Skip to main content
Log in

The Ross-Dunlop debate revisited

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An alternative interpretation of the Ross-Dunlop debate of the 1940s is provided, which reveals little difference in the opinions of these two theorists on the role of optimizing behavior and of economic factors in explaining trade union behavior. Importantly, both saw theories of union activity based on simple economic maximands as unable to incorporate some “political” features of those unions. The recent wave of economic analyses of trade unions however seems to have answered such criticism to a large extent. A survey of this work is provided to show how many of Ross’s “unanswered questions” can be explained by models where rational trade unions maximize relatively straightforward objective functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Alchian, A. A. and H. Demsetz. “Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization.”American Economic Review 62 (1972): 777–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Addison, J. T. “The Role of Comparability in Wage Determination.”British Journal of Industrial Relations 13 (1975): 388–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. A. “Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 97 (1982): 543–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, O. C. and G. E. Johnson. “Bargaining Theory, Trade Unions and Industrial Strike Activity.”American Economic Review 59 (1969): 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atherton, W.The Theory of Union Bargaining Goals. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, D. and D. Crawford. “Labor Union Objectives and Collective Bargaining.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 99 (1984): 547–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. “A Public Choice Model of Trade Union Behavior and Membership.”Economic Journal 94 (1984): 883–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borland, J. “Aspects of the Economics of Trade Unions,” M.A. thesis, Department of Economics, University of Melbourne, 1984.

  • _____. “A Principal-Agent Model of Trade Union Behaviour.” Working Paper No. 135, Department of Economics, University of Melbourne, 1985a.

  • _____. “Trade Unions, Money Wage Rigidity and the Absence of Indexation.” Mimeo, University of Melbourne, 1985b.

  • Burton, J. “The Economic Analysis of the Trade Union as a Political Institution.” In J. J. Rosa (ed.),The Economics of Trade Unions. Netherlands: Martin Nijhoff.

  • Carmichael, H. L. “The Agent-Agents Problem: Payment by Relative Output.”Journal of Labor Economics 1 (1983): 50–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. H.What Is History? London: Penguin, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, J. T.Wage Determination Under Trade Unions. New York: Macmillan, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____.The Theory of Wage Determination. New York: Macmillan, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, R. L. and J. D. Reid. “An Agency Theory of the Union.” Mimeo, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1982.

  • Farber, H. S. “Individual Preferences and Union Wage Determination: The Case of the United Mine Workers.”Journal of Political Economy 86 (1978): 923–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____. “The Analysis of Union Behaviour.” NBER Working Paper No. 1502, 1984.

  • Frank, R. H. “Are Workers Paid their Marginal Products?”American Economic Review 74 (1984): 549–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, F. “Inequality and Arbitration of Wages in Australia: An Historical Perspective.” University of Sydney WP No. 70, 1983.

  • Gylfason, T. and A. Lindbeck. “Wage Rigidity and Wage Rivalry: An Oligopolistic Approach.” Seminar Paper No. 225, Institute for International Economic Studies, Sweden, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. E. “The Rigidity of Wages and the Persistence of Unemployment.”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, No. 2, 1975, pp. 301–49.

  • Hicks, J.The Crisis in Keynesian Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B. “Unions and Strikes with Asymmetric Information.”Journal of Labor Economics 2 (1984): 57–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. E. “Economic Analysis of Trade Unionism.”American Economic Review 64 (1975): 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M., D. Leonard and N. V. Long. “Labour Unions, Seniority and Unemployment.” Mimeo, University of N.S.W., 1983.

  • Kreps, D. and R. Wilson. “Reputation and Imperfect Information.”Journal of Economic Theory 27 (1983): 253–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E. “A Competitive Theory of Monopoly Unionism.”American Economic Review 73 (1983): 631–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, R. A. “A Range Theory of Wage Differentials.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 27 (1952): 253–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D.An Ownership Theory of the Trade Union. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. “Union Wage Policies: The Ross-Dunlop Debate Reopened.”Industrial Relations 11 (1972): 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, S. “The Optimality of Strikes in Labor Negotiations.” Mimeo. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, C.The Economic Analysis of Trade Unions. Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A.Prices and Quantities. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD,Wages and Labor Mobility, Paris, 1965.

  • Oswald, A. “Wage Determination in an Economy with Many Trade Unions.”Oxford Economic Papers 31 (1979): 369–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. “The Economic Theory of Trade Unions: An Introductory Survey.”Scandinavian Journal of Economics 87 (1985).

  • Pemberton, J. “Owner-Controlled, Managerial, and Employee-Controlled Models of the Trade Union.” University of Reading, Discussion Paper in Economics Series A, No. 152, 1982.

  • _____. “A Managerial Model of the Trade Union.” Mimeo, University of Reading, 1985.

  • Pencavel, J. H. “An Investigation into Industrial Strike Activity in Britain.”Economica 37 (1970): 239–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps Brown, E. H.The Inequality of Pay. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reder, M. “The Theory of Union Wage Policy.”Review of Economics and Statistics 34 (1952): 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____. “Job Security and the Nature of Union Power.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 13 (1959): 349–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M.Power and Privilege. New York: Universe Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A.Trade Union Wage Policy. Berkeley: California University Press, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. G.Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.

  • Sapsford, D.Labor Market Economics. London: George Allen and Urwin, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T.The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. and G. S. Becker. “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum.”American Economic Review 67 (1977): 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. “Theories of Wage Rigidity.” NBER Working Paper No. 1442, 1984.

  • Turner, H. A. and D. A. S. Jackson. “On the Stability of Wage Differences and Productivity-Based Wage Policies: An International Analysis.”British Journal of Industrial Relations 7 (1969): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work is based on chapter 1 of the author’s M.A. thesis at the University of Melbourne. Many thanks are due to Ian McDonald for his generous help, and to Greg Whitwell for his comments on an earlier draft of this paper. The author is presently a graduate student at Yale University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borland, J. The Ross-Dunlop debate revisited. Journal of Labor Research 7, 293–307 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685136

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685136

Keywords

Navigation