. Buck:Metall. Trans. A, 1981, vol. 12A, p. 57.
H. Kitagawa and S. Takahashi: inProc. 2nd Intl. Conf. on Mech. Beh. Mater., M. I. T. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1979, p. 717.
S. J. Hudak, Jr.:J. Eng. Mater. Tech., Trans. ASME, Ser. H, 1981, vol. 103, p. 26.
N. Dowling: inCracks and Fracture, ASTM STP 601, American Society for Testing and Mateials, Philadelphia, PA, 1976, p. 17.
D. Taylor and J. F. Knott:Fat. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1981, vol. 4, p. 220.
J. Schijve: inFatigue Thresholds, Blomet al., eds., EMAS Ltd., Warley, 1982, vol. 2, p. 881.
S. Suresh and R. O. Ritchie:Int. Met. Rev., in press.
K. Tanaka, Y. Nakai, and M. Yamashita:Int. J. Fract., 1981, vol. 17, p. 519.
M. H. El-Haddad, K. N. Smith, and T. H. Topper:J. Eng. Mater. Tech., Trans. ASME, Ser. H, 1979, vol. 101, p. 42.
S. Pearson:Eng. Fract. Mech., 1975, vol. 7, p. 235.
J. C. Newman, Jr.: inBehavior of Short Cracks in Airframe Components, Proc. 55th Specialists Meeting of AGARD Structural and Materials Panel, 1983, in press, Advisory Group for Aeronautical Research and Development, France.
P. J. E. Forsyth: inCrack Propagation, Proc. Symp., Cranfield College of Aeronautics, Cranfield Press, Cranfield, U. K., 1962, p. 76.
H. Ishikawa, H. Kitagawa, and H. Okamura: inProc. ICM3, K. J. Miller and R. F. Smith, eds., Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1979, vol. 3, p. 447.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Formerly with the University of California, Berkeley.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suresh, S. Crack deflection: Implications for the growth of long and short fatigue cracks. Metall Trans A 14, 2375–2385 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663313
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663313