Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nonlinearity in filmic presentation: Part II, discussion

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allen, Leigh. “Eleven Cameras for Circarama.”American Cinematographer 36: 476; August 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, William H. ldAudio-Visual Communication.”Encyclopedia of Educational Research. (Edited by Chester W. Harris.) Third edition. New York: Macmillan, 1960. pp. 115–137.

    Google Scholar 

  3. “Approach to Multi-Imagery.”Business Screen Magazine 23: 36–39; 1962.

  4. Arkadyev, B.“Multi-Screen.”Soviet Screen, October 1960. p. 18.

  5. Arnheim, Rudolf.Art and Visual Perception. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Attneave, Fred.Applications of Information Theory to Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Augenstine, L. G.Human Performance in Information Transmission: Part VI, Evidences of Periodicity in Information Processing. Report No. R-75. Urbana: Control System Laboratory, University of Illinois, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Belanger, Pierre R.Time-Varying Characteristics of the Human Operator in an Open Loop. Report No. 8055-4. Boston: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, March 30, 1962.

  9. Berlyne, D. E. “The Influence of Complexity and Novelty in Visual Stimuli on Orienting Responses.”Journal of Experimental Psychology 55: 289–296; 1958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berlyne, D. E. “Attention, Perception, and Behavior Theory.”Psychological Review 58: 137–146; 1951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Biser, Erwin.Human Engineering. Fort Monmouth, N.J.: Signal Corps Engineering Laboratories, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bloom, Benjamin S., editor.Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longmans, Green and Co., 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  13. “Borden Unveils Panaramic Life Film Show.”Business Screen Magazine 10: 30; June 1949.

  14. Bruner, Jerome S.The Process of Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bushneil, Don D., and Cogswell, John F. “A Computer-Based Laboratory for Automation in School Systems.”AV Communication Review 9: 173–185; July–August 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Buswell, Guy T.How People Look at Pictures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carpenter, C. R. “A Theoretical Orientation for Instructional Film Research.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 1: 38–52; Winter 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chaplin, J. P., and Krawiec, T. S.Systems and Theories of Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Christianson, Donald, editor.“The Changing Perspective in Microcircuits.”Electronic Design 11: 45–83; February 15, 1963.

  20. Cohen, Morris R.A Preface to Logic. New York: Meridian Books, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  21. “Color-Size Selling.”Business Screen Magazine 9: 28; 1948.

  22. Cooney, Stuart. “The Role of the Pictorial in Message Design.”AV Communication Review 9: 63–65; January–February 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Coulson, John E., and Silberman, Harry F. “Automated Teaching and Individual Differences.”AV Communication Review 9: 5–15; January–February 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Danko, S. F. “Printed Circuits and Microelectronics.”Proceedings of the IRE, May 1962. Vol. 50, pp. 937–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ely, Jerome H.; Bowen, Hugh M.; and Orlansky, Jesse. “Man Machine Dynamics.”Joint Services Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio: Wright Air Development Center, 1957. Chapter 7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Enoch, Jay M. “Effect of the Size of a Complex Display upon Visual Search.”Journal of Optical Society of America 49: 280–286; 1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fearing, Franklin. “Human Communication.”AV Communication Review 10: 78–108; September–October 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fearing, Franklin. “Toward a Psychological Theory of Human Communication.”Journal of Personality 22: 71–88; 1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Finn, James. “Technology and the Instructional Process.”AV Communication Review 8: 5–26; Winter 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  30. “Ford Tours the Shopping Centers.”Business Screen Magazine 20: 34; 1959.

  31. Glanzer, M. “Curiosity, Exploratory Drive, and Stimulus Satiation.”Psychological Bulletin 55: 302–315; 1958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gombrich, E. H.“How To Read a Painting.”Saturday Evening Post, July 29,1961. pp. 20–21.

