Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Designing electronic text: The role of print-based research

  • Articles
  • ERIC/ECTJ Annual Review Paper
  • Published:
ECTJ Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is the 14th ERIC/ECTJ Annual Review Paper, preparation of which was supported by the ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center) Clearinghouse on Information Resources, Syracuse University. The material in this article was prepared pursuant to a contract with the National Institute of Education, U.S. Department of Education. Contractors undertaking such projects under govemment sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their judgement in professional and technical matters. Points of view or opinions do not necessarily represent the official view or opinion of the NIE.—Ed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesandrini, K. L. (1987). Computer graphics in learning and instruction. In H. A. Houghton and D. M. Willows (Eds.),The psychology of illustration: Vol. 2: Instructional issues. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askwall, S. (1985). Computer supported reading versus reading text on paper: A comparison of two reading situations.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22, 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avons, S. E., Beveridge, M. C., Hickman, A. T., & Hitch, G. J. (1983). Teaching journey graphs with micro-computer animation.Human Learning, 2, 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backmann, J., Lundberg, I., Nilsson, L., & Ohlsson, K. (1984). Reading skill and text structure.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 32(1) p. 51 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, C. R. (1984). Visual cueing strategies: Pictorial, textual and combinational effects.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 32(4), 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beggs, W. D. A., & Howarth, P. N. (1985). Inner speech as a learned skill.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 396–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bork, A. (1983). A preliminary taxonomy of ways of displaying text on screens.Information Design Journal, 3(3), 206–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, M., & Foster, J. J. (1982). The visibility of colored characters on colored backgrounds in Viewdata displays.Visible Language, XVI, 382–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. J., Marchetti, F. M., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1981). Reading speed and text production: A note on right-justification techniques.Ergonomics, 24, 611–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christ, R. E. (1975). Review and analysis of color coding research for visual displays.Human Factors, 17, 542–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christ, R. E. (1984). Research for evaluating visual display codes: An emphasis on color coding. In R. Easterby & H. Zwaga (Eds.),Information Design. Chichester, U. K.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., & Stordahl, K. E. (1955). The effect of organisational aids on comprehension and retention.Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocklin, T. G., Ward, N. J., Chen, H., & Suola, J. F. (1984). Factors influencing readability of rapidly presented text segments.Memory and Cognition, 12(5), 431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, W. H. (1986). Reading from microfiche, a VDT and the printed page: Subjective fatigue and performance.Human Factors, 28(1), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Corte, W. (1986). Optimal colors, phosphours, and illuminant characteristics for CRT displays: The algorithmic approach.Human Factors, 28(1) 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, J. (1985). A turning point in type design.Visible Language, XIX(1), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchnicky, R. L., & Kolers, P. A. (1983). Readability of text scrolled on visual display terminals as a function of window size.Human Factors, 25(6), 683–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, R. M. (1978).Strategies for improving visual learning. State College, PA: Learning Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1977). Rudiments of numeracy.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 140, 227–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkerton, J., & Williges, R. C. (1984). Infomation retrieval strategies in a file search environment.Human Factors, 26(2), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follettie, J. F. (1978). Research on table-using tasks. Series 2 Studies. (Report TN 2-78-04). Los Alamitos, CA: Southwest Regional Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. J. (1979). The use of visual cues in text. In P. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.),Processing of visible language. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. J., & Bruce, M. (1982). Looking for entries in videotex tables: A comparison of four color formats.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(5), 611–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frase, L. T., Macdonald, N. H., & Keenan, S. A. (1985). Intuitions, algorithms and a science of text design. In T. Duffy & R. W. Waller (Eds.),Designing usable texts. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frase, L. T., & Schwartz, B. J. (1979). Typographic cues that facilitate comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galitz, W. O. (1981).Handbook of screen format design. Wellesley, MA: QED Information Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J. D., & Grischkowsky, N. (1984). Doing the same work with hard copy and with cathode-ray tube (CRT) computer terminals.Human Factors, 26(3), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabinger, R. S. (1984, Spring). CRT text design: Psychological attributes underlying the evaluation of models of CRT text displays.Journal of Visual Verbal Languaging, pp. 17–39.

