Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The emergence of knowledge systems thinking: A changing perception of relationships among innovation, knowledge process and configuration

  • Forethoughts
  • Published:
Knowledge and Policy

Abstract

As agriculture develops, policy and management decisions increasingly focus on agricultural innovation emerging from utilizing knowledge and/or technology. This paper considers models for underpinning knowledge and technology policy and management. It describes the emergence of knowledge systems thinking. The system construct is applied to actors (individuals, networks and institutions) involved in knowledge processes. These actors potentially form a highly articulated and complex whole. Knowledge policy and management focus on measures that enhance the synergy between actors. Knowledge systems are viewed as “soft systems,” i.e., they only become systems as a result of active construction and joint learning. The soft systems perspective facilitates the identification of various knowledge system models, which have consequences for policy and management decisions with respect to investment, design, and training. In an attempt to create a unifying theory for these models, it is posited that these models are consistent combinations of innovation, knowledge process and structural configuration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ascroft, J.R., N. Röling, J. Kariuki, and F. Wa Chege (1973). Extension and the forgotten farmer. Wageningen: Agricultural University. Bulletin van de Afdelingen Sociale Wetenschappen, no. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, J.A. (1987). The effects of different types of farmer participation on the management of on-farm trials.Agricultural Administration and Extension, 24: 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawden, R.J. and R. Packam (1991). Systems praxis in the education of the agricultural systems practitioner. Richmond (NSW): University of Western Sidney-Hawkesbury. Paper presented at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences. Östersund, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, G.M., W. Dissanayake and S. Konoshima (Eds.) (1986).Knowledge Generation, Exchange and Utilization. Boulder (Co.): Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C. (1990). Cooperative extension roles and relationships for a new era. A new interdependence model and evaluation synthesis to foster work with other agencies and organizations. Washington: USDA. Publication available from National Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield Va 22161, P.B. 90-199530. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P.L. and Th. Luckman (1967).The Social Construction of Reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City: Doubleday and Middlesex: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S. and J. Farrington (1990). Farm Systems Research and the Rural Poor: The Historical, Institutional, Economic and Political Context. Paper for the 10th Annual AFSRE Symposium. East Lansing (Mich.): Michigan State University, Institute for International Agriculture, October 14–17.

  • Bonnen, J.T. (1987). US Agricultural Development: Transforming Human Capital, Technology and Institutions. In: B.F. Johnson, C. Luiselli, C. Contreran, and R. Norton (Eds.).US-Mexico Relations: Agriculture and Rural Development. Stanford CA: Stanford U.P. Pgs. 267–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, L. (Ed.) (1990). From Common Ignorance to Shared Knowledge. Knowledge Networks in the Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica. Wageningen (Neth.): Agricultural University, Wageningen Studies in Sociology number 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. and E. Mikkelsen (1990).No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia and Community Action. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, L. (1990). Planning agroforestry extension projects: The CARE international approach in Kenya. In: Budd, W.W., I. Duchart, L. Hardesty and F. Steiner (Eds.).Planning for Agroforestry. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Pp. 101–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. and J. Law (1989). On the construction of socio-technical networks: content and context revisited.Knowledge in Society: Studies in the Sociology of Science Past and Present, Vol 8, pp. 57–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1991). Community participation: a new frontier in land management. Keynote address to the International Conference on Sustainable Land Management. New Zealand, November.

  • Cantril, H. (1965).The Pattern of Human Concerns. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamala, S. and P. Mortiss (1990).Working Together for Land Care. Group Management Skills and Strategies. Bowen Hills (Queensland): Australian Academic Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. and J. Jiggins (1987). Agricultural Research for Resource-Poor Farmers: A parsimonious paradigm.Agricultural Administration and Extension, 27.

  • Chambers, R. (1989).To make the flip: Strategies for Participatory Research and Design of Undervalued Resource Agriculture. Leusden (Netherlands): ETC/ILEIA. Proceedings of ILEIA Workshop on PTD, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981).Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chicester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. and J. Scholes (1990).Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chicester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. and N. Staunton (1989).Innovation in Technology and Organization. New York: Routledge, Champman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, M. (1989). On-farm research with a farming systems perspective. In: Roberts, N. (Ed.).Agricultural Extension in Africa. A World Bank Symposium. Washington: World Bank. Pp. 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darré, Jean Paul (1985).La Parole et la Technique. L’univers de pensee des eleveurs du Ternois. Paris: l’Harmattan

    Google Scholar 

  • Dissanayake, W. (1991). Knowledge, culture, and power: some theoretical issues related to the agricultural knowledge and information system framework.Knowledge and Policy, this volume.

