Skip to main content
Log in

Optimizing fracture toughness and abrasion resistance in white cast irons

  • Published:
Metallurgical Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of twelve Cr-Mo white irons varying in carbide volume from 7 to 45 pct were tested for dynamic fracture toughness and wet sand abrasion resistance. Carbon content was varied from 1.4 to 3.9 pct. Two matrix microstructures were employed, and the compositions (copper and chromium content) were varied to assure constant matrix compositions. Chromium was varied from 11.6 to 25.7 pct. In addition, one composition of white iron was subjected to thirty different heat treatments to define the effect of matrix microstructure on dynamic fracture toughness and abrasion resistance. It was shown that for the abrasive wear system used, a carbide volume of about 30 pct represented an optimum quantity, above which abrasion resistance decreased. Martensitic irons provided consistently better abrasion resistance than austenitic irons. Dynamic fracture toughness decreased with carbide volume, as expected. Higher toughness values were obtained with predominantly austenitic matrix microstructures than with predominantly martensitic matrix microstructures. Considering both abrasion resistance and fracture toughness, it was shown that heat treated irons could provide an optimal combination of these properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. E. Norman, A. Solomon, and D. V. Doane:Trans. Am. Foundrymen’s Soc., 1959, vol. 67, pp. 242–56.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. M. Kruschov:Proc. Conf. Lubrication and Wear, p. 665, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. C. Hamaker and A. M. Bayer:Cobalt, 1968, no. 38, p. 3.

  4. A. R. Rosenfield and A. J. McEvily: AGARD Rep. 1973, AGARD-R-610, pp. 24–54.

  5. K. H. Zum Gahr:Arch. Eisenhuettenw., 1978, vol. 49, pp. 581–86.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Hornbogen and T. M. Motz:Int. Cast Metals J., 1977, vol. 2, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. H. Zum Gahr:Z. Metallic., 1977, vol. 68, pp. 783–92.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wear of Materials -1979, K. C. Ludema, W. A. Glaser, and S. K. Rhee, eds., Part Two, Abrasion, p. 266, ASME, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Czichos:Wear, 1977, vol. 41, pp. 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Kim: Unpublished research, Climax Molybdenum Company of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 1977.

  11. R. L. Miller:Trans. ASM, 1968, vol. 61, pp. 592–97.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Borik: SAE 700687, published September 1970 by Society of Automotive Engineers, New York.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Formerly Visiting Research Metallurgist, Climax Molybdenum Co. Research Laboratory.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gahr, KH.Z., Doane, D.V. Optimizing fracture toughness and abrasion resistance in white cast irons. Metall Trans A 11, 613–620 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02670698

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02670698

Keywords

Navigation