Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline and revitalization of environmental sociology

  • Natural Resources And The Environment And Sociology
  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emergence of environmental sociology in the 1970s, the decline of interest it experienced in the the early 1980s, and its revitalization since the late 1980s are described and linked to trends in societal interest in environmental problems. We suggest that the status of the field has been heavily dependent upon societal attention to environmental problems, in part due to the larger discipline’s ingrained assumption that the welfare of modern societies is no longer linked to the physical environment. We also suggest that growing recognition of the reality of global environmental change (GEC) poses a fundamental challenge to this “human exemptionalism paradigm,” and thus offers an opportunity for strengthening sociological interest in the environment. Understanding the causes and consequences of GEC calls for examination of societal-environmental interactions, the fundamental subject matter of environmental sociology. Unfortunately, early sociological work has largely ignored such interactions in favor of analyses of the “social construction” of GEC, Consequently, limitations of a social constructivist approach to GEC (and to environmental problems in general) are discussed, and a more inclusive research agenda is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Charles H. 1976.The Sociology of Survival: Social Problems of Growth. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, Stan L. 1975. “The Environment as a Social Problem.” InSocial Problems as Social Movements, A. L. Mauss, 566–605. Philadelphia: J. P. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 1987. “Resisting the Revival of Relativism.”International Sociology 2: 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Regina S. 1984. “Energy Policy: Changing the Rules of the Game.” InEnvironmental Policy in the 1980s: Reagan’s New Agenda, N. J. Vig and M. E. Kraft (eds.), 203–225. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, Gerald O. 1980.The Global 2000 Report to the President of the U.S. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barol, Bill. 1988. “The Eighties Are Over.”Newsweek (Jan. 4): 48.

