Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The developmental state: Israel, South Korea, and Taiwan compared

  • Development Research
  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growth performances of the Israeli economy during the years 1948–1973 were excellent by any criteria, and are comparable to the “miraculous” performances of South Korea and Taiwan. Excellent economic performances in the three countries were accompanied by the presence of an autonomous and an interventionist state as well as by strategies of governed development (in the spheres of finance, investment, and international trade). The comparison is used, to shed new light on the Israeli political economy as well as on the replicability of the developmental state model across regions, cultures, and political regimes. First, by comparing the three countries and pointing to the similarities in the role and autonomy of the state, the article offers a different interpretation of the Israeli economy from that offered by both neoclassical and neomarxist interpretations of the Israeli political economy. Second, successful cases of develoment are rare in our world; this should make the study of the Israeli political economy a valuable case-study for the proponents of the developmental state model. By pointing out the similarities in the growth performances and the developmental strategies of Israel, Taiwan, and South Korea, as well as the dissimilarities in their political regimes, their cultural traditions, and their regional settings, this article further strengthens the arguments in favor of state-guided economic development in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AHARONI, Y. 1991The Israeli economy London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMIEL, V.D. 1972 Effective rates of exchange in Israel’s foreign trade, 1962–1970.Bank of Israel Economic Review 39: 28–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMSDEN, A. 1985 The state and Taiwan’s economic development. In Evans P. et al., eds.,Bringing the state back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 78–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1989Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARRIGHI G. and JESSICA, D. 1986 The stratification of the world economy: An exploration of the semiperipheral zone.Review, X, 9–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • BALASSA, B. 1982Development strategies in semi-industrial economies. Baltimore: Published for the World Bank by Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARKEY J. H. 1994 When politics matter: Economic stabilization in Argentina and Israel.Studies in Comparative International Development 29: 41–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BARNETT, M. 1996 Israel in the world economy: Israel as an East Asian state? In Barnett M., ed.,Israel in comparative perspective. New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 107–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • BEN-PORATH, Y. 1986The Israeli economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • BERGER P. et al., eds. 1988In search of an East Asian development model. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAPORASO, A. J. and LEVINE, P. D. 1992Theories of political economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHAN, S. 1988 Defense burden and economic growth: Unraveling the Taiwanese enigma.American Political Science Review 82: 913–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1989 Income inequality among LDCs: A comparative analysis of alternative perspectives.International Studies Quarterly 33: 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CHENG, T-J. 1993 Guarding the commanding heights: The state as banker in Taiwan. In Haggard et al., eds.,The politics of finance.

  • CHENERY, H. 1986 Growth and transformation. In Chenery et al., eds.,Industrialization and growth: A comparative study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHOI, B-S. 1993 Financial policy and big business in Korea: The perils of financial regulation. In Haggard et al., eds.,The politics of finance.

  • CLIFFORD, L. M. 1994Troubled tiger: Businessmen, bureaucrats, and generals in, South Korea. New York: M.E. Sharp.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLINE, R. W. 1982 Can the East Asian model of development be generalized?World Development 10: 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COLE C. D. and LAYMAN, N. P. 1971Korean development: the interplay of politics and economics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 179–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • CUKIERMAN, A. 1992Central bank strategy, credibility, and independence: Theory and evidence. Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CUMINGS, B. 1984 The origins and development of the northeast Asian political economy: Industrial sectors, product cycles, and political consequences.International Organization 28.

  • CURHAN, P. J. and DAVIDSON, H. W. and SURI, R. 1977Tracing the multinationals. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAVIS, W. 1987 Religion and development: Weber and the East Asian experience., in M. Weiner and S. P. Huntington, eds.,Understanding political development. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, pp. 221–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • EVANS P. 1995Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton Princeton, University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEREFFI, G. 1990 Big business and the state. In Gereffi, G. and Wyman, L. D. eds.,Manufacturing miracles. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 90–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • GILPIN, R. 1977 Economic interdependence and national security in historical perspective. In Knorr, K. and Trager, F.,Economic issues and national security. Kansas: The Regents Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOLD, B. T. 1981Dependent development in Taiwan. Ph.D. diss. Harvard University: The Department of Sociology.

  • — 1986State and society in the Taiwan miracle. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREGOR A. J. 1981Ideology and development: Sun yat-sen and the economic history of Taiwan. Berkeley: China Research Monograph, 23. Institute of East Asian Studies. University of California.

  • HAGGARD, S. 1990Pathways from the periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAGGARD, S. et al., eds. 1993The politics of finance in developing countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HALEVI, NADAV and RUTH KLINOV-MALUL 1968The economic development of Israel New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • JACOBY, NEIL 1967U.S. aid to Taiwan: A study of foreign aid, self-help, and development. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • JENKINS, R. 1991 The political economy of industrialization: A comparison of Latin American and East Asian newly industrializing countries.Development and Change 22: 197–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JENKINS, R. 1991a Learning from the gang: Are there lessons for Latin America from East Asia?Bulletin of Latin American Research 10.

