Skip to main content
Log in

The adoption of external networking by American schools

  • Symposium On Electronic Communication And Sociology
  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hypotheses from diffusion and resource dependence theory are applied to the explanation of participation in external networking (inter-networking) by schools. A national probability sample of 571 U.S. K-12 schools was used to test factors predicting schools’ use of external networks for instructional purposes. Early (vs late) adoption of computers did not predict later involvement in networking. Neither school spending nor rural region predicted network participation, except through the intervening variable of computer density. Thus, no matter how a school has acquired computers, once the base has been established it serves as an essential ingredient in taking the next step into external networking. The results were disappointing for diffusion theory and certainly point toward further investigation of this phenomenon. The findings also point to the importance of building a technological infrastructure in order to boost and leverage many of the instructional reform initiatives in education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht, Gary L. 1979. “Defusing Technological Change in Juvenile Courts.”Sociology of Work and Occupations 6, 3 (August): 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Robert L. and David J. Ortineau. 1988. “Exploring Consumers Attitudes and Use Behaviors in Monitoring the Diffusion of a Technology-based Discontinuous Innovation.”Journal of Business Research 17: 283–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Ronald E. (Ed). 1993.Computers in American Schools 1992: An Overview. Minneapolis, MN: IEA Computers in Education Study, 909 Social Sciences Bldg, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Ronald E. 1995. Estimates of Hardware in American Schools, (memo) Minneapolis, MN: IEA Computers in Education Study, 909 Social Sciences Bldg, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brancheau, James. 1987. “The Diffusion of Information Technology: Testing and Extending Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of EndUser Computing.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Management Sciences, University of Minnesota, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D.K. 1988. “Educational Technology and School Organization.” In R.S. Nickerson, ed.Technology and Education: Looking toward 2020. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J., E. Katz, and H. Menzel. 1957. “The Diffusion of an Innovation among Physicians.”Sociometry, 20:253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danko, W.D. and J.M. MacLachlan. 1983. “Research to Accelerate the Diffusion of a New Innovation: The Case of Personal Computers.”Journal of Advertising Research. 23:39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, M.D. and J.W. Gentry. 1983. “Characteristics of Adopters and Non-adopters of Home Computers.”Journal of Consumer Research. 10:225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, William H., Patrick Sweet, and Everett M. Rogers. 1989. “Socioeconomic Status and the Early Diffusion of Personal Computing in the United States.”Social Science Computer Review 7,3 (Fall): 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H. and T.S. Robertson. 1985. “A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 11: 398–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, Jan. 1993. “Technology and the Organization of Schooling.”Communications of the ACM 36,5 (May), 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, B. (forthcoming) “Learning and teaching on the Internet: Contributing to Educational Reform.” In Keller, James, ed. Public Access to the Internet. Cambridge, MA: JFK School of Government, Harvard University.

  • IEA. 1995. IEA Computers in Education Study, USA, Codebooks. Minneapolis, MN: IEA Computers in Education Study, 909 Social Sciences Bldg, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnan, Shon. 1993. “The Educational Computing Infrastructure.” In R.E. Anderson, ed.Computers in American Schools 1992: An Overview. Minneapolis, MN: IEA Computers in Education Study, Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuarrie, Edward F. 1989. “The Impact of a Discontinuous Innovation: Outcomes Experienced by Owners of Home Computers.”Computers in Human Behavior 5:227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Means, Barbara. 1994. “Introduction: Using Technology to Advance Educational Goals.” in Means, Barbara, ed.Technology and Education Reform: The Reality Behind the Promise. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). 1995.Advanced Telecommunications in U. S. Public Schools, K-12. (Preliminary report of the 1994 Fast Response Survey) Washington DC: NCES, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelgrum, Willem J., and Tjeerd Plomp. 1991.The Use of Computers in Education Worldwide. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelgrum, Willem J. and Tjeerd Plomp (Editors). 1993.The IEA Study of Computers in Education: Implementation of an Innovation in 21 Education Systems. Elmsford, N.Y.: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. 1978.Organizational Design. Arlington Heights, IL: AHM Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. 1983.Diffusion of Innovations (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. and R. Agarwala Rogers. 1976.Communications in Organizations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Everett M. and F. Shoemaker. 1971.Communications of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuijnman, Albert C. and Alfons C. A. ten Brummethuis. 1993. “Predicting Computer Use in Six Systems: Structural Models of Implementation Indicators.” In Pelgrum, Willem J. and Tjeerd Plomp, eds.The IEA Study of Computers in Education: Implementation of an Innovation in 21 Education Systems. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress. (1988)Power on! New tools for teaching and learning. (OTA-SET-379 Office of Technology Assessment) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman, Meera P. 1991. “The Impact of Innovativeness and Innovation Type on Adoption.”Journal of Retailing 67, 1: 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, Gerald, Robert Duncan, and Jonny Holbek. 1973.Innovations and Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald E. Anderson.

Additional information

where he has been since completing his Ph.D. at Stanford University in 1970. His primary specialty has been computing: developing computer-related methods in sociology as well as doing research on the social aspects of information technology. Shon Magnan is a Ph.D. candidate in sociology at the University of Minnesota and a research analyst at Questar Data Systems in Eagan Minnesota.

This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number SED-9154511. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of the National Science Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, R.E., Magnan, S.M. The adoption of external networking by American schools. Am Soc 27, 55–64 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691997

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691997

Keywords

Navigation