  33. Hanson, Norwood Russell.Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hartman, Frank R. “Single and Multiple Channel Communication: A Review of Research and a Proposed Model.”AV Communication Review 9: 235–262; November–December 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hartshone, Charles, and Weiss, Paul.Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Pierce: Volume I, Principles of Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hebb, D. O.Organization of Behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hill, Derek. “Dynamic Frame.”American Cinematographer 38: 236–237; April 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hoagland, A. S. “Mass Storage.”Proceedings of the IRE, May 1962. Vol. 50, pp. 1087–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hoban, Charles F., Jr., and van Ormer, Edward B.Instructional Film Research, 1918–1950. Report #269-7-19. New York: Port Washington, Long Island, Special Devices Center, n.d.

  40. Hughes, James.“A Story of Six Screens.”Industrial Photography, July 1960. pp. 44–47.

  41. Iakimanskaia, I. S. “Urovni analiza sinteza i abstraktsii pri chtenii u uchashchikhaia IV-VIII klassov.” (”Levels of Analysis, Synthesis, and Abstraction in Fourth to Eighth Grade Pupils with Respect to Reading Drawings.”)Voprosky Psikhologii 5:114–126; 1959. As reported by London, I. D.Psychological Abstracts 34: 92; February 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Isaacs, Kenneth. “Think Box.”Industrial Design 9: 48–51; November–December 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Israeli, Nathan. “Ambiguous Sound Patterns: Time of Perception of Variable Non-Visual Figure-Ground and Part-Whole Relationships.”Journal of Psychology 29: 449–452; 1950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jacobs, Lewis. “D. W. Griffith.”Film: An Anthology. (Edited by Daniel Talbot.) New York: Simon and Schuster, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  45. James, William.The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1890. Vol. I.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Johnson, Donald M.Psychology: A Problem-Solving Approach. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Johnson, Donald M.The Psychology of Thought and Judgment. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kohler, Wolfgang, and Adams, Pauline Austine. “Perception and Attention.”American Journal of Psychology 71: 489–503 ; 1958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Körner, Stephan.Conceptual Thinking. New York: Dover Publications, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Korzybski, Alfred.Science and Sanity. Lakeville, Conn.: International Non-Aristotelian Library, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kracauer, Siegfried.From Caligari to Hitler. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Langer, Susanne K.Philosophy in a New Key. New York: New American Library, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lewis, C. I.Mind and the World Order. New York: Dover Publications, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Long, L., and Welch, L. “Influence of Abstractness on Reasoning Ability.”Journal of Psychology 13: 41–59; 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Malandin, Claude.Grouped and Successive Images. Saint Cloud, France: Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches pour la Diffusion du FranÇais (CREDIF), Ecole Normale Superieur de Saint Cloud, n.d.

  56. Malandin, Claude.Research on the Understanding of Film Strips. Saint Cloud, France: Ministère de l’Education Nationale, Ecole Normale Superieur de Saint Cloud, n.d. (Mimeo.)

  57. Malandin, Claude.Screen Perception and Audio Visual Techniques. Seminar in the Psychology of Audio Visual Means in Elementary Teaching. Caen, France: UNESCO, Commission de la République FranÇaise pour l’Education, la Science, et la Culture, May 3–12, 1962. (Mimeo.)

  58. McLuhan, Marshall.Understanding Media. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Merrifield, P. R., and others.“The Role of Intellectual Factors in Problem Solving.”Psychological Monographs, 1962. Vol. 76, pp. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Miller, Neal, and others.“Graphic Communication and the Crisis in Education.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 5: 1–113; No. 3, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Monaghan, Frank, editor.Official Guidebook: New York World’s Fair. New York: Exposition Publication, 1939. p. 182.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Morris, Charles W.Signs, Language, and Behavior. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Mosby, Aline. “Movie Systems of the Future.”American Cinematographer 39: 492–493; August 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Nelson, George.“Art X: The Georgia Experiment.”Industrial Design, October 1954. p. 44.

  65. Newman, J. Robert.Some Considerations of Human Data Utilization in Diagnostic Decision Making. SP-978. Santa Monica, Calif.: System Development Corporation, November 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Overturf, Kendall.“An Automated Briefing.”Data Processing, August 1962.

