Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research and reality

  • Articles
  • Published:
Audiovisual communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. CARPENTER, C. R., and GREENHILL, L. P.,An Investigation of Closed-Circuit Television for Teaching University Courses. Instructional Television Research Project Number One. The Pennsylvania State University, July 31, 1955.

  2. FINN, JAMES D. “Professionalizing the Audio-Visual Field.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 1: 6–17; Winter 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  3. HOBAN, CHARLES F. “Determinants of Audience Reaction to a Training Film.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 1: 30–37; Winter 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  4. HOBAN, CHARLES F. “Determinants of Audience Reaction: Status.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 1: 242–50; Fall 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  5. INSTRUCTIONAL FILM RESEARCH PROGRAM STAFF.Evaluation of the Film: Military Police Support in Emergencies (Riot Control) TF 19-1701. Instructional Film Research Program. SPECDEVCEN Technical Report No. 269-7-52. Port Washington, L. I., N. Y.; Special Devices Center.

  6. MCINTYRE, CHARLES J.Training Film Evaluation: FB254—Cold Weather Uniforms. Instructional Film Research Program. SPECDEVCEN Technical Report No. 269-7-51. Port Washington, L. I., N. Y.: Special Devices Center, August 20, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  7. MEIERHENRY, WESLEY C. “Enriching the Curriculum Through Motion Pictures.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 3: 91–98; Spring 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  8. MERCER, JOHN, and BECKER, SAM “The Disenchantments of Educational TV.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 3: 173–81; Summer 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  9. VANDERMEER, A. W., and COGSWELL, JOIINInstructional Effect of the Film “How To Operate the Army 16mm Sound Projector Set,” Instructional Film Research Program. SPECDEVCEN Technical Report No. 269-7-29. Port Washington, L. I., N. Y.: Special Devices Center, September 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  10. VANDERMEER, A. W.Training Film Evaluation: Comparison Between Two Films on Personal Hygiene. Instructional Film Research Program. SPECDEVCEN Technical Report No. 269-7-50. Port Washington, L. I., N. Y.: Special Devices Center.

  11. WOOD, BEN D., and FREEMAN, FRANK N.Motion Pictures in the Classroom. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ZUCKERMAN, JOHN V. “Predicting Film Learning by Pre-Release Testing.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 2: 49–55; Winter 1954.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Charles F. Hoban
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Here is an examination of the realities of AV communication research that considers the implications of the researcher and his training, the restrictions of research support, the orientation of research, and the problems of evaluation research. Charles F. Hoban is a member of the research staff, Institute for cooperative Research, University of Pennsylvania.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoban, C.F. Research and reality. ETR&D 4, 3–20 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02718454

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02718454

Keywords

Search

Navigation