Skip to main content
Log in

Electrocapillarity in the aluminum reduction cell

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of the current density on the interfacial tension between aluminum and cryolite containing melts was measured based on the sessile drop method and an X-ray radiographic technique. The experiments were carried out under constant current densities in graphite crucibles with BN lining. When the aluminum drop was the cathode, the interfacial tension was almost independent of the current density. During electrolysis, the interfacial tension increased with decreasing NaF/AlF3 ratio in a similar manner to that observed when no electrolysis was performed. The interfacial tension between aluminum and an electrolyte containing between 5 to 10 wt pct A1F3, 5 wt pct CaF2, and 5 wt pct A12O3 is 690 ± 60 mN/m for cathodic current densities between 0.1 and 0.6 A/cm2. Interruption of electrolysis caused an instantaneous decrease in the interfacial tension followed by a slow increase with time. This sudden drop together with a decrease in interfacial tension with reversal of cell polarity indicate that the metallic side of the interface has an excess positive charge. The interface was enriched with NaF during electrolysis as indicated by the slow recovery of the interfacial tension after current interruption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Grjotheim, W. E. Haupin, and B.J. Welch:Light Metals, Proceedings of Sessions 115th AIME Annual Meeting, H. O. Bonner, ed., New York, NY, 1985, pp. 679–94.

  2. J. W. Evans, Y. Zundelevich, and D. Sharma:Metall. Trans. B, 1981, vol. 12B, pp. 353–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Thonstad and Y. Liu:Light Metals, Proceedings of Sessions 110th AIME Annual Meeting, G. M. Bell, ed., Chicago, IL, 1981, pp. 303–12.

  4. T. Utigard and J.M. Toguri:Metall. Trans. B, 1985, vol. 16B, pp. 333–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Grjotheim, C. Krohn, M. Malinovsky, K. Matiasovsky, and J. Thonstad:Aluminum Electrolysis, 2nd ed., p. 146, Aluminum-Verlag, Düsseldorf, Germany, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Piontelli and G. Montanelli:Allumino, 1953, vol. 22, pp. 672–78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Piontelli:Metallurgia Ital., 1960, vol. 52, pp. 469–77.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Thonstad and S. Rolseth:Electrochim. Acta, 1978, vol. 23, pp. 223–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Thonstad and S. Rolseth:Electrochim. Acta, 1978, vol. 23, pp. 233–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Kozakevitch and G. Urbain:J. Iron Steel Inst., 1957, vol. 186, pp. 167–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J.F. Elliott and M. Mounier:Can. Metall. Quart., 1982, vol. 21, pp. 415–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Gaye, L. D. Lucas, M. Olette, and P. V. Riboud:Can. Metall. Quart., 1984, vol. 23, pp. 179–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Ogino, A. Nishiwaki, and S. Hara:Osaka Yakinkai Kaishi, 1973, vol. 13, p. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. A. Utigard: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Rotenberg, L. Boruvka, and A. W. Neumann:J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1983, vol. 93, pp. 169–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Grjotheim, C. Krohn, M. Malinovsky, K. Matiasovsky, and J. Thonstad:Aluminum Electrolysis, 2nd ed., Aluminum-Verlag Düsseldorf, Germany, 1982, p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.D. Edwards, C.S. Taylor, L. A. Cosgrove, and A. S. Russell:J. Electrochem. Soc, 1953, vol. 100, pp. 508–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Vajna:Allumino, 1950, vol. 19, pp. 541–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. K. Matiasovsky, J. Jaszova, and M. Malinovsky:Chem. Zvesti, 1963, vol. 17, pp. 605–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. G. A. Abramov, M. M. Vetyukov, I. P. Gupalo, A. A. Kostyukov, and L. N. Lozhkin:Teoreticheskie osnovy elektrometallurgii alyuminiya. Metallurgizdat, Moscow, USSR, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Kvande and H. Rorvik:Light Metals, Proceedings of Sessions 114th AIME Annual Meeting, H.O. Bohner, ed., New York, NY, 1985, pp. 671–78.

  22. R. C. Dorward:Metall. Trans., 1973, vol. 4, pp. 386–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Alonso and E. J. Finn:Fundamental University Physics, vol. 2,Fields and Waves, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1974, p. 520.

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. W. Dewing and P. Desclaux:Metall. Trans. B, 1977, vol. 8B, pp. 555–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. H.C. Mara, D.T. Wasan, and R. C. Kintner:Chem. Engineering Science, 1971, vol. 26, pp. 1615–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

T. UTIGARD, formerly Graduate Student, is now Research Engineer, Alusuisse, CH-3965 Chippis, Switzerland

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Utigard, T., Toguri, J.M. Electrocapillarity in the aluminum reduction cell. Metall Trans B 17, 547–552 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02670222

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02670222

Keywords

Navigation