  • Dupré, G. (Ed) (1991).Savoirs Paysans et Développement. Paris: Karthala-Ostrom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S.N. (1988). Explorations in the Sociology of Knowledge: the Soteriological Axis in the Construction of Domains of Knowledge.Cultural Traditions and Worlds of Knowledge: Explorations in the Sociology of Knowledge, Vol7:1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, P. (1990). Knowledge management in agriculture: building upon diversity.Knowledge in Society, 3 (3): 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel P., A. de Groot and S. Seegers (1991). RAAKS Manual: Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Knowledge Systems. Wageningen (the Netherlands): Agricultural University, Department of Extension Science. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, P, and S. Seegers (1991). Linkage Strategies: different technology systems require a different design and management of linkages. The Hague: ISNAR/RTTL, summary report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, R.E., P.E. Waggoner and V.W. Ruttan (1979). Economic Benefits from Research: An Example from Agriculture.Science 205, 14 September: 1101–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILEIA (1989).Proceedings ILELA Workshop PTD. Leusden (Neth.): ETC/ILEIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelock, R.G. (1986). Modelling the Knowledge System. In: Beal, G.M., W. Dissanayake and S. Konoshima (Eds.).Knowledge Generation, Exchange and Utilization. Boulder (Co.): Westview Press. Pp. 77–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havelock, R.G. (1973).Planning for Innovation through Dissemination and Utilization of Knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, CRUSK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort, A.W. (1988). Agricultural production potentials: Inherent or the result of investments in technology development.Agricultural Administration and Extension, 30: 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M.C. (1985). Social systems theory and practice: the need for a critical approach.International Journal of General Systems, Vol 10: 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keiter, R.B. and M.S. Boyce (1991).The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: Redefining America’s Wilderness Heritage. Boston: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, S. and N. Rosenberg (1986). An Overview of Innovation. In: Landau, R. and N. Rosenberg (Eds.).The Positive Sum Strategy. Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington (DC): National Academic Press. Pp. 275–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodama, F. (1990). Technological entropy dynamics: towards a taxonomy of national R&D efforts. In: Sigurdson, J. (Ed.).Measuring the Dynamics of Technological Change. London: Pinter Publishers. Pp. 146–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1985).Marketing for nonprofit organizations. Chicago: Aldine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987).Science in Action. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwis, C., N. Long, and M. Villareal (1990). Equivocations on Knowledge Systems Theory: An Actor-Oriented Critique.Knowledge in Society 3 (3):19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Moigne, G. (1991). Sustainability of Water resources. Washington: World Bank: Eleventh Agricultural Symposium: Agricultural Issues in the Nineties. January 9–11. Sponsored by the Agriculture and Rural Development Department and Training Division.

  • Leonard, D. (1985 2nd ed.).Reaching the peasant farmer: organization theory and practice in Kenya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linstone, H. (1989). Multiple perspectives on technology diffusion: insights and lessons. Paper for International Conference on Diffusion of Technologies and Social Behaviour. 14–16 June, Laxenburg, Austria.

  • Lionberger, H. and C. Chang (1970).Farm Information for Modernizing Agriculture: The Taiwan System. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. (1984). Creating space for change: a perspective on the sociology of development.Sociologia Ruralis, 24: 168–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. and J.D. van der Ploeg (1989). Demythologizing planned intervention.Sociologia Ruralis, 29 (3/4):226–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, J.K. (1987). Making Extension Effective: The role of extension/research linkages. In: Rivera, W. and S. Schramm (Eds.).Agricultural Extension Worldwide. New York: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minzberg, H. (1979).The Structuring of Organizations. A Structuring of Research. Englewood Cliffs (N.J.): Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. (1990).The Levers of Riches, Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moris, J. (1989). Extension under East African field conditions. In: Roberts, N. (Ed.).Agricultural Extension in Africa. A World Bank Symposium. Washington: World Bank. Pgs. 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, U.J. (1980). Institutionalization of Knowledge Flows.Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture. Vol 30, special issue.

