Abstract
Can presentations by an iconic system (pictures) and a linguistic system (print or audio) aid learning? Tests given fourth-to-sixth graders showed that they alternate between systems, using each to assimilate information. However, when content differed between the systems — and this information was presented simultaneously (visual + audio) — processing of the information was not as effective.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baggett, P. Structurally equivalent stories in movie and text and the effect of medium on recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979,18, 333–356.
Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 717–726.
Brody, P. J., & Legenza, A. Can pictorial attributes serve mathemagenic functions?Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1980,28, 25–29.
Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. A formula for predicting readability: Instructions.Educational Research Bulletin, 1948,27, 37–54.
Dirks, J., & Neisser, U. Memory for objects in real scenes: The development of recognition and recall.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977,23, 315–328.
Dwyer, F. M.A guide for improving visualized instruction. State College, Pa.: Learning Services, 1972.
Goldberg, F. Effects of imagery on learning incidental material in the classroom.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974,66, 233–237.
Goodman, N.The language of art. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1976.
Gropper, G. L. Learning from visuals: Some behavioral considerations.AV Communication Review, 1966,14, 37–69.
Haring, M. J., & Fry, M. A. Effects of pictures on children’s comprehension of written text.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1979,27, 185–190.
Hartman, F. R. Single and multiple communication: A review of research and proposed model.AV Communication Review, 1961,9, 235–262.
Hoffman, C. D., & Dick, S. A. A developmental investigation of recognition memory.Child Development, 1976,47, 794–799.
Koenke, K., & Otto, W. Contribution of pictures to children’s comprehension of the main idea in reading.Psychology in the Schools, 1969,6, 298–302.
Levin, J. R. Inducing comprehension in poor readers: A test of a recent model,Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973,65, 19–24.
Levin, J. R., & Lesgold, A. M. On pictures and prose.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1978,26, 233–243.
Maginnis, G. D. The readability graph and informal reading inventories.The Reading Teacher, 1969,22, 516–517.
Nasser, D. L., & McEwen, W. J. The impact of alternative media channels: Recall and involvement with messages.AV Communication Review, 1976,24, 263–272.
Paivio, A.Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Co., 1971.
Paivio, A. Perceptual comparisons through the mind’s eye.Memory and Cognition, 1975,3, 635–647.
Peeck, J. Retention of pictorial and verbal content of a text with illustrations.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974,66, 880–888.
Peng, C.-Y., & Levin, J. R. Pictures and children’s story recall: Some questions of durability.Educational Communication Technology Journal, 1979,27, 39–44.
Rasco, R. W., Tennyson, R. D., & Boutwell, R. C. Imagery instructions and drawings in learning prose.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 188–192.
Rohwer, W. D., & Harris, W. J. Media effects on prose learning in two populations of children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 651–657.
Rohwer, W. D., Jr., & Matz, R. Improving aural comprehension in white and black children: Pictures vs. print.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1975,19, 23–26.
Salomon, G.Interaction of media, cognition and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1979.
Severin, W. The effectiveness of relevant pictures in multiple-channel communications.AV Communication Review, 1967,15, 386–401.
Snowman, J., & Cunningham, D. J. A comparison of pictorial and written adjunct aids in learning from text.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 307–311.
Stevens, H. W., & Siegel, A. Effects of instructions and age on retention of filmed content.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1969,60, 71–74.
Tennyson, R. D. Pictorial support and specific instructions as design variables for children’s concept and rule learning.Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 1978,26, 291–299.
Travers, R. M. W.Research and theory related to audiovisual information transmission (Rev. ed.). Kalamazoo, Mich.: Western Michigan University, 1967.
Van Mondfrans, A. P., & Travers, R. M. W. Learning of redundant material presented through two sensory modalities.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1964,19, 743–751.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nugent, G.C. Pictures, audio, and print: symbolic representation and effect on learning. ECTJ 30, 163–174 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766597
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766597