Abstract
Basic research in speech and the lateralization of language is shown to illuminate the problems of reading and some of its disabilities. First, it is pointed out how speech, or language for the ear, differs markedly from reading, or language for the eye. Though the sounds of speech are a very complex code and the optical shapes of written language are a simple cipher or alphabet on the phonemes, we all perceive speech easily but read only with difficulty. Perceiving speech is easy because, as members of the human race, we all have access to a special physiological apparatus that decodes the complex speech signal and recovers the segmentation of the linguistic message. Reading is hard because the phonemic segmentation, which is automatic and intuitive in the case of speech, must be made fully conscious and explicit. The syllabic method supplemented by phonics (used with certain reservations) is suggested for remediation of segmentation problems. Second, it is posited that since the sounds of speech are processed differently from non-speech sounds, the two should not be diagnosed and remediated interchangeably. Third, it is shown that the relationships among cerebral lateralization for language, handedness and poor reading can now be studied more meaningfully because of the recent development of new techniques.
A truism often heard in the opening lecture of graduate classes in education is that we have few answers to the problems that beset us, only questions. In the field of reading, the difficulty may be owing at least in part to our impatient attempts to find immediate solutions for the teacher and the student in the classroom, and our consequent neglect of basic research. I should like to suggest today how knowledge of basic research in related disciplines may lead to clues for improving beginning reading instruction and the lot of the disabled reader—if only by affording us a deeper understanding of the reading process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annett, M. A classification of hand preference by association analysis.British Journal of Psychology, 1970,3, 303–321.
Benton, A. L., Meyers, R., & Polder, G. J. Some aspects of handedness.Psychiatrica Neurologia: Basel, 1962,144, 321–337.
Bloomfield, L. & Barnhart, C.Let’s Read. Detroit: Wayne State University, 1961.
Branch, C., Milner, B., & Rasmussen, T. Intercarotid sodium amytal for the lateralization of cerebral speech dominance.Journal of Neurosurgery, 1964,21, 399–405.
Cooper, F. S. Spectrum analysis.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1950,22, 761–762.
Cooper, F. S. Some instrumental aids to research on speech.Report on the Fourth Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Teaching. Mono graph Series No. 3. Washington: Geogretown University Press, 1953. Pp. 46–53.
Cooper, F. S., Liberman, A. M., & Borst, J. M. The interconversion of audible and visible patterns as a basis for research in the perception of speech.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1951,37, 318–325.
de Hirsch, K., Jansky, J.J. and Langford, W.S.Predicting Reading Failure. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.
Doehring, D. G.Patterns of Impairment in Specific Reading Disability. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1968.
Eimas, P. D., Siqueland, E. R., Jusczyk, P. & Vigorito, J. Speech perception in infants.Science, 1970,171, 303–306.
Fries, C. C.Linguistics and Reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1962.
Harris, C. M. A study of the building blocks in speech.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1953,25, 962–969.
Humphrey, M. E. Consistency of hand usage.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1951,21, 214–225.
Johnson, D. & Myklebust, H.Learning Disabilities. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1967.
Kimura, D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1961,15, 166–171.
Kimura, D. Left-right differences in the perception of melodies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964,16, 355–358.
Kimura, D. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening.Cortex, 1967,3, 163–178.
Knox, C. & Kimura, D. Cerebral processing of non-verbal sounds in boys and girls.Neuropsychologia, 1970,8, 227–237.
Liberman, A. M. The grammars of speech and language.Cognitive Psychology, 1970,1, 301–323.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. Perception of the speech code.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 431–461.
Liberman, I., Shankweiler, D., & Orlando, C. The lateralization of good and poor readers in the second and third grades (research in progress).
Mattingly, I. G. & Liberman, A. M. The speech code and the physiology of language. In K. N. Leibovic (Ed.),Information Processing in the Nervous System. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1969. Pp. 97–117.
Milner, B., Taylor, L., & Sperry, R. W. Lateralized suppression of dichotically presented digits after commissural section in man.Science, 1968,161, 184–185.
Orlando, C. Relationships between language laterality and handedness in eight and ten year old boys. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, 1971.
Orton, S. T. “Word-Blindness” in school children.Archives of Neurology Psychiatry, 1925,14, 581–615. Also in, Orton, J. L., ed.,“Word-Blindness in School Children and Other Papers on Strephosymbolia—1925–1946—by Samuel Torrey Orton, M.D. Pomfret, Conn.: The Orton Society, 1966.
Orton, S. T.Reading, Writing, and Speech Problems in Children. New York: Norton, 1937.
Rosenzweig, M. R. Representations of the two ears at the auditory cortex.American Journal of Physiology, 1951,167, 147–158.
Satz, P., Achenbach, K., & Fennell, E. Correlation between assessed manual laterality and predicted speech laterality in a normal population.Neuropsychologia, 1967,5, 295–310.
Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I., & Orlando, C. Handedness and language lateralization in poor readers (research in progress).
Shankweiler, D. Some observations on reading disability in relation to speech. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Aphasia, Ann Arbor, Michigan, October, 1967.
Shankweiler, D. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. Identification of consonants and vowels presented to left and right ears.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,19, 59–63.
Sparrow, S. S.Reading Disability: a Neurophysiological Investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, 1968.
Zangwill, O. L.Cerebral Dominance and Its Relation to Psychological Function. London: Oliver and Boyd, 1960.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Paper based on a talk given at the Twenty-first Annual Conference of The Orton Society, Washington, D.C., November 14, 1970.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liberman, I.Y. Basic research in speech and lateralization of language: Some implications for reading disability. Bulletin of the Orton Society 21, 71–87 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663712
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663712