Abstract
An evaluation of the CaO-SiO2 system has been made using a newly developed model, a two-sublattice model for ionic solutions. Two alternatives were tested. In the first one, three anions were assumed, O−2, SiO4 −4, and SiO3 −2. In the second one, SiO3 −2 was omitted. A set of parameter values describing the Gibbs energy of the liquid phase and solid phases was fixed for each alternative by a computer-operated optimization procedure called PARROT. Satisfactory assessments were achieved over the whole phase diagram range with both alternatives. The main difference between them occurs at the monotectic point. A comparison between calculated properties and experimental data is given.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A.D. Pelton and M. Blander:Metall. Trans. B, 1986, vol. 17B, pp. 805–15.
J. Taylor and A. Dinsdale: National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom, unpublished research, 1987.
H. Gaye and J. Weifringer:2nd Int. Symp. on Metallurgical Slags and Fluxes, Lake Tahoe, 1984, H.A. Fine and D.R. Gaskell, eds., pp. 357-75.
Y.E. Lee:CALPHAD, 1982, vol. 6 (4), pp. 283–91.
M. Hillert, B. Jansson, B. Sundman, and J. Ågren:Metall. Trans. A, 1985, vol. 16A, pp. 261–66.
D.A.R. Kay and J. Taylor:Trans. Faraday Soc., 1960, vol. 56, pp. 1372–83.
R.A. Sharma and F.D. Richardson:JISI, 1962, vol. 200, pp. 373–79.
J.L. Haas, Jr., G.R. Robinson, Jr., and B.S. Hemingway:J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1981, vol. 10, pp. 575–669.
R.A. Robie, B.S. Hemingway, and J.R. Fisher:U.S. Geological Survey Bull., 1979, vol. 1452, p. 456.
B.S. Hemingway and R.A. Robie:U.S. Geological Survey J. Res., 1977, vol. 5, pp. 413–29.
T.V. Charlu, R.C. Newton, and O.J. Kleppa:Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1978, vol. 42, pp. 367–75.
V.H. Wagner:Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1932, vol. 208, pp. 1–22.
J.C. Southard:Am. Chem. Soc. J., 1941, vol. 63, pp. 3142–46.
E.G. King:Am. Chem. Soc. J., 1957, vol. 79, pp. 5437–38.
S.S. Todd:Am. Chem. Soc. J., 1951, vol. 73, pp. 3277–78.
J.P. Coughlin and C.J. O’Brien:J. Phys. Chem., 1957, vol. 61, pp. 767–69.
R. Benz and C. Wagner:J. Phys. Chem., 1961, vol. 65, pp. 1308–11.
H.E. Gronow and H.I. Schwiete:Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1933, vol. 216, pp. 185–95.
E.M. Levin, C.R. Robbins, and H.F. McMurdie:Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, ACS, Westerville, OH, 1964.
E.M. Levin, C.R. Robbins, and H.F. McMurdie:Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, ACS, Westerville, OH, 1964, Fig. 4311.
J.D. Tewehy and P.C. Hess:Phys. Chem. Glasses, 1979, vol. 20, p. 41.
V.B.M. Hageman, G.J.K. van den Berg, H.J. Janssen, and H.A.J. Oonk:Phys. Chem. Glasses, 1986, vol. 27, pp. 100–06.
M. Hillert, B. Jansson, and B. Sundman:Metall. Trans. B, 1990, vol. 21B, pp. 404–06.
O. Redlich and A.T. Kister:Ind. Eng. Chem., 1948, vol. 40, pp. 345–48.
A. Dinsdale: National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom, unpublished research, 1987.
T. Barry: National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom, unpublished research, 1987.
B. Jansson: Internal Report D 57, Division of Physical Metallurgy, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
P.T. Carter and T.G. MacFarlane:JISI, 1957, vol. 185, pp. 62–66.
Yoanxi Zou, Jicheng Zhou, Yuanshen Xu, and Pengnian Zao:Acta Metall. Sin., 1982, vol. 18 (2), pp. 127–40.
H. Gaye and D. Coulombet: IRSID Report PCM-RZ. 1064, Mar. 1984.
R.H. Rein and J. Chipman:Trans. AIME, 1965.
J.D. Baird and J. Taylor:Trans. Faraday Soc., 1958, vol. 54, pp. 527–39.
P.L. Lin and A.D. Pelton:Metall. Trans. B, 1979, vol. 10B, pp. 667–75.
C.R. Masson, I.B. Smith, and S.G. Masson:Glass 1977, Proc. 11th Int. Cong, on Glass, Prague, 1977, J. Götz, ed., vol. 1, pp. 3–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Formerly Research Associate, Royal Institute of Technoloy
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hillert, M., Sundman, B. & Wang, X. An assessment of the CaO-SiO2 system. Metall Trans B 21, 303–312 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02664198
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02664198