Abstract
An experiment was conducted to determine whether the level of personalization expressed in the type of addressing procedures on an outside envelope affected the response rates in two diverse settings. The study utilized a 2×3 factorial design with two types of survey settings (Training and Development Directors and Trucking CEO's) and three levels of envelope addressing (typed, lables, hand-written). Comparison of response rates revealed significant main effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blumberg, H., Fuller, C. & Hare, P. Response rates in postal surveys.Public Opinion Quarterly, 1974, Vol. 38, 113–23.
Carpenter, E. Personalizing mail surveys: A replication and reassessment.Public Opinion Quarterly, 1974–1975 (win.), Vol. 38 (4), 614–20.
Duncan, W. Mail questionnaires in survey research: A review of response inducement techniques.Journal of Management, 1979, 5(1), 39–55.
Kahle, L. & Sales, B. Personalization of the outside envelope in mail surveys.Public Opinion Quarterly, 1978 (win.), Vol. 42(4), 547–550.
Kanuk, L. & Berenson, C. Mail surveys and response rates: A literature review.Journal of Marketing Research, 1975 (Nove.), Vol. 12(4), 440–453.
Linsky, A. Stimulating response to mailed questionnaires: A review.Public Opinion Quarterly, 1975, 21, 384–388.
Peterson, R. An experimental investigation of mail survey responses.Journal of Business Research, 1975, 3, 199–210.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neider, L.L., Sugrue, P.K. Addressing procedures as a mail survey response inducement technique. JAMS 11, 455–460 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721928
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721928