Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of attitude changes elicited by live and videotape classroom presentations

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Becker, S. L. Interest, tension, and retention.AV Communication Review, 1964,12, 277–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgus, R. H.Perception. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, J. O., & Massialas, B. G. Instructional television and the classroom teacher.AV Communication Review, 1964,12, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelly, H. H.Communication and persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness.Public Opinion Quarterly, 1952,15, 635–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janes, R. W. Pre-existing attitudes of college students to instructional television.AV Communication Review, 1964,12, 325–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, D. B. The evaluation of televised instruction.AV Communication Review, 1966,14, 363–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, B. What does research say about instructional television?Illinois Education, 1963,51, 337–338.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Croft, R.G., Stimpson, D.V., Ross, W.L. et al. Comparison of attitude changes elicited by live and videotape classroom presentations. ECTJ 17, 315–321 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02767642

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02767642

Keywords

Navigation