  • Bell, Daniel. 1977. “Are There ‘Social Limits’ to Growth?” InProspects for Growth: Changing Expectations for the Future, K. D. Wilson (ed.), 13–26. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, Ted. 1989. “Marxism and Natural Limits: An Ecological Critique and Reconstruction.”New Left Review, 178 (November/December):51–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————, 1991. “Biology and Social Science: Why the Return of the Repressed Should Be Given A (Cautious) Welcome.”Sociology 25: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, Joel. 1989. “Afterword.” InImages of Issues: Typifying Contemporary Social Problems, J. Best (ed.) 243–253. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogard, William. 1989.The Bhopal Tragedy. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, Danny J. 1985. “When Governments Forecast.”Futures 17: 435–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, Jeffrey. 1989. “Environmental Politics in Japan: An Integrated Structural Analysis.”Sociological Forum, 4: 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Phil and Edwin J. Mikkelsen. 1990.No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia, and Community Action. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, Bunyan and Paul Mohai. 1992.Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards: A Time for Discourse. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, Robert D. 1983. “Solid Waste Sites and the Black Houston Community.”Sociological Inquiry, 53: 273–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————, 1990.Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, William R., Jr. 1971.Daydreams and Nightmares: A Sociological Essay on the American Environment. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, William R., Jr., Neil H. Cheek, Jr. and Lee Taylor (eds.). 1972.Social Behavior, Natural Resources, and the Environment. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, Frederick H. 1978. “Environmental Sociology: A New Paradigm?”The American Sociologist, 13: 252–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————, 1986. “Sociology and the Environment: The Winding Road Toward Human Ecology.”International Social Science Journal, 109: 337–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————, 1987. “New Directions in Environmental Sociology.”Annual Review of Sociology, 13: 465–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————, 1993. “Environmental Sociology as Science and Social Movement.”Environment, Technology, and Society Newsletter, 73 (Fall): 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, Frederick H., Ann P. Hawkins and Alison G. Power. 1990. “From Limits to Growth to Global Change.”Global Environmental Change, 1: 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, Frederick H. and Peter J. Taylor. 1992. “Environmental Sociology and Global Environmental Change: A Critical Assessment.”Society and Natural Resources, 5: 211–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cable, Sherry and Michael Benson. 1993. “Acting Locally: Environmental Injustice and the Emergence of Grassroots Environmental Organizations.”Social Problems, 40: 464–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, Lynton Keith. 1990.Between Two Worlds: Science, the Environmental Movement and Policy Choice. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton, William R., Jr. 1972. “Sociology in an Age of Fifth Wheels.”Social Forces, 50: 436–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————, Jr., 1980.Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————, Jr., 1993. “Carrying Capacity and the Death of a Culture: A Tale of Two Autopsies.”Sociological Inquiry, 63: 202–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catton, William R., Jr., and Riley E. Dunlap. 1978a. “Environmental Sociology: A New Paradigm.”The American Sociologist, 13: 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————, Jr., 1978b. “Paradigms, Theories, and the Primacy of the HEP-NEP Distinction.”The American Sociologist, 13: 256–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————, Jr., 1980. “A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant Sociology.”American Behavioral Scientist, 24: 15–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Stephen. 1992.Making Science: Between Nature and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Earth and Environmental Sciences. 1990.Our Changing Planet: The FY 1991 Research Plan. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, Stephen R. and J. Stephen Kroll-Smith. 1985. “The Chronic Technical Disaster: Toward a Social Scientific Perspective.”Social Science Quarterly, 66: 564–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— (eds.). 1991.Communities at Risk: Collective Responses to Technological Hazards. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cylke, F. Kurt, Jr. 1993.The Environment. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, Peter. 1992.Society and Nature: Towards a Green Social Theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————, 1993. “Society and Nature.” InDevelopments in Sociology: An Annual Review, M. Haralambos (ed.), 9: 141–166. Ormskirk, England: Causeway Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, Thomas. 1987. “Theory and Method in Social Impact Assessment.”Sociological Inquiry, 57: 54–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, Thomas and Linda Kalof, 1992. “Environmentalism Among Nation States.”Social Indicators Research, 26: 353–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, Thomas and Eugene A. Rosa. 1994. “Effects of Population and Affluence on CO2 Emissions.” Unpublished manuscript, Dept. of Sociology and Anthropology, Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, Thomas M. and Robert W. Rycroft. 1987.The Rish Professionals. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, Thomas, Paul C. Stern and Robert W. Rycroft. 1989. “Definitions of Conflict and Legitimation of Resources: The Case of Environmental Risk.”Sociological Forum, 4: 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, Riley E. 1993. “From Environmental to Ecological Problems.” InSocial Problems, C. Calhoun and G. Ritzer (Eds.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, Riley E., and William R. Catton, Jr. 1979 “Environmental Sociology.”Annual Review of Sociology, 5: 243–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————, Jr., 1983. “What Environmental Sociologists Have in Common (Whether Concerned with ‘Built’ or ‘Natural’ Environments).”Sociological Inquiry, 53: 113–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————, Jr., 1994. “Toward an Ecological Sociology: The Development, Current Status and Probable Future of Environmental Sociology.” InEcology, Society & the Quality of Social Life, W. V. D’Antonio, M. Sasaki and Y. Yonebayashi (eds.), 11–31, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. (Reprinted fromAnnals of the International Institute of Sociology, 3 [1992/93]: 263–284.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, Riley E., George H. Gallup, Jr. and Alec M. Gallup. 1993. “Of Global Concern: Results of the Health of the Planet Survey.”Environment, 35 (November): 6–15, 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, Riley E. and Kenneth E. Martin. 1983. “Bringing Environment into the Study of Agriculture.”Rural Sociology, 48: 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, Riley E. and Angela G. Mertig (eds.). 1992.American Environmentalism: The U.S. Environmental Movement, 1970–1990. Washington, D.C.: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, Riley E. and Rik Scarce. 1991. “The Polls—Poll Trends: Environmental Problems and Protection.”Public Opinion Quarterly, 55: 651–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, Riley E. and Kent D. Van Liere. 1984. “Commitment to the Dominant Social Paradigm and Concern for Environmental Quality.”Social Science Quarterly, 65: 1013–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgin, Duane. 1981.Voluntary Simplicity. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental and Energy Study Institute. 1991.Partnership for Sustainable Development: A New U.S. Agenda for International Development and Environmental Security. Washington, D.C.: Environmental and Energy Study Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA Science Advisory Board. 1990.Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental Protection. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evernden, Neil. 1992.The Social Creation of Nature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Nick. 1991. “Green Sociology.”Network (Newsletter of the British Sociological Association), 50 (May): 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, William R. 1986. “Social Impact Assessment.”Annual Review of Sociology, 12: 451–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————, 1988. “Perceived Risk, Real Risk: Social Science and the Art of Probabilistic Risk Assessment.”Science, 242 (Oct. 7): 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberg, William R., Scott Frickel and Robert Gramling. 1993. “The Sociocultural Definition of ‘Natural’ Resources.” Unpublished manuscript, Dept. of Rural Sociology, Univ. of Wisconsin.

  • Freudenburg, William R. and Robert Gramling. 1989. “The Emergence of Environmental Sociology.”Sociological Inquiry, 59: 439–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————, 1993. “Socioenvironmental Factors and Development Policy: Understanding Opposition and Support for Offshore Oil Development.”Sociological Forum, 8: 341–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, William R. and Susan K. Pastor. 1992. “Public Responses to Technological Risks: Toward a Sociological Perspective,”Sociological Quarterly, 33: 389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, Al. 1992.Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, Peter, J. Timmons Roberts and Jodie L. Manale. 1993. “Social Roots of Environmental Damage: A World-Systems Analysis of Global Warming and Deforestation,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Miami Beach.

