Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of heat treatment on the high-stress abrasion resistance and fracture toughness of alloy white cast irons

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of a range of austenitizing and subcritical (tempering) heat treatments on the high-stress abrasion resistance and fracture toughness of four commercially significant grades of alloy white cast iron was investigated. Complementing an earlier study[1] on the influence of a more limited range of heat treatments on the gouging abrasion performance of the same alloys, the results showed that the effect of austenitizing temperature on high-stress abrasion pin test weight loss differed for each alloy. With increasing austenitizing temperature, these results ranged from a substantial improvement in wear performance and retention of hardness through to vir-tually no change in wear performance and substantial falls in hardness. Fracture toughness, however, increased markedly in all alloys with increasing austenitizing temperature. Tempering treatments in the range 400 °C to 600 °C, following hardening at the austenitizing temperature used commonly in industrial practice for each alloy, produced significant changes in both hard-ness and wear performance, but negligible changes in fracture toughness. Most importantly, the data showed that selection of the correct temperature for subcritical heat treatment to reduce the retained austenite content for applications involving repeated impact loading is critical if abrasion resistance is not to suffer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I.R. Sare and B.K. Arnold:Metall. Mater. Trans. A,1995, vol. 26A, pp 357–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. ASTM A532-82, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1982.

  3. J. Dodd and J.L. Parks:Met. Forum, 1980, vol. 3, pp. 3–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H.L. Arnson, J.L. Parks, and D.R. Larsen: inIntermountain Minerals Symposium, R.Q. Barr, D.V. Doane, and K.H. Miska, eds., Climax Molybdenum, Ann Arbor, MI, 1982, pp. 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Blickensderfer, J.H. Tylczak, and J. Dodd: inWear of Materials 1983, K.C. Ludema, ed., ASME, New York, NY, 1983, pp. 471–76.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Blickensderfer, J.H. Tylczak, and G. Laird: inWear of Materials 1989, K.C. Ludema, ed., ASME, New York, NY, 1989, pp. 175–82.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K.-H. Zum Gahr and D.V. Doane:Metall. Trans. A, 1980, vol. 11A, pp. 613–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K.-H. Zum Gahr and G.T. Eldis:Wear, 1980, vol. 64, pp. 175–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Muscara and M.J. Sinnott:Met. Eng. Q., 1972, vol. 12 (2), pp. 21–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. M.C. Murphy, R.G. Kumble, J.T. Berry, and J.O. Outwater:Trans. Am. Foundrymen’s Soc, 1973, vol. 81, pp. 158–62.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.B. Gundlach and J.L. Parks:Wear, 1978, vol. 46, pp. 97–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J.D. Watson, P.J. Mutton, and I.R. Sare:Met. Forum, 1980, vol. 3, pp. 74–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. D.E. Diesburg and F. Borik: inMaterials for the Mining Industry, R.Q. Barr, ed., Climax Molybdenum, Ann Arbor, MI, 1974, pp. 15–38.

    Google Scholar 

  14. I.R. Sare:Met. Tech., 1979, vol. 6, pp. 412–19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. K.-H. Zum Gahr and W.G. Scholz:J. Met., 1980, vol. 32 (10), pp. 38–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. R.W. Durman:Br. Foundryman, 1981, vol. 74, pp. 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S.B. Biner:Can. Met. Q., 1985, vol. 4, pp. 155–62.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S.B. Biner:Can. Met. Q., 1985, vol. 24, pp. 163–67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J.D. Gates, K.D. Lakeland, J.W. Dalton, E.J. Quayle, and M. DeGlas: inMaterials United in the Service of Man, R.D. Davies and D.I. Hatcher, eds., Institute of Metals and Materials Australasia, Perth, Western Australia, 1990, vol. 1, pp. 5-3.1-5-3.10.

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. Maratray and A. Poulalion:Contribution to the Study of the Hardness of Martensitic Structures, the Retention of Austenite,its Control and its Transformation in High Carbon, High Chromium Ferrous Alloys, Climax Molybdenum Publication M-339 E, 1977.

  21. F. Maratray and A. Poulalion:Trans. Am. Foundrymen’s Soc, 1982, vol. 90, pp. 795–804.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. R.W.K. Honeycombe:Steels: Microstructure and Properties, Edward Arnold, London, 1981, pp. 152–60.

    Google Scholar 

  23. I.R. Sare and B.K. Arnold:Wear, 1989, vol. 131, pp. 15–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. K.-H. Zum Gahr:Microstructure and Wear of Materials, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987, pp. 181–87.

    Google Scholar 

  25. G.L.F. Powell and G. Laird:J. Mater. Sci., 1992, vol. 27, pp. 29–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sare, I.R., Arnold, B.K. The influence of heat treatment on the high-stress abrasion resistance and fracture toughness of alloy white cast irons. Metall Mater Trans A 26, 1785–1793 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02670766

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02670766

Keywords

Navigation