  • Grabinger, R. S. (1985).Relationships among text format variables in computer-generated text. Paper presented to the Annual Conference, AECT, Las Vegas, NV, 1985. (Copies available from the author at 118, Henzlik Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588)

  • Granaas, M. M., McKay, T. D., Laham, D., & Hurt, L. (1984). Reading moving text on a CRT screen.Human Factors, 26 (1), 97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, M., & Poulton, E. C. (1970). Even versus uneven right-hand margins and rate of comprehension in reading.Ergonomics, 13, 427–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, C., & Hayes, J. R. (1985a).Effects of text display variables on reading tasks: Computer screen versus hard copy (CDC Technical Report No. 3). Pittsburgh: Communications Design Center, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, C., & Hayes, J. R. (1985b).Reading on the computer: A comparison of standard and advanced computer display and hard copy (CDC Technical Report No. 7). Pittsburgh: Communications Design Center, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, R. D. (1986).Fourier series and transitions: A computer illustrated text. London: Hilger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (1980). Spatial cues in text: Some comments on the paper by Frase and Schwartz (1979).Visible Language, XIV(1), 62–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (1982). Student preferences in typography.Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 19(2), 166–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (1985).Designing instructional text (2nd ed.). New York: Nichols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (1986). Planning the typographical structure of instructional text.Educational Psychologist, 21(4), 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., & Burnhill, P. (1971). Experiments with unjustified text.Visible Language, V(3), 265–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., & Rooum, D. (1983). Sir Cyril Burt and typography.British Journal of Psychology, 74(2), 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., Young, M., & Burnhill, P. (1975). On the typing of tables.Applied Ergonomics, 6, 39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heines, J. (1984).Screen design strategies for computer assisted instruction. Bedford, MA: Digital Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henney, M. (1981). The effect of all-capital print versus regular mixed print as displayed on a micro-computer screen on reading speed and accuracy.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 31(2), p. 126 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershberger, W. A., & Terry, D. F. (1965). Typographical cueing in conventional and programmed texts.Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(1), 55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchingson, R. D., Williams, R. D., Reid, T. G., & Dudek, C. L. (1981). Formatting, message load, sequencing method and presentation rate for computer generated displays.Human factors, 23(5), 551–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jandreau, S. M., Muncer, S. J., & Bever, T. G. (1986). Improving the readability of text with automatic phrase-sensitive formatting.British Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 128–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaspert, W. P., Berry, W. T., & Johnson, A. F. (1970).The encyclopaedia of typefaces. London: Blandford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, S. A. (1984). Effects of chunking and line-length on reading efficiency.Visible Language, XVIII(1), 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S. T. (1986). Learning to use electronic text: An agenda for research on typography, graphics and interpanel navigation.Information Design Journal, 4(3), 206–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinney, G. C., & Showman, D. J. (1967). The relative legibility of upper-case and lower-case typewritten words.Information Display, 4, 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolers, P. A., Duchnicky, R. L., & Ferguson, D. C. (1981). Eyemovement measurement of readability of CRT displays.Human Factors, 23, 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruk, R. S., & Muter, P. (1984). Reading continuous text on video screens.Human Factors, 26, 339–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., Whalen, T., McEwen, S., & Latremouille, S. (1984). Optimising the design of menu pages for information retrieval.Ergonomics, 27(10), 1051–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorch, R. F., & Chen, A. H. (1986). Effects of number signals on reading and recall.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, N. J. (1983). The unix writer's workbench software: Rationale and design.The Bell System Technical Journal, 62(6), 1891–1908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald-Ross, M. (1977a). How numbers are shown: A review of research on the presentation of quantitative data in texts.Audiovisual Communication Review, 25, 359–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald-Ross, M. (1977b). Graphics in text. In L. S. Shulman (Ed.),Review of research in education (Vol. 5). Itasca, IL: Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, M. E., Burnette, J. T., & Gutmann, J. C. (1977). Font comparisons for 5×7 dot matrix characters.Human Factors, 19(1), 89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. M., & Kendall, J. R. (1979). Facilitating reading comprehension through text structure manipulation.Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 25, 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, P. F. (1982). Displaying text on microcomputers. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.),The technology of text. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. J. F. (1985). Signaling the structure of text. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.),The technology of text (Vol. 2). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muncer, S. J., Gorman, B. S., Gorman, S., & Bibel, D. (1986). Right is wrong: An examination of the effect of right justification on reading.British Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norrish, P. (1984). Moving tables from paper to screen.Visible Language, XVIII(2), 154–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrish, P. (1986).The graphic translatability of text. (R & D Report No. 5854). London: The British Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, S. R., Sisson, N., & Snowberry, K. (1985). Organisation of broad computer menu displays.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 23(6), 689–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poggenpohl, S. (Ed.), (1985). Graphic design: Computer graphics [Special issue].Visible Language,XIX(2), 173–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulton, E. C. (1960). A note on printing to make comprehension easier.Ergonomics, 3, 245–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulton, E. C. (1985). Geometric illusions in reading graphs.Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 543–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulton, E. C., & Brown, C. H. (1968). Rate of comprehension of an existing teleprinter output and of possible alternatives.Applied Psychology, 52, 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullinger, D. J. (1984). The design and presentation of the computer human factors journal in the Blend system.Visible Language, XVIII(2), 171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. K. (1986). Effect of computer graphics on improving estimates to algebra word problems.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinking, D., & Schreiner, R. (1985). The effects of computer mediated text on measures of comprehension and reading behavior.Reading Research Quarterly, XX(5), 536–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, L. (1980). Teletext and viewdata—a new challenge for the designer. In J. Hartley (Ed.),The psychology of written communication: Selected readings. New York: Nichols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, L. (1982). Display problems for teletext. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.),The technology of text. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R. S., & Tite, H. C. (1985). The use of computer graphics to facilitate story-telling in young children.Educational Studies, 11(3), 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, T. M., & Barbato, G. J. (1978). Dot-matrix alphanumerics viewed under discrete element degradation.Human Factors, 20(4), 473–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roske-Hofstrand, J. R., & Paap, K. R. (1986). Cognitive networks as a guide to menu organisation: An application in the automated cockpit.Ergonomics, 29(11), 1301–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, M. M. (1985). Spatial context as an aid to page layout: A system for planning and sketching.Visible Language, XIX(2), 243–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackel, B. (1983). The BLEND system-programme for the study of some electronic journals.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(1), 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shebilske, W. L, & Rotondo, J. A. (1981). Typographical and spatial cues that facilitate learning from textbooks.Visible Language, XV(1), 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sless, D. (1984). Visual literacy: A failed opportunity.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 32(4), 224–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H. L., & Taylor, G. B. (1979). The sensitivity of response measures of alphanumeric legibility to variation in dot matrix display parameters.Human Factors, 21(4), 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southall, R. (1981). Character generator systems for broadcast television.Information Design Journal, 2(1), 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiker, A., Rogers, S. P., Cincinelli, J. (1986). Selecting colour codes for a computer generated topographic map based on perception experiments and functional requirements.Ergonomics, 29(11), 1313–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J. (1981). The effect of the format and the number of arguments on comprehension of text by college undergraduates. In L. J. Chapman (Ed.),The reader and the text. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, V. L. (1983). Effects of color in filmed behavior sequences on descriptions and elaboration by Liberian schoolboys.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 21(1), 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedford, W. H., Berquist, S. L., & Flynn, W. E. (1977). The size-colorillusion.Journal of General Psychology, 97(1), 145–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinker, M. A. (1965).Bases for effective reading. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. (1983).The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press, Box 430, Cheshire, CT 06410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. (1977).Exploratory data analysis. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullis, T. S. (1983). The formatting of alphanumeric displays: A review and analysis.Human Factors, 25(6), 657–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twyman, M. (1981). Typography without words.Visible Language, XV(1), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, R. H. W., Lefrere, P., & Macdonald-Ross, M. (1982). Do you need that second color?IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. PC-25(2), 80–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, L., & Nisbet, J. (1974).Legibility in children's books. London: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, L. S., Mills, C. B., Koved, L., & Shneiderman, B. (1985). The structure of information in online and paper technical manuals. In R. W. Swezey (Ed.),Proceedings of the Human Factors, 29th Annual Meeting (Vol. 2). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalley, P., & Fleming, R. (1975). An experiment with a simple recorder of reading behavior.Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 12, 120–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, A. J. (1984).Visual illusions, eye-strain, headaches and epilepsy. Paper to the Annual meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, September 1984. (Copies available from the author, MRC Applied Psychology Unit, 15, Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 2EF, U.K.).

  • Winn, W. (1987). Using charts, graphs and diagrams in educational materials. In D. M. Willows and H. A. Houghton (Eds.),The psychology of illustration: Vol. 1. Basic research. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, W. D., & Holliday, W. G. (1982). Design principles for diagrams and charts. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.),The technology of text. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. (1980). The comprehension of tabulated information: Some similarities between reading prose and reading tables.NSPI Journal, XIX(8), 25–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. (1982). A user-oriented approach to the design of tables and flowcharts. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.),The technology of text. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology at the University of Keele, Staffordshire, U.K.

    James Hartley (Reader and Head)

Authors
  1. James Hartley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartley, J. Designing electronic text: The role of print-based research. ECTJ 35, 3–17 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769448

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02769448

Keywords

Search

Navigation