  • Guterbock, Thomas M. 1990. “The Effects of Snow on Urban Density Patterns in the United States.”Environment and Behavior, 22: 358–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, Constance, 1984. “A ‘Prolife’ Population Delegation?”Science, 224 (June 22): 1321–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, Craig R. and Frederick H. Buttel. 1982.Environment, Energy, and Society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Alwyn. 1987. “The Violence of Materialism in Advanced Industrial Society: An Eco-Sociological Approach.”British Journal of Sociology, 35: 19–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————, 1990. “Social Symbiosis: A Gaian Critique of Contemporary Social Theory.”The Ecologist, 20: 108–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, Willett, James S. Boster and Jennifer Hartley. 1994.Their Children’s Earth: A Study of Mainstream American Environmentalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Richard A. 1992. “Greenhouse Science Survives Skeptics.”Science, 256 (May 22): 1138–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klausner, Samuel Z. 1971.On Man in His Environment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogman, Naomi T. and JoAnne DeRouen Darlington. 1992. “Environmental Sociology: Ignored By Its Own Discipline.” Unpublished ms., Dept. of Sociology, Colorado State University.

  • Kroll-Smith, J. Stephen and Stephen R. Couch. 1991. “What is a Disaster? An Ecological-Symbolic Approach to Resolving the Definitional Debate.”International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 9: 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll-Smith, J. Stephen and Shirley Laska. 1994. “The GEC Debate: Notes on Theorizing and Researching the Environment.”Environment, Technology, and Society Newsletter, 74: 1, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laska, Shirley Bradway. 1993. “Environmental Sociology and the State of the Discipline.”Social Forces, 72: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Last, John M. 1993. “Global Change: Ozone Depletion, Greenhouse Warming, and Public Health.”Annual Review of Public Health, 14: 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Adeline Gordon. 1982.Love Canal: Science, Politics, and People. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1979. “Predicting the Future of Post-Industrial Society: Can We Do It?” InThe Third Century: America as a Post-Industrial Society, S.M. Lipset (ed.), 1–35. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, Philip D. and Wolfgang Rudig. 1986. “Political Ecology and the Social Sciences—The State of the Art.”British Journal of Political Science, 16: 513–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutzenhiser, Loren. 1992. “A Cultural Model of Household Energy Consumption.”Energy, 17: 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————, 1993. “Social and Behavioral Aspects of Energy Use.”Annual Review of Energy and Environment, 18: 247–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————, 1994. “Sociology, Energy and Interdisciplinary Environmental Science,”The American Sociologist, 25: 58–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, Allan and Jinling Lee. 1993. “Sounding the Global Alarm: Environmental Issues in the U.S. National News.”Social Studies of Science, 23: 681–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, Jorgen Randers, and William W. Behrens III. 1972.The Limits to Growth. Washington, D.C.: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, William H. 1970.Man and His Urban Environment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, Lester. 1982.Environmentalists: Vanguard for a New Society. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Roberta Balstad. 1990. “Social Science and the Challenge of Global Environmental Change.”International Social Science Journal, No. 130: 609–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Robert Cameron. 1990. “Public Opinion and the Green Lobby: Poised for the 1990s?” InEnvironmental Policy in the 1990s: Toward a New Agenda, N. J. Vig and M. E. Kraft (eds.), 81–99. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, Harvey and Ross Charles Follett. 1971. “Air Pollution as a Problem for Sociological Research.” InAir Pollution and the Social Sciences, P. B. Downing (ed.), 15–36. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Denton E. 1976. “Growth, Environment, Equity and Scarcity.”Social Science Quarterly, 57: 292–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Raymond. 1994. “The Sociological Construction of Science Without Nature.”Sociology, 28: In press.