  • JOHNSON, C. 1982MITI and the Japanese miracle. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KIM, Y. B. 1980 The growth and structural change of textile industry. In Chong Kee Park,Essays on the Korean economy. Vol. III. Seoul: Korea Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLEIN, D. W. 1992 The political economy of Taiwan’s international commercial links. In L. F. D. Simon and Y.M.M. Kau, eds.,Taiwan: Beyond the economic miracle. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • KRUEGER, A. O. 1979The development role of the foreign sector and aid: Studies in the modernization of the Republic of Korea: 1945–1975. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KWACK, S. Y. 1986 The economic development of the Republic of Korea, 1965–1981. In Lau, ed.,Models of development.

  • LAU, J.L., ed. 1986Models of development. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEVI-FAUR, DAVID 1996 State and nationalism in the Israeli political economy.Israel Affairs 3, 1: 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1997 Friedrich List and the political economy of the nation-state.Review of International Political Economy 4, 1: 154–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LUEDDE-NEURATH, R. 1986Import controls and export-oriented development: A reassessment of the South Korean case. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAJONE, GIANDOMENICO 1994 Cross-national sources of regulatory policy making in Europe and the United States.Journal of Public Policy 11, 3: 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • MASON et al., 1980The economic and social modernization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAYSHAR, Y. 1986 Investment patterns. In Ben-Porath, ed.,The Israeli economy.

  • McCRAW, K.T. 1986 Mercantilism and the market: Antecedents of American industrial policy. In Barfield, C. and Schambra, W., eds.,The politics of industrial policy. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, pp. 33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGUIRE, W. J. 1994. Development policy and its determinants in East Asia and Latin America.Journal of Public Policy 14: 205–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKINNON, I. R. 1973Money and capital in economic development. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • MICHAELY, M. 1975Foreign trade regimes and economic development: Israel. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIGDAL, J. 1988Strong societies and weak states. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOBUYUKI, K. 1984International competitiveness and the price factors of the Korean textile industry: A comparative analysis. Tokyo: International Development Center of Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • NORDLINGER, A. E. 1981On the autonomy of the democratic state. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1987 Taking the state seriously. In M. Weiner and S. P. Huntington, eds.,Understanding political development. Boston: Little, Brown, pp. 353–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • ONIS, Z. 1991 The logic of the development state.Comparative Politics 24, p. 120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PANG, C-K. 1992The state and economic transformation: The Taiwan case. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • PLESSNER, Y. 1994.The political economy of Israel. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEMPEL, T. J. 1992 Of dragons of development.Journal of Public Policy 12.

  • POMFRET, R. 1976Trade policies and industrialization in a small country: The case of Israel. Tubingen: University of Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAM, U., ed. 1993Israeli society: Critical perspectives. Tel Aviv: Breirot Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • RANIS, G. 1985 Can the East Asian model of development be generalized?World Development 13: 543–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RUBNER, A. 1960.The economy of Israel: A critical account of the first ten years. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAKONG, I. 1993Korea in the world economy. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, pp. 102–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCITOVSKI, T. 1986 Economic development in Taiwan and South Korea, 1965–1986, In Lau,Models of development.

  • SKOCPOL, THEDA 1985 Bringing the state back in: Strategies of analysis in current research. InBringing the state back in, edited by P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer and T. Skocpol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • SUMMERS R. and HESTON, A. 1991 The Penn World Table (Mark 5).The Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 327–368.

  • SUSSMAN, Z. 1982 Israel. In Balassa,Development strategies in semi-industrial economies, pp. 160–211.

  • SEWELL, W. J. 1988Agenda 1988: Growth, jobs, and exports in a changing world economy. Washington, D.C.: Overseas Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • SYRQUIN, M. 1985 Economic growth and structural change. In Ben-Porath,The Israeli economy, pp. 42–74.

  • TOREN, B. 1979The inducement subsidy for location of textile mills in development towns in Israel. Ph.D. diss. The Hebrew University [Hebrew].

  • WADE, R. 1989 What can economics learn from East Asian success?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 505: 77–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1990.Governing the market. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WOO, J. 1991Race to the swift: State and finance in Korean industrialization. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZENTLER, R. 1992The activity of foreign banks in Israel. Tel Aviv: 3I, Research Series [Hebrew].

  • ZYSMAN, J. 1983Governments, markets, and growth: Financial systems and the politics of industrial change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, The University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 31905, Haifa, Israel

    David Levi-Faur

Authors
  1. David Levi-Faur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Levi-Faur.

Additional information

David Levi-Faur is a lecturer of comparative public policy and business and politics at the University of Haifa. He was a visiting scholar at the L.S.E., University of California, Berkeley, the University of Utrecht, and the University of Amsterdam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levi-Faur, D. The developmental state: Israel, South Korea, and Taiwan compared. St Comp Int Dev 33, 65–93 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02788195

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02788195

Keywords

Search

Navigation