  • North, D.C. (1990).Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. and R. Waterman (1984).In search of excellence: lessons from America’s best run companies. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanco, A. (1991).The Agricultural Technology Innovation Process in Mexico: An Analysis of INIFAP. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University, Unpublished PhD Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, R. (1981).The knowledge cycle. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (1983).Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M., J.D. Eveland, and A.S. Dean (1976).Extending the agricultural extension model. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University, Institute for Communication Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N. and H. de Zeeuw (1983).Improving the quality of rural poverty alleviation. Report of the Working Party “The Small Farmer and Development Cooperation.” Wageningen: IAC

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N. (1986). Extension science: increasingly preoccupied with knowledge systems.Sociologia Ruralis, 25: 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N. (1988).Extension Science. Information Systems in Agricultural Development. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N., J. Jiggins and D. Carrigan (1987). Extension as part of an agricultural knowledge system. In: Littman, M. (Ed.).Rural Extension in an Era of Challenge. Proceedings of the Australasian Agricultural Extension Conference, Brisbane 20–22 Oct.:796–803. Brisbane: Queensland Department of Primary Industries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N. (1990). The Agricultural Research-Technology Transfer Interface: A Knowledge System Perspective. In: Kaimowitz, D. (Ed.).Making the Link. Agricultural Research and Technology Transfer in Developing Countries. Boulder (Co): Westview Press, Special Studies in Agricultural Science and Technology. Pp. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N. and Engel, P (1990). Knowledge Management and Information Technology.Knowledge in Society, 3 (3): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N. and S. Seegers (1991). Designing Knowledge Systems for Farm Innovation: a synthesis of some results of ISNAR’s RTTL study for NARSs, IARCs and Donor Agencies. The Hague: ISNAR, Research/Technology Transfer Linkages Project. Paper for the Synthesis Seminar, ISNAR, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N. and E. Van de Fliert (1991). Beyond the Green Revolution: capturing efficiencies from integrated agriculture. Indonesia’s IPM Program provides a generic case. Jakarta: National Program for Development and Training of Integrated Pest Management in Rice-Based Cropping Systems. Report on the IPM Program.

  • Ruttan, V. (1986). Technical Change and Innovation in Agriculture. In: Landau, R. and N. Rosenberg (Eds.).The Positive Sum Strategy. Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington DC: National Academic Press. Pp. 333–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, H. and D. Leonard (1990). The political economy of the development and transfer of agricultural technologies. In: Kaimowitz, D. (Ed.).Making the Link. Agricultural Research and Technology Transfer in Developing Countries. Boulder (Co): Westview Press, Special Studies in Agricultural Science and Technology. Pp. 43–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriskanadarajah, N., R.J. Bawden and R.G. Packam (1989). System agriculture: a paradigm for sustainability. Paper presented at the ninth Annual Farming Systems Research/Extension Symposium, University of Arkansas, USA, October 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, S.N. (1990). Rethinking ways of Assisting the Rural Poor. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University, International Development Programme, public lecture, 8 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tendler, J. (1982). Rural projects through urban eyes: an interpretation of the World Bank’s new style development projects. Washington: World Bank. Staff Working Paper 532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky, L. and M. Fleischer (1990).The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington (Mass.): Lexington Books, D.C. Heath and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1987). Critical heuristics of social systems design.European Journal of Operations Research, 31:276–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Beek, P. (1991). Using a workshop to create a rich picture: defusing the ponded pastures conflict in central Queensland. Paper for the Workshop on Managing Complex Issues in Uncertain Environments: Systems Methodologies in Agriculture. Brisbane: Queensland Department of Primary Industries, 26–27 August.

  • Wilson, M. and Morren, G. (1990).Systems Approaches for Improvement in Agriculture and Resource Management. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijeratne, M. (1989).Farmer, Extension and Research in Sri Lanka: An Empirical Study of the Agricultural Knowledge System with Special Reference to Rice Production in Matara District. Wageningen: Agricultural University, PUDOC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the Department of Extension Science, the Agricultural University Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Niels Röling (professor and chair)

Authors
  1. Niels Röling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Currently, he is the director of an international program on “Comparative research in knowledge systems in support of sustainable agriculture.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Röling, N. The emergence of knowledge systems thinking: A changing perception of relationships among innovation, knowledge process and configuration. Knowledge and Policy 5, 42–64 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692791

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692791

Keywords

Search

Navigation