  • Newby, Howard. 1991. “One World, Two Cultures: Sociology and the Environment.”Network (Newsletter of the British Sociological Association), 50 (May): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, Robert. 1979. “The Rape of Progress.”Public Opinion, 2 (June/July): 2–6, 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, David. 1989.Earth Rising: Ecological Belief in an Age of Science. Corvallis: Oregon State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, James. 1988. “Capitalism, Nature, Socialism: A Theoretical Introduction.”Capitalism/Nature/Socialism, 1: 11–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, Dixie Lee and Lou Guzzo. 1993.Environmental Overkill. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Gateway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, Eugene A., Gary E. Machlis and Kenneth M. Keating. 1988. “Energy and Society.”Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, F. Sherwood. 1993. “President’s Lecture: The Need for Scientific Communication with the Public.”Science, 260 (11 June): 1571–1576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel, Thomas K. 1989. “Population, Development, and Tropical Deforestation: A Cross-national Study.”Rural Sociology, 54: 327–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, Allan. 1975. “Social Syntheses of the Societal-Environmental Dialectic: The Role of Distributional Impacts.”Social Science Quarterly, 56: 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————, 1980.The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, Allan and Kenneth Alan Gould. 1994.Environment and Society: The Enduring Conflict. New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, Allan, Nicholas Watts and Klaus Zimmerman (eds.). 1986.Distributional Conflicts in Environmental-Resource Policy. New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. Clay, Robert F. Meier, and Robert J. Griffin, 1979. “Constructing a Social Problem: The Press and the Environment.”Social Problems, 27: 38–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, James, F., Jr. 1984. “The Social Fabric at Risk: Toward the Social Transformation of Risk Analysis.”American Sociological Review, 49: 711–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sills, David L., C. P. Wolf and Vivien B. Shelanski (eds.). 1982.Accident at Three Mile Island: The Human Dimensions. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, Cheryl Simon with Ruth S. DeFries. 1990.One Earth/One Future: Our Changing Global Environment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, I.G. 1993.Interpreting Nature: Cultural Constructions of the Environment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Julian L. 1981.The Ultimate Resource. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Julian L. and Herman Kahn (eds.). 1984.The Resourceful Earth. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sismondo, Sergio. 1993. “Some Social Constructions.”Social Studies of Science, 23: 515–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spaargaren, Gert and Arthur P. J. Mol. 1992. “Sociology, Environment and Modernity: Ecological Modernization as a Theory of Social Change.”Society and Natural Resources, 5: 323–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Paul C. 1993. “A Second Environmental Science: Human-Environment Interactions.”Science, 260 (25 June): 1897–1899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Paul C., Oran R. Young and Daniel Druckman (eds). 1992).Global Environmental Change: Understanding the Human Dimensions. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale, Jerry. 1989. “Pro-Growth, Limits to Growth, and a Sustainable Development Synthesis.”Society and Natural Resources, 2: 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taubes, Gary. 1993. “The Ozone Backlash.”Science, (11 June): 1580–1583.

  • Taylor, Peter J. and Frederick H. Buttel. 1992. “How Do We Know We Have Global Environmental Problems?”Geoforum, 23: 405–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., II, R. E. Kasperson, W. B. Meyer, K. M. Down, D. Golding, J. X. Kasperson, R. C. Mitchell and S. J. Ratick. 1990. “Two Types of Global Environmental Change.”Global Environmental Change, 1: 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungar, Sheldon. 1992. “The Rise and (Relative) Decline of Global Warming as a Social Problem.”Sociological Quarterly, 33: 483–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Union of Concerned Scientists. 1993.World Scientists’ Warning Briefing Book. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unseld, Charles T., Denton E. Morrison, David L. Sills and C. P. Wolf (eds.). 1979.Sociopolitical Effects of Energy Use and Policy. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Liere, Kent D. and Riley E. Dunlap. 1981. “Environmental Concern: Does It Make A Difference How It’s Measured?”Environment and Behavior, 13: 651–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Steenbergen, Bart. 1990. “Potential Influence of the Holistic Paradigm on the Social Sciences,”Futures, 22: 1071–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viviano, Frank. 1980. “Happy Days Again.”Lewiston Tribune, (June 8): 2B.

  • Weigert, Andrew J. 1991. “Transverse Interaction: A Pragmatic Perspective on Environment as Other.”Symbolic Interaction, 14: 353–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, Daniel. 1982. “Reagan and the National Psyche.”Psychology Today, 16 (Jan.): 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelovich, Daniel and Bernard Lefkowitz. 1980. “The Public Debate on Growth: Preparing for Resolution.”Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 17: 95–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanitsky, Oleg. 1992. “Environmental Sociology in the Former USSR: An Overview.” Paper presented at the ISA Conference on Current Developments in Environmental Sociology, Woudschoten, the Netherlands, June.

  • Yearley, Steven. 1991.The Green Case: A Sociology of Environmental Issues, Arguments and Politics. London: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Sociology, Washington State University, 99164-4020, Pullman, WA

    Riley E. Dunlap (professor of sociology and rural sociology) & William R. Catton (Professor Emeritus of sociology)

Authors
  1. Riley E. Dunlap
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William R. Catton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunlap, R.E., Catton, W.R. Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline and revitalization of environmental sociology. Am Soc 25, 5–30 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691936

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691936

Keywords

Search

Navigation