Skip to main content
Log in

PHOBOS at RHIC: Some global observations

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Particle production in Au+Au collisions has been measured in the PHOBOS experiment at RHIC for a range of collision energies for a large span of pseudorapidities, |η| < 5.4. Three empirical observations have emerged from this data set which require theoretical examination. First, there is clear evidence of limiting fragmentation. Namely, particle production in central Au + Au collisions, when expressed as dN/dη′ ( η′ ≡ – ybeam), becomes energy independent at high energy for a broad region of η′ around η′ = 0. This energy-independent region grows with energy, allowing only a limited region (if any) of longitudinal boost-invariance. Second, there is a striking similarity between particle production in e+eand Au + Au collisions (scaled by the number of participating nucleon pairs). Both the total number of produced particles and the longitudinal distribution of produced particles are approximately the same in e+eand in scaled Au + Au. This observation This presentation is based in large part on the PHOBOS summary talk by M Baker at the16th Int. Conf. on Ultrarelativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions, Quark Matter 2002, Nantes, France was not predicted and has not been explained. Finally, particle production has been found to scale approximately with the number of participating nucleon pairs for (N part ) > 65. This scaling occurs both for the total multiplicity and for highp T particles (3 <p T < 4.5 GeV/c).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B B Backet al,Nucl. Instrum. Methods, to be published

  2. R Nouiceret al, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A461, 143 (2001)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. B B Backet al, Nucl. Phys. A698, 416c (2002)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. B B Backet al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3100 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. B B Backet al, Phys. Rev. C65, 061901R (2002)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. B B Backet al, arXiv: nucl-ex/0210015;Phys. Rev. Lett. (submitted)

  7. B B Backet al, arXiv:nucl-ex/0205021;Phys. Rev. Lett. (in press)

  8. S Manlyet al, Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Ultrarelativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions (Quark Matter 2002 (QM 2002), Nantes, France); arXiv:nucl-ex/0210036

  9. B Wosieket al, Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Ultrarelativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions (Quark Matter 2002 (QM 2002), Nantes, France); arXiv:nucl-ex/0210037

  10. J Benecke, T T Chou, C-N Yang and E Yen,Phys. Rev. 188, 2159 (1969)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J E Eliaset al, Phys. Rev. D22, 13 (1980)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. G J Alneret al, Z. Phys. C33, 1 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  13. I G Beardenet al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 202301 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. J D Bjorken,Phys. Rev. D27, 140 (1983)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. PA Steinberget al, Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Ultrarelativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions (Quark Matter 2002 (QM 2002), Nantes, France); arXiv:nucl-ex/0211002 B B Backet al, Phys. Rev. Lett. (submitted); arXiv:nucl-ex/0301017

  16. J Klay and U C Davis, Ph.D. Thesis (2001) S V Afanasievet al, arXiv:nucl-ex/0205002 (2002)

  17. D E Groomet al, Euro. Phys. J. C15, 1 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. A H Mueller,Nucl. Phys. B213, 85 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. M Basileet al, Phys. Lett. B92, 367 (1980)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. M Basileet al, Phys. Lett. B95, 311 (1980)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. P Abreuet al, Phys. Lett. B459, 397 (1999)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. J E Eliaset al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 285 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. A Białas, B Bleszyński and W Czyz,Nucl. Phys. B111, 461 (1976)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. D Kharzeev and M Nardi,Phys. Lett. B507, 121 (2001)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. D Kharzeev and E Levin,Phys. Lett. B523, 79 (2001) D Kharzeev, E Levin and M Nardi; arXiv:hep-ph/0111315

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. K Adcoxet al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 022301 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. C Adleret al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 202301 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. C Rolandet al, Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Ultrarelativistic Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions (Quark Matter 2002 (QM 2002), Nantes, France)

  29. K Adcoxet al, arXiv:nucl-ex/0207009 (2002);Phys. Lett. B (submitted)

  30. C Adleret al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 082302 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Additional information

This presentation is based in large part on the PHOBOS summary talk by M Baker at the16th Int. Conf. on Ultrarelativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions, Quark Matter 2002, Nantes, France

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carroll, A.S., For the PHOBOS Collaboration., Back, B.B. et al. PHOBOS at RHIC: Some global observations. Pramana - J Phys 61, 865–876 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02704455

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02704455

Keywords

PACS Nos.

Navigation