  67. Pelton, Warren, and Vaughn, Leroy.Programming-An Approach to Problem Solving. SP-167. Santa Monica, Calif.: System Development Corporation, April 7, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Polya, G.How To Solve It. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Postman, Leo, and Bruner, Jerome. “Multiplicity of Set as a Determinant of Perceptual Behavior.”Journal of Experimental Psychology 39: 369–377; 1949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Postman, Leo, and Phillips, Laura. “Studies in Incidental Learning: I. The Effects of Crowding and Isolation.”Journal of Experimental Psychology 48: 48–56; 1954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Prouse, Derek. “Dynamic Frame.”Sight and Sound 25:159–160; 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Reed, H. B. “The Learning and Retention of Concepts: IV, Influence of Complexity of Stimuli.”Journal of Experimental Psychology 36: 252–261; 1946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Reed, H. B. “The Learning and Retention of Concepts: V, The Influence of Form of Presentation.”Journal of Experimental Psychology 40: 504–511; 1950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Robinson, David. “Magic Lantern.”Sight and Sound 30: 91; 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Roshka, A. Usloviia. “Sposobstvuiuschchis Abstragirovaniiu i Obobschcheniiu.” (”Conditions Facilitating Abstraction and Generalization.”)Voprosky Psikhologii 4: 89–96; 1958. As reported by London, I. D.Psychological Abstracts 34: 85; 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Rotha, Paul.The Film Till Now. London: Vision Press, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Sales Management. Part II, September 21,1962.

  78. Simmons, R. F. “Synthex: Toward Computer Synthesis of Human Language Behavior.”Computer Applications in the Behavior Sciences. (Edited by H. Borko.) New York: Prentice-Hall, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Smith, Olin W. “The Significance of Form Discrimination for Psychology in General.”Form Discrimination as Related to Military Problems. Proceedings of a Symposium edited by W. Wulfeck and John F. Taylor. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Spaulding, Seth. “Communication Potential of Pictorial Illustration.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 4: 31–46; Winter 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Spaulding, Seth. “Research on Pictorial Illustration.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 3: 35–45; Winter 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Stroud, J. B. “Effect of Complexity of Material upon the Form of Learning Curves.”American Journal of Psychology 44: 721–732; 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Svoboda, Georgi. What’s This Multi-Screen.”Soviet Screen, December 1960. pp. 16–17.

  84. Twyford, Loran C. “Profile Techniques for Program Analysis.”Audio-Visual Communication Review 2: 243–262; Fall 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  85. U.S. Army.Training by Television and Television Prompting Equipment. New York: Redstone Arsenal, Ordnance Guided Missile School, February 18, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Voyce, Arthur.“Russia’s Circular Kinopanorama.”American dnematographer, January 1960. p. 46.

  87. Waatmough, Joshua.Language. New York: New American Library, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Welch, Paul.“The Knowledge Box.”Life magazine, September 14, 1962. pp. 109–112.

  89. Wertheimer, Max.Productive Thinking. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Wertheimer, Max. “The Laws of Organization of Perceptual Form.”A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. (Edited by Willis D. Ellis.) New York: Humanities Press, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Woodson, W. E.Human Engineering Guide for Equipment Designers. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Zuckerman, John V.“Commentary Variations: Level of Verbalization, Personal Reference, and Phase Relations in Instructional Films on Perceptual Motor Tasks.” TR-SDC 269-7-4. University Park: Special Devices Center, Pennsylvania State College, 1949.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Command Research Program, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California

    Stuart M. Cooney (specialist in research communication)

  2. Department of Cinema, University of Southern California, USA

    William H. Allen (director of research)

Authors
  1. Stuart M. Cooney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William H. Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The research reported herein was supported by a grant from the Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, under provisions of Title VII of the National Defense Education Act of 1958. This paper summarizes the final report of Title VII, Project Number 422, by William H. Allen and Stuart M. Cooney, “A Study of the Non-Linearity Variable in Filmic Presentation.” Part I of the summary appeared in the Summer 1964 issue ofAVCR.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooney, S.M., Allen, W.H. Nonlinearity in filmic presentation: Part II, discussion. AVCR 12, 302–324 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769064

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769064

Keywords

Search

Navigation